similar to: Using OpenSSH through a SOCKS compatible firewall on your LAN

Whoever can help me... pls find attached the loggings for the openssh sessions from local(host=keg;redhat linux) to remote (host=ben;lynxos) The issue is when I run sshd in debug mode and try to logon from local, password authentication succeeds, but if I run sshd as a daemon, it fails. sshlocal.txt >>> logging at local when sshd is not run with debug option sshlocal...txt >>

okay, i reversed that patch out and solaris 7 still works fine with pam... devon ----- Original Message ----- From: <mouring at etoh.eviladmin.org> To: <devon at admin2.gisnetworks.com> Sent: Thursday, February 22, 2001 10:43 AM Subject: Re: Solaris and Latest snapshot (2001-02-21) (fwd) > > > ---------- Forwarded message ---------- > Date: Wed, 21 Feb 2001 17:54:19

This is the final results of sftp on SCO OpenServer. ---------- Forwarded message ---------- Date: Mon, 26 Feb 2001 12:27:51 -0700 From: Greg Jewell <gjewell at cnnxn.com> To: mouring at etoh.eviladmin.org Subject: RE: Problems with sftp under SCO OpenServer > -----Original Message----- > From: mouring at etoh.eviladmin.org [mailto:mouring at etoh.eviladmin.org] > Sent: Monday,

Who ever owns this server can you please correct this issue. Filtering 'spam' based on subject like is extremely stupid, and I'm getting tired of getting this email every other message. - Ben ---------- Forwarded message ---------- Date: Fri, 8 Nov 2002 14:18:13 -0000 From: NAIBTX002SBAYECEX005 at btx002.bt.com To: mouring at etoh.eviladmin.org Subject: ALERT - GroupShield ticket

On Fri, 30 Apr 2004, YOSHIFUJI Hideaki / [iso-2022-jp] $B5HF#1QL@(B wrote: > In article <Pine.BSO.4.44.0404292059520.953-100000 at etoh.eviladmin.org> (at Thu, 29 Apr 2004 21:00:26 -0500 (CDT)), Ben Lindstrom <mouring at etoh.eviladmin.org> says: > > > Be that true.. then one should review the usage of it in sshconnect.c > > which is the other place we do it. >

I dug through the list archives to see if this had come up before, and I see that a bug <http://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=393> was submitted and subsequently closed (basically rejected) in 2002. The basic issue, for those of you who don't feel like following the bug URL, is that when one has ssh servers behind a NAT, each of which responds to a different port on the NAT IP,

On Mon, Jul 23, 2001 at 12:49:14AM +0100, Matthew Vernon wrote: > ------- start of forwarded message ------- > From: <mouring at etoh.eviladmin.org> > To: Matthew Vernon <matthew at empire.ucam.org> > cc: <openssh-unix-dev at mindrot.org> > Subject: Re: [patch] GNU/Hurd compatibility patches > Date: Sun, 22 Jul 2001 12:39:32 -0500 (CDT) > > > We

Ermmm.. bugzilla does not like return emails.=) ---------- Forwarded message ---------- Date: Wed, 23 Jan 2002 00:25:05 -0600 (CST) From: mouring at etoh.eviladmin.org To: bugzilla-daemon at mindrot.org Subject: Re: [Bug 75] Error compiling in ssh-agent.c > ------- Additional Comments From djm at mindrot.org 2002-01-23 17:16 ------- > AFAIK atexit() should only take one arg. It looks

Can anyone offer any advice on this issue? We've tried patching sshd to have a maximum 10 second timeout when calling select() in serverloop.c, and this doesn't appear to have had any ill effects. Thanks, Paul ------- Forwarded Message Date: Tue, 18 Sep 2001 16:49:40 -0700 From: Paul Menage <pmenage at ensim.com> To: mouring at etoh.eviladmin.org cc: Paul Menage

