similar to: des_ssh1_setiv not setting the IV ?

While rototilling packet.c, I did some looking at cipher_encrypt in cipher.c. It ends up that for SSH_CIPHER_NONE in cipher_encrypt, it uses memcpy. However, it also appears that dest and src can be equal in cipher_encrypt. On most sane libc implementations, memcpy == memmove. However, ANSI C makes no such guarantee, and some implementations out there are bound to try to optimize memcpy

Dear R users,    my question concerns my interest in comparing the beta coefficients between two identical regression models in two (actually 3) groups. Disclaimer: I am quite new to R, so I might be missing some terminology that I have not come across.   I am trying to find out if I can easily implement a Wald test in R for this, but the only relevant thing that I came across is this link

Dear all,  I hope this is the right place to ask this question. I am reviewing a research where the analyst(s) are using a linear regression model. The dependent variable (DV) is a continuous measure. The independent variables (IVs) are a mixture of linear and categorical variables. The author investigates whether performance (DV - continuous linear) is a function of age (continuous IV1 -

Dear all,  I hope this is the right place to ask this question. I am reviewing a research where the analyst(s) are using a linear regression model. The dependent variable (DV) is a continuous measure. The independent variables (IVs) are a mixture of linear and categorical variables. The author investigates whether performance (DV - continuous linear) is a function of age (continuous IV1 -

# I've tried to make this easy to paste into R, though it's probably so simple you won't need to. # I have some data (there are many more variables, but this is a reasonable approximation of it) # here's a fabricated data frame that is similar in form to mine: my.df <- data.frame(replicate(10, round(rnorm(100, mean=3.5, sd=1)))) var.list <- c("dv1",

Does anyone know if there is a way to run multivariate linear regression in R? I tried using the lm function (e.g., lm(dv1, dv2~iv1+iv2+iv3), but got error messages. Is my syntax wrong, or do I need a particular package? Thanks, Jeff-- ________________________________________________________ Jeffrey J. Lusk, Ph.D. Postdoctoral Research Associate Department of Forestry &

Hello! I have data containing a large number of probabilities (about 60) of nonzero coefficients to predict 10 different independent variables (in 10 different BMA models). i've arranged these probabilities in a matrix like so: (IV1) (IV2) (IV3) ... p(b0) p(b0) p(b0) p(b1) p(b1) p(b1) p(b2) p(b2) p(b2) ... where p(b1) for independent variable 1 is p(b1 !=

Hi, I would like to simulate data with a binary outcome and a set of predictors that are correlated. I want to be able to fix the number of event (Y=1) vs. non-event (Y=0). Thus, I fix this and then simulate the predictors. I have 2 questions: 1. When the predictors are continuous, I can use mvrnorm(). However, if I have continuous, ordinal and binary predictors, I'm not sure how to simulate

Greetings, Apologies for such a simple question, but I have been trying to figure this out for a few days now (I'm quite new to R), have read manuals, list posts, etc., and not finding precisely what I need. I am accustomed to working in Stata, but I am currently working through the multilevel package right now. In Stata, I would include the statement "if model1 == 1" at the end

Which cases does this pass handle which aren't otherwise optimized out by passes like GlobalValueNumbering or DeadCodeElimination? Thanks, Jake VanAdrighem On Thu, Sep 10, 2015 at 2:35 PM, Steve King <steve at metrokings.com> wrote: > Hello LLVM, > It seems this thread has gone cold. Is there some low risk way for > the community to take the new pass for a test drive? >

On Wed, Sep 2, 2015 at 5:36 AM, James Molloy <james at jamesmolloy.co.uk> wrote: > Hi, > > Coremark really isn't a good enough test - have you run the LLVM test suite > with this patch, and what were the performance differences? For the test suite single source benches, the 235 tests improved performance, 2 regressed and 705 were unchanged. That seems very optimistic.

Dear all, I try to conduct a SEM / two stage least squares regression with the following equations: First: X ~ IV1 + IV2 * Y Second: Y ~ a + b X therein, IV1 and IV2 are the two instruments I would like to use. the structure I would like to maintain as the model is derived from economic theory. My problem here is that I have trouble solving the equations to get the reduced form so I can run

I've done a decent size update of the OpenSSH portable from the upstream tree. There is an AES upgrade that needs to take place, but I need people to test and tell me what endedness changes need to be applied (if any). Attached is the patch. It is geared towards the latter snapshots..Unsure how it will patch (if at all) against 2.9pX series. Thanks. - Ben "This is dark day in

Hi Steve, Do you primarily find this to help for nested loops? If so, that could be because LSR explicitly bails out of processing them: // Skip nested loops until we can model them better with formulae. if (!L->empty()) { DEBUG(dbgs() << "LSR skipping outer loop " << *L << "n"); return; } I don't know how much time you're

Hi all. Solaris 10's default libcrypto does not have support for AES 192 and 256 bit functions. The attached patch, against -current, and based partially on an earlier one by djm, will use OpenSSH's builtin rijndael code for all AES crypto functions and thus will allow it to build and function on Solaris 10 without the extra crypto packages (SUNWcry, SUNWcryr) or a locally built OpenSSL.

Add private key protection information extraction to shh-keygen using -v option on top of -y option which is already parsing the private key. Technically, the passphrase isn't necessary to do this, but it is the most logical thing to do for me. Adding this to -l option is not appropriate because fingerprinting is using the .pub file when available. An other idea is to add a new option, I

I've expressed several concerns with enabling UpdateHostKeys by default, none of which were even commented on, so this topic seems to not be in any way open for discussion, but I'll still add one more thing here. Peter Stuge wrote: > Subject: Re: UpdateHostkeys now enabled by default > Date: Mon, 5 Oct 2020 11:22:29 +0000 .. > I do not disagree with progressive key management, we

Hi, We just imported (moved) all our staff from the old w2k domain to the new w2k3 domain. Say their accounts and passwords From STAFF domain to say NEW. Seems winbind is keeping the old domain users. I'm using winbind for squid auth on Mandrake linux 10.0 samba-client-3.0.10-0.1.100mdk samba-winbind-3.0.10-0.1.100mdk samba-doc-3.0.10-0.1.100mdk samba-common-3.0.10-0.1.100mdk

Hello Samba list! I have installed samba, joined it to the AD domain (lets say EXAMPLE.COM) and can auth against it with kinit. There are also 2 domains that we have a trust established with. Lets say trust1 and trust2. When I do a wbinfo -u I get: Trust1+username Trust2+username I get nothing from the local domain. I have a share set up for testing, but I cannot access it at all, I get

Hello Steve, Hello OpenSSH-portable developers, I am building OpenSSH for our (EBCDIC-based) BS2000 mainframe operating system, and I noticed you do the same for OS/390. Because my initial ssh port was based on IBM's OSS port (ssh-1.2.2 or some such), I thought it was fair enough to help with a little co-operation; we might come up with a unified EBCDIC patch which could be contributed to