similar to: COPY_SIZE #define

I find the negative attitude toward CBQ to be distracting and non-professional in the HOWTO. I''ve re-read it for the first time in about a month and comments like "This can be configured in a variety of ways, which I do not understand. Use HTB" do not encourage me about the writer. This is not a personal critique, as I can imagine this being said on a personal website,

I have had a brief discussion with Damien Miller (below) about storing host port values in the known_hosts file so as to track multiple ssh sessions (with independant keys) that run on a single host but accept connections on different ports. If it were possible to state that a given key for a remote host belonged to that host's ssh session on port 23 and that another key belonged to that

Hello everyone, I have a problem regarding gre tunneling, I have two linux box both of them has a private network and the linux A is connected to the internet via wireless radio and the other linux B is connected to the internet via lease line. Here is the setup of my two linux box Linux A eth0 = 203.189.x.1 (internet) eth1 = 192.168.1.1 (going to hub private network) Linux B eth0 = 205.198.x.1

Hello, it seems, that filtering on nexthdr (TCP/UDP) content, especially src or dst port, is not working. The following has no effect on 2.4.16 or older (even 2.2) kernels: # tc filter add dev eth0 parent ffff: protocol ip prio 50 u32 match tcp dst 3128 0xffff police rate 40kbit burst 10k drop flowid :1 Even if # tc filter ls dev eth0 parent ffff: filter protocol ip pref 50 u32 filter protocol

Hi, for interested in participation on finishing new HTB developement I created simple docs regarding it. It is some insight into CBQ and HTB workings and problems. See luxik.cdi.cz/~devik/qos/htb/v3/

We are using OpenSSH (portable) version 3.0.1p1 on Linux 2.2.14-10 with RedHat's distribution of PAM 0.72-20.6.x for rsync'ing RRDTool data between two machines (among other things). When running 'rsync -essh -avz', everything works fine but the system log on the sshd side shows: PAM_pwdb[8021]: authentication failure; (uid=0) -> rrd for sshd service sshd[8021]: Accepted

I downloaded the HTB and ESFQ packages and installled the patched kernel and tools. Now can someone give me an example how to configure my system so that the 512Kbit are fairly divided for each computer ? Assume that eth0 is the interface on the WAN side and eth1 on the LAN side. Thanks _______________________________________________ LARTC mailing list / LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl

I have two servers on a network that need to intercommunicate a lot (file sharing and authentication information). I''d like to prioritise that traffic on them from their other network traffic, but I don''t want to think in terms of necessarily fixing bandwidths; I just want the inter-server communication to go out first if there''s a backlog. I could decide, I guess,

Hello there, i am continuing with the development of the iproute GUI. I was wondering if there is a xml parser for the set up of the queues. I have been searching but i cant find any... anyone?

Hello all! As far as I know that the traffic that will pass thru the router is balanced so that all connections have the same privilegies. Is it possible to configure the linux based router so that all computers will have the same privilegies? I mean that if in default case full traffic is splitted by connections, so I need to split it by users to prevent one user occupy all traffic by starting

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Hi, what''s the diferences between HTB and CBQ? Bye - -- ======================================== Netsite S/A - Security Officer Profissional Certificado Conectiva Linux www.kidmumu.com.br - UIN 4553082 ======================================== -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux) Comment: For info see

The included patch for openssh 3.0.2p1 implements overlapping read requests for the sftp client. It should be able to handle weird cases such as shriking files and reordered responses. This is only the first shot, and I'd be happy for any comments. I plan to implement something similar for the write path if this works out well. The maximum number of outstanding requests is quite high at

I have a dual-homed firewall. It has 2 Internet connections, provided by different ISPs (each with an associated IP address). The 2 Internet connections are connected to the same physical interface. The 2 Internet connections do NOT have equal bandwidth How do I configure the SNAT/MASQ and ensure sharing of the gateways with the correct ratio of usage and with the correct source IP address? I

PS, that patch, as should be obvious when viewed, is against the portable OpenSSH. I do not have any *BSD boxen so I can't test patches against unpatched OpenSSH. -- Michael T. Babcock CTO, FibreSpeed Ltd. (Hosting, Security, Consultation, Database, etc) http://www.fibrespeed.net/~mbabcock/

Folks, I've noticed poor performance using sftp. If anyone has any advice on how to improve performance, I'd like to hear it. Test simply involved transferring a single 143MB MP3 file using defaults for all the program configs. The opensshd 3.0.2p1 server is used in all tests. Software: openssh suite 3.0.2p1 psftp (putty sftp client) latest dev snapshot pscp (putty scp client) latest

> From: "CIT/Paul" <xerox@foonet.net> > Any help would be greatly appreciated :) This is much better than SFQ :> Sounds like SFQ to me. Can you tell us what the differences are?

Ext3 Journal oops & RAID-1 set losing sync. (Sent to both EXT3 and Linux-RAID since both are in use and seem possibly relevant) I have had a number of problems maintaining a software RAID-1 set on an IDE box I maintain; it seems that doing raidhotadd on the drive marked as invalid works each time though. However, I've had both errors about trying to read past the end of the

While I''m thinking about that review of howto changes, here are a few other responses about things I don''t believe. I''ll be interested in more info if anyone has any. ==== [from new doc] Besides being classful, CBQ is also a shaper and it is in that aspect that it really doesn''t work very well. It should work like this. I''ve not noticed that it

Can someone tell me what concept I''m missing here. The setup is simple. I have two default routes after ifup operations. I use "ip route del" to remove one, but then decide to add it back. The attempt is refused. Why? # ip route ls 66.95.83.208/28 dev eth1 proto kernel scope link src 66.95.83.210 65.84.205.96/27 dev eth2 proto kernel scope link src 65.84.205.104

Background ---------- A complaint I'm hearing is that some tools which take a long time to run (virt-resize in particular) need to have progress bars to indicate how long they are expected to run. This is also a basic usability principle, see for example this paper: http://www.chrisharrison.net/projects/progressbars/ProgBarHarrison.pdf If you look at how virt-resize is implemented, the bulk