similar to: Issues with SFTP

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 10000 matches similar to: "Issues with SFTP"

2002 Mar 28
2
[Bug 181] Undocumented mget and mput in sftp
http://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=181 ------- Additional Comments From jason at rndpkt.org 2002-03-28 15:26 ------- mget and mput are just "aliased" commands to get and put, I'm assuming for some kind of compatability. mget and mput expect the get and put parameters and DO NOT function like FTP-based mget and mput (i.e. mget file1 file2.. file#). I'd be happy
2009 Aug 31
1
mput/mget misbehavior
A couple of notes about mget/mput in SFTP (5.1p1). 1. They aren't documented in the SFTP man page 2 They misbehave -- "mput a.txt b.txt" copies a.txt to b.txt on the server "mput *.txt b.txt" copies the first wildcard match to b.txt on the server "mput a.txt b.txt c.txt" copies a.txt to b.txt on the server "mput a.txt
2009 Feb 10
2
Restrict commands available in an SFTP session
I am currently running OpenSSH 4.3. I would like to restrict the commands SFTP users can run to a list. For example, "put, get, mput, mget, mkdir, rmdir, and rm". Is this possible with OpenSSH? I have seen many posts concerning chroot'ing and the Forced Command option, but none of these solution address restricting the commands actually available inside the SFTP subsystem. Any
2020 Aug 21
4
smbclient mask command seems not to work the same way with recurse ON for mget and mput
Dear folks. I am using smbclient 4.2.10 version (the one packaged for OEL 6, samba4-client-4.2.10-15.el6.x86_64), and observing a weird behaviour of the tool. I've got a Linux local directorio, say /tmp/eraseme, with a couple of subdirectories in it, say a and b, each one containing a dummy file, say a/AM.xls and b/AT.xls If I run: smbclient -d 30 -l /var/log/samba -m SMB3 -W
2020 Aug 24
4
smbclient mask command seems not to work the same way with recurse ON for mget and mput
A new update. Same behaviour with 4.6.16. Exact issue as Bug 1249. Many thanks. Kind regards. El lun., 24 ago. 2020 a las 12:23, LPC DPG (<lpcdpg at gmail.com>) escribi?: > Dear folks. > > Was hoping it had to do with the release, but have also tested in 4.4.16 > and the issue is also there. I am aware a RHEL/CEntOS based upon 6 > distribution is not the most up to date
2020 Aug 24
2
smbclient mask command seems not to work the same way with recurse ON for mget and mput
Dear fellows. Another piece of information. The issue reprduces on RHEL 7.7, Samba 4.9.1 [root at vnhprerhds01 ~]# cat /etc/redhat-release Red Hat Enterprise Linux Server release 7.7 (Maipo) [root at vnhprerhds01 ~]# smbclient -V Version 4.9.1 [root at vnhprerhds01 ~]# smbclient -W "${d}" -U "${u}" "${s}" "${p}" Try "help" to get a list of
2020 Aug 25
2
smbclient mask command seems not to work the same way with recurse ON for mget and mput
Dear Andrew. You are right, I should have taken a deeper look into the standard output during compilation. I did just assume source4 was the one for Samba4. Anyway, besides the source confusion (really, even if I had found the right one, following the code would have been out of my reach), I don't seem to find how that is related with the documentation issue, or the mput/mask/recurse
2020 Aug 25
1
smbclient mask command seems not to work the same way with recurse ON for mget and mput
Dear all. I would like to propose a possible way to make mget and mput behave more or less the same way, rather that just changing documentation. Please, bear in mind this is a poor attempt coming from a person with no C skills at all, so other than testing that only filtered files are transferred, I have not gone further. Hope at least to have been able not to corrupt any pointer, but I'm
2001 Feb 23
1
Problem with mput * on Tru64 ?
Samba 2.0.7 running on Compaq Tru64 UNIX V5.0A with latest tru64 patches. "mget *" works OK, "mput *" or something like "mput *.bat" fails with the error message "find: bad option -maxdepth". Several questions - Anyone else come across this one? Would dropping back to 2.0.6 fix the problem? Could it be an issue with 2.0.7 on Tru64 V5? Regards, Brian
2007 Mar 14
1
How to enable download via web browser with vsftpd?
