Displaying 20 results from an estimated 110 matches similar to: "scp 3.1p1 problem on Solaris"
2002 Apr 11
3
getting OpenSSH/OpenSSL to utilize /dev/random
I've installed Sun's SUNWski package on Solaris 8 (32-bit) that provides a
/dev/random interface. It appears to as cat'ing it gives me a bunch of
well, random data.
However, when I ran my configure, it gives me the WARNING.RND message to the
effect that I'm using the built-in. I've seen allusions on this list to
building openssl with to get random support, so I rebuilt it
2002 Apr 10
2
Compiling OPENssh to use random package
Hello,
I have attempted several times to compile openssh3.1p1 that will use a
random package called ANDIrand. How can I compile and get ssh to use this
random number generator? I have tried the --rand-helper switch with my
configure and still it does not work. I am compiling in Solaris 8, and need
to then create a package that can be used on Solaris 6, Solaris 7, and
Solaris 8.
Thanks,
Eric
2002 Mar 07
2
OpenSSH-3.1p1 Solaris build with /dev/random
has anyone had a problem building 3.1p1 with Solaris 8 (2/02 release)?
That release of Solaris was the first (I believe) to incorporate their own
/dev/random which OpenSSH 3.1 doesn't seem to like too much. When I run
the configure, it reports that Random Number Source is set to use the
rand-helper. If I use the ANDIrand Solaris package as my /dev/random, It
configures properly (Random
2002 Feb 01
2
/dev/urandom
if i want to learn more about implementing a /dev/urandom,
where would be a good place to start?
thanks,
wendy
--
wendy palm
Cray OS Sustaining Engineering, Cray Inc.
wendyp at cray.com, 651-605-9154
2003 Dec 30
0
Re: +AFs-Asterisk-Users+AF0- RE: +AFs-Asterisk-Users+AF0- Multi-line, multi-registration phones
Here is an example of a couple of macros that help me where I have a SOHO with a
home phone line and a work phone line. If I pick up line 2 my work line I would
prefer the call I make to go out my office phone line same with if I pick up
line 1 my home phone line I would prefer it go out my home line but want it to
roll if needed. So with this little macro it is possible for that to happen.
2001 Jul 24
5
OpenSSH and Solaris with 0.9.6x openssl
Hello,
I have tried to install openssh 2.9p2 on Solaris 2.6 and Solaris 2.8
after compiling the openssl (both 0.9.6a and 0.9.6b) and openssh
software with both gcc 2.95.3, Sun's Forte compiler, Sun's linker, etc.
I have tried the zlib from Sun freeware and version 11.8.0
REV=2000.01.08.18.12 contained in the SUNWzlib package. Both openssh and
openssl appear to make properly and all the
2002 May 17
2
SSH 3.2.2 on Solaris 8 with /kernel/drv/random
Hi,
I'm like to try a get the new release to work with Sun's new device,
that can be installed with patch 112438-01.
I compiled SSL attempting to point it at the random device:
cd openssl-0.9.6d
./Configure solaris-sparcv7-gcc
make DEVRANDOM="/kernel/drv/random"
And then ran the SSH configure:
./configure --prefix=/opt/OBSDssh --with-pam --without-rsh \
--sysconfdir=/etc/ssh
2017 Aug 24
3
Are r2dtable and C_r2dtable behaving correctly?
Hello,
While doing some enrichment tests using chisq.test() with simulated
p-values, I noticed some strange behaviour. The computed p-value was
extremely small, so I decided to dig a little deeper and debug
chisq.test(). I noticed then that the simulated statistics returned by the
following call
tmp <- .Call(C_chisq_sim, sr, sc, B, E)
were all the same, very small numbers. This, at first,
2017 Aug 25
1
Are r2dtable and C_r2dtable behaving correctly?
> On 25 Aug 2017, at 10:30 , Martin Maechler <maechler at stat.math.ethz.ch> wrote:
>
[...]
> https://stackoverflow.com/questions/37309276/r-r2dtable-contingency-tables-are-too-concentrated
>
>
>> set.seed(1); system.time(tabs <- r2dtable(1e6, c(100, 100), c(100, 100))); A11 <- vapply(tabs, function(x) x[1, 1], numeric(1))
> user system elapsed
>
2002 Jul 24
3
OpenSSH 3.4p1 "PRNG is not seeded"
I upgraded from OpenSSH_3.0.2p1 to OpenSSH 3.4p1. Starting SSHD or
ssh-keygen I'm getting the "PRNG is not seeded".
I have verified that prngd is running and "egc.pl /var/spool/prngd/pool get"
runs just fine reporting 32800 bits of entropy.
