similar to: Help with OpenSSL config for Sol7 SUN4U

On Thu, 3 May 2001, Gus Mancuso wrote: > Hello OpenSSH developers > > First, many thanks for producing this app! > > I've noticed that the man pages for openssh don't look > at all like man pages. My somewhat limited > troubleshooting skills point towards a problem with > nroff not expanding the macros embedded in the man > files. > When I `man sshd`, I get

openssh 3.7p1 sshd on Solaris 8 / sparcv9: sshd runs fine, and starts to allow the login. However, when reading from /etc/default/login, I get a bus error. I am able to get sshd to work by commenting out these lines in session.c: 1015,1018c1015 < # ifdef HAVE_ETC_DEFAULT_LOGIN < read_etc_default_login(&env, &envsize, pw->pw_uid); < path =

Author: eota Repository: /hg/zfs-crypto/gate Revision: 50021b84343742e322d24ce75d5cf4b26369fd38 Log message: 6310483 boot needs some more help for gcc on SPARC Files: create: usr/src/psm/stand/boot/sparc/common/util.h update: usr/src/psm/promif/ieee1275/common/prom_node.c update: usr/src/psm/promif/ieee1275/common/prom_test.c update: usr/src/psm/stand/boot/common/readfile.c update:

Comments from the rest of the Solaris group? - Ben ---------- Forwarded message ---------- Date: Tue, 20 Feb 2001 11:20:33 +0100 From: Volker Paulsen <paulsen at orbiteam.de> To: mouring at etoh.eviladmin.org Subject: Linker flags in 2.5.1p1... While I'm compiling 2.5.1p1, I've got the following remarks: Host: sparc-sun-solaris2.7 Compiler: cc Compiler

Author: barnette Repository: /hg/zfs-crypto/gate Revision: 0268e0f35725e9a1d9f236c39be4b3110a8ee821 Log message: 6299501 sun4v cscope/tags include sun4u, still references to sun4u in sun4v directory Files: create: usr/src/uts/sun4/conf/Mapfile delete: usr/src/uts/sun4u/conf/Mapfile update: usr/src/uts/sun4u/Makefile.sun4u update: usr/src/uts/sun4u/mpxu/Makefile.mpxu update:

Dear R-HELP, We are compiling R-2.12.1 for 64 bits onto a Sun Sparc machine below: SunOS 5.10 Generic_142900-13 sun4u sparc SUNW,Netra-T12 The source was compiled successfully with "gcc version 3.4.6" by using the default configuration and has produced R-2.12.1 in 32 bits. Compiling R-2.12.1 for the 64 bits by configuring the config.site file as follow: CC="gcc -m64"

Author: mishra Repository: /hg/zfs-crypto/gate Revision: 4fe0619163c071a1d2de7f6d6c99569485758c3c Log message: 6312695 memnode.h deliverable is present on sun4u/sun4v but not on x86 platform. Files: update: usr/src/pkgdefs/SUNWhea/prototype_i386

Hello When I was using OpenSSH-2.9p2 in Solaris 8 sparcv9 (64bit) environment, I found some trouble that wtmpx has broken. The size of utmpx structure object becomes larger than 32 bit environment in sparcv9 environment.Therefore, instead of using utmpx structure object, using futmpx structure object is better. In sparcv9 environment, futmpx structure object is used instead of utmpx structure

On 2009-02-24 03:28, Kshitij Sudan wrote: > I am new to LLVM, and I'm trying to compile llvm and llvm-gcc from > subversion on a Solaris10/SPARC machine. I have already tried building > llvm-2.4 on this machine, but it failed. > > I then tried the subversion sources (rev. # 65253 fro llvm and > rev#65263 for llvm-gcc) and llvm at least builds correctly ( I however > have

Something strange happens when I compile the pre27 SSH: ocal/ssh//include -DETCDIR=\"/usr/local/ssh//etc\" \ -DSSH_PROGRAM=\"/usr/local/ssh//bin/ssh\" \ -DSSH_ASKPASS_DEFAULT=\"/usr/local/ssh//libexec/ssh/ssh-askpass\" \ -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -c atomicio.c In file included from includes.h:106, from atomicio.c:26: fake-socket.h:30: parse error before

