similar to: [Bug 208] SCO build/runtime fixes

http://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=208 ------- Additional Comments From gert at greenie.muc.de 2002-04-08 07:30 ------- Created an attachment (id=65) cvs diff of "works on SCO 3.2v4" vs. -current ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.

http://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=208 Summary: SCO build/runtime fixes Product: Portable OpenSSH Version: -current Platform: ix86 OS/Version: other Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: Build system AssignedTo: openssh-unix-dev at mindrot.org ReportedBy: gert at

I'm considering commiting something like this. -------------------------------- --- configure.ac.old 2005-02-24 19:47:25.361190001 -0800 +++ configure.ac 2005-02-25 12:33:35.341390018 -0800 @@ -374,23 +374,7 @@ ;; # SCO UNIX and OEM versions of SCO UNIX *-*-sco3.2v4*) - CPPFLAGS="$CPPFLAGS -Dftruncate=chsize" [snip next 16 deleted lines] + AC_MSG_ERROR("This Platform

It looks like something got broken in openbsd-compat/bsd-snprintf.c ... gcc -g -O2 -Wall -Dftruncate=chsize -I/usr/local/include -I/usr/local/ssl/includ e -I. -I.. -I../src/openbsd-compat -I../src/openbsd-compat/.. -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -c ../src/openbsd-compat/bsd-snprintf.c In file included from ../src/openbsd-compat/bsd-snprintf.c:72:

Is anyone still using OpenSSH on SCO Open Server 3? My clients no longer run Open Server 3. The entropy gathering code changes have broken the Open Server 3 build. If there is still interest I'll work on it. If not, I have no need for it. -- Tim Rice Multitalents (707) 887-1469 tim at multitalents.net

There was a patch merged in on 9/29 that changed remove() calls to unlink(): - (djm) Merged big SCO portability patch from Tim Rice <tim at multitalents.net> Does SCO's libc not include remove()? Note that sftp-server.c is currently using remove. The reason I ask is I'd like to keep the portable tree as close to openbsd as possible, and if we need remove() for SCO we should

http://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=107 tim at multitalents.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution| |WORKSFORME ------- Additional Comments From tim at multitalents.net

http://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=229 tim at multitalents.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution| |DUPLICATE ------- Additional Comments From tim at multitalents.net

http://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=347 tim at multitalents.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution| |FIXED ------- Additional Comments From tim at multitalents.net 2002-07-15

http://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=348 tim at multitalents.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution| |FIXED ------- Additional Comments From tim at multitalents.net 2002-07-15

http://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=123 tim at multitalents.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|openssh-unix-dev at mindrot.org|tim at multitalents.net ------- Additional Comments From tim at multitalents.net 2002-02-26 16:58 ------- I've addressed this

http://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=102 tim at multitalents.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|openssh-unix-dev at mindrot.org|tim at multitalents.net ------- Additional Comments From tim at multitalents.net 2002-02-26 17:01 ------- I've addressed this

http://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=74 tim at multitalents.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|openssh-unix-dev at mindrot.org|tim at multitalents.net ------- Additional Comments From tim at multitalents.net 2002-02-26 17:03 ------- I've addressed this

http://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12 tim at multitalents.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|openssh-unix-dev at mindrot.org|tim at multitalents.net ------- Additional Comments From tim at multitalents.net 2002-02-26 17:07 ------- I've addressed this

subscribe openssh-unix-dev at mindrot.org > Send openssh-unix-dev mailing list submissions to > openssh-unix-dev at mindrot.org > > To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit > http://www.mindrot.org/mailman/listinfo/openssh-unix-dev > or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to > openssh-unix-dev-request at mindrot.org >

http://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=41 ------- Additional Comments From stevesk at pobox.com 2002-01-06 11:10 ------- a patch would speed up fixing this. can someone produce one? ------- Additional Comments From tim at multitalents.net 2002-02-26 08:22 ------- What platform do you have this problem on? SCO builds static binaries just fine. UnixWare doesn't have a chance due to

http://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=323 tim at multitalents.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |keith at ajmani.org ------- Additional Comments From tim at multitalents.net 2002-12-05 16:03 ------- *** Bug 449 has been marked as

http://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=45 ------- Additional Comments From tim at multitalents.net 2002-01-31 16:37 ------- Autoconf uses char (*f) (); in all it's AC_CHECK_FUNC tests. Seems like skey should be fixed. Feel free to provide a patch to autoconf.ac that uses AC_TRY_RUN instead of AC_CHECK_FUNC(skey_keyinfo, ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You

http://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=151 ------- Additional Comments From tim at multitalents.net 2002-03-09 04:16 ------- Does IRIX not have it's own getcwd()? ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.

http://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=246 ------- Additional Comments From tim at multitalents.net 2002-05-18 03:12 ------- Perhaps you are getting confused by the "MD5 password support: no" line. configure is reporting that in error as pointed out by Kagan Kongar <kongar at tsrsb.org.tr> Try removing line 2026 (MD5_MSG="no") of configure.ac and run autoconf.