My platform is Solaris 8 (sparc) and I downloaded binaries from
www.sunfreeware.com.
My guess is the build of OpenSSH 3.4.p1 is
2002 Sep 26
1
RNG question
Does anyone know how I can correct this error I am getting:
Not enough entropy in RNG
ssh-rand-helper child produced insufficient data
I am using openssh with solaris 8.
thanks,
Scott
2001 Feb 08
2
OpenSSH 2.3.0p4/2.2.0p1, Solaris 8, ssh-keygen bus error
Hi,
I'm having a problem with ssh-keygen on Solaris 8; upon running, it
produces a bus error due to a function call in OpenSSL (RC4_set_key):
[...]
(gdb) where
#0 0x3440c in RC4_set_key ()
#1 0x2b890 in arc4random_stir ()
at /merc/tools/src/openssh-2.3.0p1/bsd-arc4random.c:65
#2 0x23ca8 in main (ac=1, av=0xffbefb94)
at /merc/tools/src/openssh-2.3.0p1/ssh-keygen.c:720
I get
2001 Nov 06
1
Entropy and DSA key
On Tue, 6 Nov 2001, Dan Astoorian wrote:
> Date: Tue, 6 Nov 2001 13:23:58 -0500
> From: Dan Astoorian <djast at cs.toronto.edu>
> To: Dave Dykstra <dwd at bell-labs.com>
> Cc: Ed Phillips <ed at UDel.Edu>
> Subject: Re: Entropy and DSA key
>
> On Tue, 06 Nov 2001 10:54:12 EST, Dave Dykstra writes:
> > > On Mon, 5 Nov 2001, Ed Phillips wrote:
>
2001 Apr 27
0
key_verify failed for server_host_key from Solaris 2.7 to non-Solaris hosts
Hi,
I am using OpenSSH 2.5.2p2 on Solaris 2.7 (Ultra 10) with 64bit support and
have the following problem when connecting with the ssh2 protocol to
non-solaris OS:
On the client side, I do:
/local/work/lysis/bin/slogin -v -2 -p 2222 rs30
On the server side (AIX 4.3), the sshd runs as follows:
aix/sbin/sshd -p 2222 -d
Full output follows at the end of this mail.
The server is compiled with
2017 Aug 25
2
Are r2dtable and C_r2dtable behaving correctly?
It is not about "really arge total number of observations", but:
set.seed(4711);tabs <- r2dtable(1e6, c(2, 2), c(2, 2)); A11 <- vapply(tabs, function(x) x[1, 1], numeric(1));table(A11)
A11
0 1 2
166483 666853 166664
There are three possible matrices, and these come out in proportions 1:4:1, the one with all cells filled with ones being
most common.
Cheers, Jari
2003 Mar 03
2
sshd does not start
I hope I'm sending this to the correct group for resolution, if not please
direct to the appropriate place for openssh problems.
I complied openssh-3.5pl.tar on Solaris 8 OS system using gnu.
I installed the lastest version of openssl.
I did not install /www/gzip.org/zlib because I assumed that I probably have
that, since I have gunzip....
Openssh compiled but I kept receiving warnings that
2005 Jan 03
9
[Bug 968] OpenSSH 3.8p1 PRNG seed extraction failed error
http://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=968
Summary: OpenSSH 3.8p1 PRNG seed extraction failed error
Product: Portable OpenSSH
Version: 3.8p1
Platform: UltraSparc
OS/Version: SunOS
Status: NEW
Severity: major
Priority: P2
Component: scp
AssignedTo: openssh-bugs at mindrot.org
2005 Feb 16
11
[Bug 968] OpenSSH 3.8p1 PRNG seed extraction failed error
http://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=968
djm at mindrot.org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Attachment #760| |ok?
Flag| |
------- Additional Comments From djm at mindrot.org 2005-02-16 11:24 -------
2002 Mar 08
1
delete fails to delete everything it should like dangling symlinks
I think someone posted this before, but I can't find it in the archives.
I am using rsync to pull down source files to be compiled. The delete
options are used to clear out any old files left over from previous.
Normally this works. I've run into one case where it persistently fails.
Within the directory created during compiling is a symlink to another
directory, also created during
2002 May 25
2
mismatch against version of openssl, letter version brokeness
What risk exists in changing the check for the matching version of
openssl so that the final letter part of the version (e.g. 0.9.6c
vs. 0.9.6d) is ignored? Are there any security vulnerabilities in
such a thing? What if ssh(d) is linked against an older _letter_
version such as 0.9.6c and now finds the library is 0.9.6d? Is
there a security risk in that? Surely a major API change would not