HI , I setup vsftp yesterday as a local user only mode. No anonymous was enabled. I set up this vsftpd on my machine running CentOS 4.4. its ip is 192.168.101.25. so when I login as ftp://192.168.101.25/ via web browser, I am promted the username as password. After inputing username and password, I can login successfully. Then I can download everything as usual. But I can not upload any data ?
2019 Jan 23
3
sftp Vs scp
Damien, Reading the various articles about https://sintonen.fi/advisories/scp-client-multiple-vulnerabilities.txt have caused me to question the wisdom of using scp. Your observation: > Date: Tue, 22 Jan 2019 13:48:34 +1100 (AEDT) > From: Damien Miller <djm at mindrot.org> > Subject: Re: Status of SCP vulnerability > > "Don't use scp with untrusted
2020 Aug 24
2
smbclient mask command seems not to work the same way with recurse ON for mget and mput
Dear Jeremy. Really appreciate you took your time to answer. I had already reviewed source4/client/client.c looking for mput (cmd_mput) command, but unluckily saying that my C programming skills are poor woud be really overrating them. I'm sorry to disagree for two reasons 1-. It works for mget, true that the source code is completely different. 2-. If taking a look into smbclient man
2001 Mar 02
3
Sftp client improvements
Hello, I want to know are there any plans on the sftp client (not server) improvents? Previously I was using ssh-2.4 packages (non-commercial) and they have Fantastic sftp client. And when I've moved to openssh I found that openssh sftp client functionality is more poor then ordinary ftp client have! Here is some of the features I think, developers must concentrate on: 1. Include
2019 Jan 24
5
sftp Vs scp
On Jan 24 03:47, Malcolm wrote: > Quoting Chris High <highc at us.ibm.com>: > > > caught my eye. Do you see any 'advantage' to using sftp with an untrusted > > server? If so, any thoughts about making an easy way to disable scp both > > client and server side when doing an installation? > > SFTP allows file resume, while scp does not. If this
2004 Mar 28
2
Samba 3 OK at smbclient, Windows fails
Hi everybody, I failed to make Samba 3.0.0 /3.0.2a working from Windows side on the slightly different Slackware?s. Last try was the ?current? Slackware version(kernel 2.4.25) of some March 20?s with Samba 3.0.2a in it. Server: Asus P4P800-PIV?RAM 1.5(1)Gb- 3Com 3C940 integrated. Client(s): W2k SP3, Realtek 8139 NIC. Installed OK (binaries from a distribution?), user added OK after
1997 Dec 08
1
Samba - Amiga, smbclient recurs problem
Hi All, I'm an Amiga user of samba. All is well with server and client except recursive mput within smbclient. It transfers nothing, and reports no errors. Can anyone help? My samba version is 1.9.16p9. More detail: I started with BIN: pointing to amitcp:samba/bin in which I placed sh, as recommended. I found without recurs set that mput #? (or mput *) reported that it could not find ls
2006 Mar 08
12
favorite FTP client of railers
Hi, Which FTP client would fit in nicely with OS X and Textmate. Thanks, Peter
2002 Mar 22
0
[Bug 181] New: Undocumented mget and mput in sftp
http://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=181 Summary: Undocumented mget and mput in sftp Product: Portable OpenSSH Version: 3.1p1 Platform: All OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: trivial Priority: P5 Component: sftp AssignedTo: openssh-unix-dev at mindrot.org ReportedBy: Maldoror at
2003 May 15
2
smbclient -c options
I'm trying to get a recursive file listing with smbclient: smbclient //host/share -Uusername%password -c "ls -alFR" But I get an error: NT_STATUS_NO_SUCH_FILE listing \-alFR Evidently, smbclient thinks I'm asking for a file mask. Is there a way to get a recursive file listing on a samba share so I can pipe it to wc -l for a file count? Ideally, I'd like to: (This won't
2002 Jul 19
0
[Bug 181] Undocumented mget and mput in sftp
http://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=181 mouring at eviladmin.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution| |WONTFIX ------- Additional Comments From mouring at eviladmin.org