On Mon, 7 Nov 2005, Bill Wendling wrote: > What's the config.log from this run? its attached. -Tanya > > -bw > > On 11/3/05, Tanya Lattner <tonic at nondot.org> wrote: >> >> Following the instructions here: >> http://llvm.cs.uiuc.edu/docs/TestingGuide.html#run >> >> I get an error running configure in the llvm-test directory. >>

I encountered a strange libzfs behavior while testing a zone fix and want to make sure that I found a genuine bug. I''m creating zones whose zonepaths reside in ZFS datasets (i.e., the parent directories of the zones'' zonepaths are ZFS datasets). In this scenario, zoneadm(1M) attempts to create ZFS datasets for zonepaths. zoneadm(1M) has done this for a long time (since

-------- Original Message -------- Subject: Sun Solaris 8 compile problem. Date: Thu, 06 Nov 2003 23:03:36 -0700 From: Jack Matthews <jmatthews@t-graphic.com> To: R-help@lists.R-project.org I am new to the list was wondering if anyone can help me find the reason and remedy for compiling R on an ultrasparc 60 solaris 8 with gcc 3.2.2 in 64 bit mode? Fails in checking for a fortran

I am new to LLVM, and I'm trying to compile llvm and llvm-gcc from subversion on a Solaris10/SPARC machine. I have already tried building llvm-2.4 on this machine, but it failed. I then tried the subversion sources (rev. # 65253 fro llvm and rev#65263 for llvm-gcc) and llvm at least builds correctly ( I however have not tried testing it!). I can execute binaries located in

I have probably trivial problem in OpenSSH installation, but do not see it - could you help, please ? The libcrypto has been installed. caroubier% ls -l /usr/local/ssl/lib/libcrypto.a -rw-r--r-- 1 root other 2778744 Nov 19 17:53 /usr/local/ssl/lib/libcrypto.a But the openssh stops with Can't find recent OpenSSL libcrypto. Thank you very much in advance, Elisabeth Porteneuve --

Hi everyone - I'm seeing a 32-bit build perform significantly faster (up to 3x) than a 64 bit build on Solaris 8. I'm running R version 2.1.0. Here are some of my system details, and some resulting timings: >uname -a SunOS lonetree 5.8 Generic_117350-16 sun4u sparc SUNW,Sun-Fire-V440 lonetree /home/sgilpin >gcc -v Reading specs from

I'm not familiar with Solaris, so take this with appropriate dose of NaCl... For the 64-bit build, why not have the -O2 for gcc, since you have it for g77 and g++? If you just run vanilla configure for the 32-bit build, I believe it uses -O2 for all three compilers by default. If that's the difference, perhaps it's sufficient to explain the performance difference. The other thing

Hi all, I've only pasted the last few lines of where the Xapian build fails below (the entire piece is 6639 lines long). I didn't get any warnings regarding zlib or libuuid from configure, so I'm assuming I have compatible versions. I am using libtool 2.2.6b, GNU ld 2.20.2010303. I know gcc 3.3.2 is a little behind the times, but I see the the documentation the minimum requirement is

I just went through a BFU update to snv_127 on a V880 : neptune console login: root Password: Nov 3 08:19:12 neptune login: ROOT LOGIN /dev/console Last login: Mon Nov 2 16:40:36 on console Sun Microsystems Inc. SunOS 5.11 snv_127 Nov. 02, 2009 SunOS Internal Development: root 2009-Nov-02 [onnv_127-tonic] bfu''ed from /build/archives-nightly-osol/sparc on 2009-11-03 I have [

IF you run solaris and opensolaris ?for example you my use c0t0d0 (for scsi disk) or c0d0 (for ide /SATA disk ) as the system disk. In default ,solaris x86 and opensolaris will use RAW driver : c0t0d0s0 (/dev/rdsk/c0t0d0s0) as the member driver of rpool. Infact, solaris2 partition can be more then one in each Hard Disk, so we also can use the RAW driver like : c0t0d0p1 (/dev/rdsk/c0t0d0p1)