similar to: [Bug 132] New: connects to 1.2.2? vintage sshd sometimes gets "Server lies" about host key size off by 1 bit

http://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=132 ------- Additional Comments From dwd at bell-labs.com 2002-03-02 02:29 ------- Created an attachment (id=30) Patch against CVS of March 1, 2003 ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.

http://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=132 markus at openbsd.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|markus at openbsd.org |openssh-unix-dev at mindrot.org ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug, or are

Below is a patch against the current OpenBSD OpenSSH CVS to workaround a behavior I have observed when converting from SSH 1.2.27 to OpenSSH while using the same old RSA1 host key for protocol 1. In several cases I saw that old SSH sshd reported a host key size of 1024 bits when OpenSSH saw it as 1023 bits. Without the patch, when OpenSSH's ssh client connects to an old SSH sshd it warns

We started receiving this message in our production server. Warning: Server lies about size of server public key: actual size is 767 bits vs. announced 768. Warning: This may be due to an old implementation of ssh. When I looked in the list archives I see that there has been a conversation about this topic before back about a year ago. Currently we are going from Openssh version 3.4 to another

Hey Jarett, 2009/2/24 <jarett.stevens at usermail.com> > After upgrading to the 2.4.1 version, I wasn't able to read as many > variables from my UPS. After a bit of experimentation, I determined that > the firmware on my UPS was different than what is currently in the > apcsmart driver, though it had worked before. I located my firmware > version (5ZM), and added in

Hi There - New to the list, so hopefully I don't mess this up too much ... I am hoping maybe some of you can help me. I have a problem I'm trying to solve regarding customer accounts, attrition and forecasting. Basically, here is what I want to do (not sure of the best way): 1. Track accounts by vintage (i.e., the month of the date of sale). 2. Forecast total accounts at a given time

https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1290 Darren Tucker <dtucker at zip.com.au> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|RESOLVED |CLOSED --- Comment #11 from Darren Tucker <dtucker at zip.com.au> 2010-03-26 10:51:25 EST --- With the

http://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1290 Summary: sshd dies if passed host key with relative path on command line Product: Portable OpenSSH Version: 4.5p1 Platform: All OS/Version: FreeBSD Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: sshd AssignedTo: bitbucket at

https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1592 Damien Miller <djm at mindrot.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |djm at mindrot.org --- Comment #1 from Damien Miller <djm at mindrot.org> --- Can you reproduce this with a

https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1592 --- Comment #2 from doerges at pre-sense.de --- I don't know. Somehow the reproducer seems to be damaged. $ file prob.tar.gz prob.tar.gz: data $ gunzip prob.tar.gz gzip: prob.tar.gz: not in gzip format $ sha256sum prob.tar.gz 0b505d2c32adf3b714c5adeb7cc3f6589d3506ee086aa2dc2bddc5e518ba8198 prob.tar.gz -- You are receiving this mail

https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1592 Damien Miller <djm at mindrot.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution|--- |WORKSFORME Status|NEW |RESOLVED --- Comment #3 from Damien Miller <djm at

http://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1290 --- Comment #3 from Damien Miller <djm at mindrot.org> 2007-05-18 16:58:40 --- Created an attachment (id=1288) --> (http://bugzilla.mindrot.org/attachment.cgi?id=1288) require absolute paths It is pretty easy to fix the specific case of the '-h' option not accepting relative paths, but fixing the more general problem of

https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1592 Summary: Fingerprints for SSHD host key don't match (local ssh-keygen -l vs. ssh localhost) Product: Portable OpenSSH Version: 5.1p1 Platform: Other OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: sshd

Hi all, I noticed that openssh5.5 finally revised this bug, pls check the bugzilla https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1290 but when i test it both on linux and hp-ux, it will still fails: In hp-ux, server side: root at sshia2# /opt/ssh/sbin/sshd -p 1234 -D -h ssh_host_dsa_key -ddd .......... debug3: send_rexec_state: entering fd = 9 config len 322 debug3: ssh_msg_send: type

<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.1//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml11/DTD/xhtml11.dtd"> <html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"> <head><meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8" /><style type="text/css"><!-- #msg dl { border: 1px #006 solid; background: #369; padding:

https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1853 Summary: sshd doesn't seem to be able to auth a user using an rsa key of 20000 bit Product: Portable OpenSSH Version: 5.7p1 Platform: All OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: sshd AssignedTo:

Hello openssh developers, I was builiding openssh-4.7p, and it builds successfully with my own prefix (--prefix=/path/to/sshd). The problem is when I execute sshd, it warns about permission being too open: hostname:/path root# /path/to/sshd -t -f /path/to/sshd_config @@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@ @ WARNING: UNPROTECTED PRIVATE KEY FILE! @

Hi all, this is my first post in this mailing group. I hope that anyboby could help me parsing a xml file. I found this website http://www.omegahat.org/RSXML/gettingStarted.html but unfortunately my XML file is not as easy as the one in the example. Example: <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?> <?xml-stylesheet

On 2003.08.05 12:18:04 -0700, Dave Tweten wrote: > I just received a PGP signed message, supposedly from > security-officer@freebsd.org, for which I did not have the matching public > key. Reflexively, I fetched it, and then began looking into it with an > eye toward signing it so PGP would no longer call it "untrusted." > > To my shock, I found I had two public

On 7/28/2016 5:11 PM, geo.inbox.ignored wrote: > i would very much like to install 7-32 why? your 2009 vintage low end mass market laptop is hopelessly underpowered by today's standards, you should stick with software thats approximately as old as it is. however, the Semperon SI-42 is, I believe, a 64 bit capable CPU, so why not run native x86_64 win 7 on it? -- john r pierce,