similar to: [Bug 162] Tunneling of ssh over ssh seems broken

http://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=162 Summary: Tunneling of ssh over ssh seems broken Product: Portable OpenSSH Version: 3.1p1 Platform: ix86 OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: ssh AssignedTo: openssh-unix-dev at mindrot.org ReportedBy: jl at

Here is a patch to implement an exit delay in OpenSSH-3.0.2p1, proposed by John Hardin. This is his description of the feature: New option for OpenSSH: Delay before exit. Command line option: -S delay Config file option: sleep {delay} Purpose: Wait the specified number of seconds after last traffic before dropping the connection and exiting. If ports are forwarded, this causes the ssh client

Hi, the attached patch adds support for the keywords "OpenCommand" and "CloseCommand" to ssh_config. They are commands which are executed before the connection is established (or ProxyCommand started) and after the connection has been closed (or ProxyCommand ended). this is usefull for stuff like portknocking or (that's what I wrote the patch for) talking with trapdoor2

https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1039 Iain Morgan <imorgan at nas.nasa.gov> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |imorgan at nas.nasa.gov --- Comment #13 from Iain Morgan <imorgan at nas.nasa.gov> --- My apologies for

Mike Messick wrote: > Hi Kevin, > > You might take a look at openvpn instead - http://openvpn.net. > > I've had great success for 3+ years using openvpn on my samba server and > having windows machines accessing shares via the vpn link. Since openvpn > can use udp as well it provides a much more resilient transport for samba > traffic (At the cost of some throughput

http://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1039 Summary: Incomplete application of HostKeyAlias in ssh Product: Portable OpenSSH Version: 4.0p1 Platform: All OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: ssh AssignedTo: bitbucket at mindrot.org ReportedBy: cdmclain

Portable OpenSSH 2.5.1p1 has just been uploaded. It will be available from the mirrors listed at http://www.openssh.com/portable.html shortly. OpenSSH is a 100% complete SSH 1.3 & 1.5 protocol implementation and a 99% SSH 2 protocol implementation, including sftp client and server support. This release contains many portability bug-fixes (listed in the ChangeLog) as well as several new

Portable OpenSSH 2.5.1p1 has just been uploaded. It will be available from the mirrors listed at http://www.openssh.com/portable.html shortly. OpenSSH is a 100% complete SSH 1.3 & 1.5 protocol implementation and a 99% SSH 2 protocol implementation, including sftp client and server support. This release contains many portability bug-fixes (listed in the ChangeLog) as well as several new

I have been running the following (from a cron script with a non password authorized_key exchange) ... rsync -aP -vv --exclude=".*/" -e 'ssh -fN user at site.com.au -L 8873:127.0.0.1:873' rsync://localhost:8873/data/ /data/ ... and not getting much to happen as either evidenced in /var/log/rsyncd.log or as artefacts on the local file system. Then I started to execute the

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Hi, the following patch extends the user at host syntax on the ssh command line to allow an additional HostKeyAlias and Port to be given as a single argument, eg: ssh user at localhost%8022,www.tdl.com is equivalent to ssh -o 'HostKeyAlias www.tdl.com' -p 8022 user at localhost The patch is particularly useful when ssh is called from

Hi Martin, my name's Daragh, and I'm a renewal projects architect in the University of Chicago. I saw your name on a listserv - openssh-unix-dev. I was hoping you could lend some insight to a problem we're trying to solve. We are trying to find a way for an Oracle database to connect securely to a mainframe (OS/390 running Model204 DB) through ODBC (Open Database Connection

I have read several HOWTO's online that indicate one should be able to access a samba share over an ssh tunnel from a windows box with the following steps: 1. Stop the File and Print sharing services on the windows box 2. Create an ssh tunnel from the windows box to the samba server (port 139) 3. Connect to the samba server as if it were on 127.0.0.1 Unfortunately, doing this on any of my

Hi, I'm trying to connect to a samba server via an ssh tunnel. I'm running ssh on my W2K machine. If I try to connect from another machine that is running an OS called RiscOS and a NetBIOS client called LanMan98 then it works perfectly, but if I try to connect from the another Windows machine running XP, or from the W2k machine (uisng loopback), I get "Windows cannot find

Hi, Over the past few years, I've needed to establish a robust tunnel from work to home, trying to make it as secure as I can. Ultimately, I wound up developing three programs of varying complexity. Basically, every time I learned some new thing that made it work better either for the sake of security or robustness, I glued it into this stuff. It took too much work and research to get all

Hi, I have setup a rsync server with a rsync running as a deamon, due to security rules I cannot open the rsync standard port (873) in the firewall. We have to tunnel rsync through ssh. On the client side, which is linux kernel 2.4 I have made the following script, but ssh -i /home/ifao/bin/traveltest -f -C -L 2211:cib.ifao.net:8730 cytric@localhost sleep 1000 rsync -auz --password-file=rsync.cib

if I: ssh -fND localhost:6000 somebody at 192.168.56.5 -p PORTNUMBER from computer "A" to computer "B" [B = 192.168.56.5] then I can set the SOCKS proxy for e.g.: Firefox to use "localhost:6000" on computer "A". Ok. I can surf the web through "B". But: - Can anyone sniff the traffic of "A"? [e.g.: computers on same subnet as

Dear RSYNCians, I'm trying to rsync my labtop pc (let's assume A-computer) with my desktop pc (let's assume C-computer) through our firewall. In between there is one computer (let's assume B-computer) that has an open port, so I theoretically could connect via a tunnel. I checked the SSH- website and internet and so on but did not find an answer that works. I tried the

Hello everyone, please keep my CC'd, I'm not on the list. I've been using dovecot happily via an ssh tunnel. My mutt is configured to use IMAP, and the tunnel is as follows in my muttrc: set tunnel="ssh -q mymailhost 'MBOX_LOCKS=fcntl MAIL=/home/jlbec/mail /usr/libexec/dovecot/imap'" It should be pretty obvious that this logs into mymailhost as me (via SSH

Hi List, I have a szenario where I need to reach a host on the internet from a "firewalled" network but there is a HTTPS-proxy runnnig. As some people know you can tunnel all TCP-connections through this proxy because it can't decide if someone is really doing SSL or just Telnet to port 443 (or use SSH in our case). So I've written a patch for ssh to make it send the CONNECT

Hi! I recently started using ProxyCommand and noticed that it's not possible to specify a "none" value for it. I've already written a patch for that, but wanted to discuss the issue before posting the patch. The problem is the following: I'd like to use a ProxyCommand by default, but exclude some hosts. But as soon as I have Host * ProxyCommand /some/proxy/command %h %p