Comments from the rest of the Solaris group? - Ben ---------- Forwarded message ---------- Date: Tue, 20 Feb 2001 11:20:33 +0100 From: Volker Paulsen <paulsen at orbiteam.de> To: mouring at etoh.eviladmin.org Subject: Linker flags in 2.5.1p1... While I'm compiling 2.5.1p1, I've got the following remarks: Host: sparc-sun-solaris2.7 Compiler: cc Compiler

Well, I've finally gotten around to compiling and testing OpenSSH 2.5.2p1, in order to update the contrib/solaris packaging scripts. Somehow on my test system, I'm getting errors that indicate that I've still got some old copy of OpenSSL being found somewhere...but I can't for the life of me tell where. The compile went fine (it found the OpenSSL 0.9.5a libraries that I had

Hi, It is a shame I feel obliged to write this email. I sent a single email with a possible bug in it, asking if it was working in a newer release. I got 3 spam emails from mindrot.org. Two asking me to confirm, and then when I was forced to confirm I got another auto-responder spam. If I had wanted the 3rd spam I would have set "return receipt". I got this (below) auto-responder

Attached is a very small patch that allows the ssh clients to use the socks5 library. It should work with socks4 but is untested. Tested on linux only configure --with-socks configure --with-socks5 Also included is a configure option to disable scp statistics --disable-scp-stats modified files openssh-2.9.9p2/acconfig.h openssh-2.9.9p2/channels.c openssh-2.9.9p2/configure.in

I am using sftp which comes with OpenSSH_3.8.1p1 Debian-8.sarge.4, OpenSSL 0.9.7e 25 Oct 2004 I noticed backspace is not working. Couild someone tell me if this is fixed in a newer package please? Also, would it be possible for sftp --version to be implemented? also sftp --V. Likewise ssh --version is not implemented either. None of the flags are listed when i type ssh --help, or sftp --help

Hi Ben, I test the command sshd -d -d -d several times and mostly the sshd-Daemon not started and sometimes the sshd-Daemon started, with the message: debug1: Seeded RNG with 16 bytes from programs debug1: Seeded RNG with 3 bytes from system calls debug1: sshd version OpenSSH_2.9p1 debug1: private host key: #0 type 0 RSA1 debug1: Bind to port 22 on 0.0.0.0. Server listening on 0.0.0.0 port 22.

Greetings, complete debug below > -----Original Message----- > From: Ben Lindstrom [mailto:mouring at etoh.eviladmin.org] > Sent: 10 July 2003 03:32 > To: Vikash Badal - PCS > Cc: 'openssh-unix-dev at mindrot.org' > Subject: Re: OpenSSH 3.6.1p2 +UnixWare 7.1.1 +SSH2 + > PasswordAuthentication no + PermitEmptyPasswords yes (followup) > > > > Would be

> Hello > I complied openssh like this "./configure --with-pam" and I did configure > /etc/pam.conf as follows > # PAM configuration > # > # Authentication management > # > sshd auth required /lib/security/pam_securid.so reserve > sftp auth required /lib/security/pam_securid.so reserve > # > login auth required

I've tried to run a Tukey post-hoc but keep getting this weird error, whether the aov was significant or not. treat_code is a dummy variable, but that shouldn't matter. Any suggestions? Thanks Amy > summary(aov(EtoH~treat_code, mydata)) Df Sum Sq Mean Sq F value Pr(>F) treat_code 1 16.44 16.44 11.027 0.001014 ** Residuals 287 427.91 1.49 --- Signif.

For what I can see there is no socks support built in in wine and also if u try to force socks tunneling through tsocks the windows program are not "socksifed". You can run freecap inside wine and then run through freecap the socksified program and this way it works, but I think it will be a nice to have feature to be able to run through socks. I've already implemented socks

Sorry...I deleted the thread about SOCKS before I realized I knew the solution... I checked up on how SMB connections work on an NT workstation running the Hummingbird SOCKS proxy. It looks like "net use..." and its GUI variant don't use the WINSOCK/WINSOCK 2 interface to make netbios-session (139/tcp) connections. The machine attempted to make a direct connection to the remote