similar to: [Bug 203] New: X11 forwarding ignores GatewayPorts flag

http://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=203 ------- Additional Comments From dtucker at zip.com.au 2002-04-04 00:13 ------- Add "X11UseLocalhost no" to sshd_config on your server. More details can be found in the sshd man page. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.

http://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=173 Summary: sshd does not listen on tcp-socket, though GatewayPorts yes Product: Portable OpenSSH Version: 3.1p1 Platform: UltraSparc OS/Version: SunOS Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: sshd AssignedTo:

https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2222 Bug ID: 2222 Summary: GatewayPorts=no should not rewrite localhost addresses in port-forward requests Product: Portable OpenSSH Version: 6.5p1 Hardware: All OS: Linux Status: NEW Severity: minor Priority: P5

http://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=760 Summary: GatewayPorts clarification in _config man pages Product: Portable OpenSSH Version: 3.7p1 Platform: All OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: minor Priority: P2 Component: Documentation AssignedTo: openssh-bugs at mindrot.org

http://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1297 ted at midg3t.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Remote forwards do not bind |No feedback when remote |to the selected address |forward is localhost-only |

https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1297 Darren Tucker <dtucker at zip.com.au> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |dtucker at zip.com.au Attachment #1515| |ok+ Flags|

https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1297 --- Comment #4 from Damien Miller <djm at mindrot.org> 2008-06-12 18:18:50 --- Created an attachment (id=1515) --> (http://bugzilla.mindrot.org/attachment.cgi?id=1515) send notification in debug message Unfortunately there isn't any clean way for the server to inform the client - the best we can do is a debug message (see

https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1297 Damien Miller <djm at mindrot.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|RESOLVED |CLOSED --- Comment #6 from Damien Miller <djm at mindrot.org> --- Set all RESOLVED bugs to CLOSED with release

hi i have problems with the X11 forwarding, TCP port forwarding works fine: the tcp ports bind to ipv4 and ipv6 localhost, but the X11 port (6010) binds ONLY to the ipv6 localhost, which does not work with the normal ipv4 programs :-( is this a bug, or is this an hidden feature mfg hermann redhat 7.1: openSSH 3.2.2: [mrq1 at xxxx mrq1]$ ssh -X -L 10000:localhost:22 localhost Last login: Thu

No answers on secureshell at securityfocus.com I must be doing something wrong or the server seems to ignore my bind request. Port forwarding is working it just bind to all ips and ignores my bind request. I've also tried this with an rfc1918 address opposed to a loopback and had the same results. Google and the archive haven't helped. Thanks in advance for your time and consideration.

http://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=597 Summary: X11 Forwarding: sshd doesn't listen on unix domain sockets Product: Portable OpenSSH Version: -current Platform: All OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P2 Component: sshd AssignedTo:

I have the following line in the sshd_config file: GatewayPorts no If I launch the ssh client as this: ssh -l user host -R 9000:otherHost:25 the port forwarding is successful! :-( As you can see, the 'netstat -na' command shows the Secure Shell daemon listening to the port 9000. Active Internet connections (servers and established) Proto Recv-Q Send-Q Local Address

I just recently updated to 3.1p1 and it seems that some X11 forwarding connections are broken while others work. For instance xterm always works fine. But Synchronize (group calendar program) always crashes with the following error. This happens even if I disable access control using 'xhost +'. X11 connection rejected because of wrong authentication. Secondly, in going back to

Hi, I think we should try other AF for "x11_use_localhost" case. --- openssh-3.1p1/channels.c Tue Mar 5 10:57:45 2002 +++ openssh-3.1p1-fix/channels.c Thu May 2 21:26:28 2002 @@ -2356,6 +2356,13 @@ continue; } } +#ifdef IPV6_V6ONLY + if (ai->ai_family == AF_INET6) { + int on = 1; + if (setsockopt(sock, IPPROTO_IPV6, IPV6_V6ONLY, &on, sizeof(on)) < 0)

http://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=157 Summary: X11 Forwarding breaks Product: Portable OpenSSH Version: 3.1p1 Platform: HPPA OS/Version: HP-UX Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: sshd AssignedTo: openssh-unix-dev at mindrot.org ReportedBy: michael.exner at

I think I might have a bug here, but I''m not sure. I just cannot seem to win with X11 forwarding and OpenSSH-1.2.2! The shell works fine though. When I had the Linux 2.2.11 kernel running, sshd was saying: debug: Received request for X11 forwarding with auth spoofing. debug: Socket family 10 not supported [X11 disp create] debug: channel 0: new [X11 inet listener] debug: Forking

http://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=217 Summary: mdoc2man.pl puts wrong name into ssh.1 man page Product: Portable OpenSSH Version: 3.1p1 Platform: All OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: minor Priority: P2 Component: Documentation AssignedTo: openssh-unix-dev at mindrot.org

http://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=173 ------- Additional Comments From stevesk at pobox.com 2002-03-19 08:31 ------- see sshd.8 X11UseLocalhost ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.

Hi, I am using openssh 4.1 on AIX. I have noticed a strange behaviour with openssh X11 forwarding with respect to connection termination. The behaviour is seen during connection termination between the pseudo X11 socket (say 6010) opened by sshd on server which interacts with the X11 client application socket. I have compared the behaviour of two X11 applications 1. xterm 2. wish (tcl/tk

https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2473 Bug ID: 2473 Summary: sshd and -R port forwardings on 127.0.0.0/8 Product: Portable OpenSSH Version: 6.6p1 Hardware: Other OS: Linux Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P5 Component: sshd Assignee: unassigned-bugs at