similar to: [Fwd: Re: X-windows security in Gnome]

The "integration" of SSH with apps is already there. Read the OpenSSH [or other SSH implementation's] man pages and the SSHv2 specs. RTFM! Essentially SSH supports tunneling of X11 traffic. The SSH daemon is responsible for creating a local X11 display endpoint and setting the DISPLAY environment variable appropriately, then the apps you run in SSH sessions with X11 forwarding do

This is from a security discussion on one of the GNOME lists. Jim is one of the original X11 people, for what that's worth. I just thought I'd try to tempt some folks here into looking at doing ssh and X integration "right". Greg -- Portland, Oregon, USA. Please don't copy me on replies to the list. -------------- next part -------------- An embedded message was

The 2.1.1p3 release of portable OpenSSH has been uploaded to the OpenBSD ftp master site. In a few hours it will be available from one of the many mirrors listed at: http://www.openssh.com/portable.html This release fixes several bugs reported since the previous release and extends portability to NeXT and Reliant Unix. As usual, the OpenBSD team has been hard at work further polishing and

The 2.1.1p3 release of portable OpenSSH has been uploaded to the OpenBSD ftp master site. In a few hours it will be available from one of the many mirrors listed at: http://www.openssh.com/portable.html This release fixes several bugs reported since the previous release and extends portability to NeXT and Reliant Unix. As usual, the OpenBSD team has been hard at work further polishing and

Can interested users please test the latest snapshot at http://www.mindrot.org/misc/junk/openssh-SNAP-2000071102.tar.gz It contains quite a few fixes for small problems that have been reported in the last few weeks. Pending feedback it is going to become 2.1.1p3 Regards, Damien Miller --------------- Changelog: 20000711 - (djm) Fixup for AIX getuserattr() support from Tom Bertelson

Is this really caused by a buggy server, or is this an interoperability problem? It seems to work ok when I specify -o "protocol 1" on the command line. Thanks, Greg [gleblanc at grego1 gleblanc]$ ssh -v login.metalab.unc.edu SSH Version OpenSSH_2.2.0p1, protocol versions 1.5/2.0. Compiled with SSL (0x0090581f). debug: Reading configuration data /etc/ssh/ssh_config debug: Applying

Perhaps the man page should be fixed then, because neither rsh nor rlogin provide any kind of port forwarding, or X11 forwarding, etc... Also, the comparison between ssh and rsh is more appropriate if you're talking about SSHv1 and much less so if you're talking about SSHv2. Nico -- > -----Original Message----- > From: Eric Garff [mailto:egarff at omniture.com] > Sent:

I've got a machine running RedHat Linux 6.2 on a P-II400 with 256MB of ram. I'm mounting shares in the manner 'mount -t smbfs -o uid=user,gid=group //server/share /mount/point'. The server is a genuine NT 4 server, with SP5 and a couple of hotfixes. I mounted a couple of shares yesterday, and overnight the stopped working. When accessing the share, I get an error message that

When should sshd disconnect an SSHv2 connection? Markus Friedl says "for protocol v2 the client decides when to close the connection." In principle, I agree, because SSHv2 supports multiple sessions over the same connection, with the client able to launch new sessions anytime then it should be upto the client. But this would be a major cultural change for most users, and would break

http://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=271 Summary: SSHD should unblock SIGCHLD - POSIX signal blocks survive exec() Product: Portable OpenSSH Version: -current Platform: Other OS/Version: other Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P2 Component: sshd AssignedTo:

When processing ~& with SSHv2 OpenSSH sends \004 (EOT) and does not bother sending SSH2_MSG_CHANNEL_EOF. Why is that? Why is there no direct way to get SSH2_MSG_CHANNEL_EOF or SSH2_MSG_CHANNEL_CLOSE sent? Or is there and I'm just missing it? Thanks, Nico -- -DISCLAIMER: an automatically appended disclaimer may follow. By posting- -to a public e-mail mailing list I hereby grant

The call for participation for this year''s O''Reilly Open Source Convention has been posted. It''s included below, and you can find it online here: http://conferences.oreillynet.com/os2006/ The conference is July 24-28, and the deadline for submissions is February 13. Early submissions help! In 2005, Ruby built huge momentum at OSCON; all of the Ruby tutorials

Markus, How's this patch? - a chan_wont_read()/chan_wont_write() API is added that is very much like chan_read_failed()/chan_write_failed(), but for the debug messages and chan_wont_*() don't ever call error() The 3.0.2p1 channel_pre_x11_open() uses chan_*_failed() but looks like it ought to use chan_wont_*() instead :) - forkoff() no longer fakes EOF for SSHv2 (still

On 09/10/15 20:57, Tovey, Mark wrote: > No joy. I added winbind to the passwd, shadow, and group lines and it is still not working. I also switched back to ad instead of rid (I deleted the Samba database files in /var/lib/samba and rejoined the domain when I switched), and still the same. If the account exists locally I can authenticate against AD and map the share. No local account

For those of you that are in the Portland, Oregon area: I am giving a talk today on Asterisk at the PLUG Advanced Topics Meeting. Details below. JT >From: "Zot O'Connor" <zot@whiteknighthackers.com> >To: PLUG LIST <plug@lists.pdxlinux.org>, > PLUG Announcement List <plug-announce@pdxLinux.org> >Organization: White Knight Hacklers >Subject:

Background ========== "ssh -f ..." causes ssh to fork into the background when userauth successfully completes. WHAT === With this patch "ssh -f -f ..." causes ssh to fork into the background when the first forwarded port/x11 display/agent is successfully opened. WHY === This feature makes launching remote X11 apps more reliable: when ssh exits it must have exited because

I've experienced numerous "freeze ups" with R 1.1.0 in the past few days. I'm running on a Windows 98 (*not SE*) notebook with 128 MB RAM. Typically I have no other applications running when I load "R". The circumstances that frequently leads to the "freeze ups" is when I have done the following: >fix(somefunction) This spawns "Notepad",

I've been trying to generate a series of random normal distributions using the rnorm function. After I generated the first set: set1<-rnorm(150, 505.5, 15.2) I checked the mean and standard deviation of set1. I was surprised to find the mean at 502.37 (rounded) and the standard deviation at 13.3 (again, rounded). While I know that it is unrealistic to expect the distribution of the

Thanks to all who replied to my query about the "normality" of rnorm. I am using R 1.1.1 (the version released last week) under Windows 98. It has been unusually hot here and I noticed that the CPU fan seemed to be running at high speed for a long time. The CPU probe that I use to monitor the temperature emitted a warning shortly after I sent off the email. After shutting my

I just downloaded the binaries for the released 1.2.0 for Windows (from Guido Masarotti's site). In using the rwinst.exe installer, I noted two significant problems. First, the installer seems extraordinarily slow compared to the the 1.1.1 installer. It took almost 20 minutes to perform a full base extraction from binaries to installation (all base pages, html help, windows help, pdf