similar to: [Bug 219] authorized_keys documentation

http://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=387 ------- Additional Comments From markus at openbsd.org 2002-08-22 06:27 ------- hm, the logoutput from the server would be more helpfull. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.

http://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=219 ------- Additional Comments From dtucker at zip.com.au 2003-06-28 14:52 ------- Created an attachment (id=340) --> (http://bugzilla.mindrot.org/attachment.cgi?id=340&action=view) Change authorized_keys description. How about something like the attached? Or should this bug be closed as WONTFIX? ------- You are receiving this mail

http://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=387 markus at openbsd.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|RESOLVED |REOPENED Resolution|FIXED | ------- Additional Comments From markus at openbsd.org 2003-02-07 08:16

http://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=220 ------- Additional Comments From markus at openbsd.org 2002-04-18 06:01 ------- i think i've seen this before and it was related to the realpath() implementation.... ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.

https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1864 Damien Miller <djm at mindrot.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |djm at mindrot.org Status|NEW |RESOLVED Blocks|

http://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=219 Summary: authorized_keys documentation Product: Portable OpenSSH Version: -current Platform: Other OS/Version: other Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: Documentation AssignedTo: openssh-unix-dev at mindrot.org ReportedBy:

http://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=179 markus at openbsd.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED ------- Additional Comments From markus at openbsd.org 2002-03-22 22:37 ------- hm, sshd is not sending channel data after

http://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=148 markus at openbsd.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED ------- Additional Comments From markus at openbsd.org 2002-03-08 08:10 ------- packet_read_expect(SSH2_MSG_NEWKEYS);

http://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=289 Summary: mmap error when trying to use 3.3p1 with privsep Product: Portable OpenSSH Version: 3.1p1 Platform: ix86 OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: major Priority: P2 Component: sshd AssignedTo: openssh-unix-dev at mindrot.org

http://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=454 ------- Additional Comments From markus at openbsd.org 2002-12-10 20:14 ------- hm, i think about adding ManglePort=yes to the options. This option will create Hostkeyaliases on the fly if the port is != 22, and use 'foor.bar.com at portXXX' as an alias. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for

subscribe openssh-unix-dev at mindrot.org > Send openssh-unix-dev mailing list submissions to > openssh-unix-dev at mindrot.org > > To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit > http://www.mindrot.org/mailman/listinfo/openssh-unix-dev > or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to > openssh-unix-dev-request at mindrot.org >

http://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=481 ------- Additional Comments From markus at openbsd.org 2003-02-02 00:11 ------- do you have a patch for the manpage? ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.

http://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1326 Summary: Allow non-public-key credentials in authorized_keys file (Kerberos, etc.) Product: Portable OpenSSH Version: 4.4p1 Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P2 Component: Kerberos support

http://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=486 ------- Additional Comments From markus at openbsd.org 2003-02-07 07:51 ------- are you using PAM? ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.

http://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=26 ------- Additional Comments From markus at openbsd.org 2002-08-23 08:21 ------- hm, what do you suggest? ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.

http://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=105 markus at openbsd.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED ------- Additional Comments From markus at openbsd.org 2002-02-07 06:54 ------- could you please try this without scp? e.g.

https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1908 Markus Friedl <markus at openbsd.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |markus at openbsd.org Attachment #2054|0 |1 is obsolete|

http://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=413 markus at openbsd.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED ------- Additional Comments From markus at openbsd.org 2003-02-03 19:50 ------- i'll look into this. ------- You are

http://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=988 Summary: sshd StrictModes check failed with fs acl Product: Portable OpenSSH Version: 3.9p1 Platform: ix86 OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: sshd AssignedTo: openssh-bugs at mindrot.org ReportedBy: coil93

http://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=148 markus at openbsd.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|markus at openbsd.org |openssh-unix-dev at mindrot.org ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug, or are