similar to: Clean way to monitor status of 'sshd' remotely?

I'm having the same issue "Eddy Geez" posted about in October, 2001 - I'm looking to figure out how to politely disconnect from openssh's sshd, such that it will either not log the connection at all or will at least not log it at fatal level. I monitor the sshd daemon on all my hosts with Netsaint's check_ssh plugin every five minutes, so there are a *lot* of these log

https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2190 Bug ID: 2190 Summary: Nagios command check_ssh Product: Portable OpenSSH Version: 6.2p1 Hardware: ix86 OS: FreeBSD Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 Component: sshd Assignee: unassigned-bugs at mindrot.org

Folks, Does any of you have a sensible way of monitoring tinc? I haven?t tried anything yet, sorry for that. I?d like to avoid log spamming like the check_ssh plugin does (?10+ preauth' warnings a day). check_tcp is an option, but I was wondering whether anyone cooked up something more sensible. Met vriendelijke groet, Nick Hibma -- AnyWi Technologies BV E: nick at anywi.com T: +31 (0)71

hi Just installed astping in Nagios (former netsaint), and it works fine - for some time. After several hours, the Asterisk manager module just stopped responding, and I had to restart to make it work Any idea what might cause this? Sorry - I don't have the log now. Is it possible to have asterisk log console output somewhere? roy -- Roy Sigurd Karlsbakk, Datavaktmester ProntoTV AS -

Can Samba write to named pipes ? I am using Netsaint/Nagios for system monitoring and the command file to write system commands to is implemented as a named pipe. I can write normal files to the directory but whenever I try and write to the pipe I get access denied. Thanks. ---------------------------- Jeff White Senior Systems Engineer Xelus, Inc. Phone: 716-419-3105 Fax: 716-248-9199

Does anyone know if it's even possible to NOT cc myself when I hit reply all? Geez, that's what's in the sent folder.... mark

Hey guys, I sent an email to the list at 2:57PM central. I just now see it on the list, and its 3:23PM. Anyone else experience this? I am sending this email at 3:24PM central. Lets see when it gets posted to the list. -Matthew

https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2717 Bug ID: 2717 Summary: MonitoringHosts option - suppress Connection reset entries from known hosts Product: Portable OpenSSH Version: 7.5p1 Hardware: Other OS: Linux Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P5

incoming-centos at rjl.com wrote: > On 04/27/2018 07:55 AM, m.roth at 5-cent.us wrote: >> Does anyone know if it's even possible to NOT cc myself when I hit reply >> all? >> >> Geez, that's what's in the sent folder.... > > Check your settings for account setting->copies & folders->cc these > email addresses > > When I do a

What is wrong with you guys? I asked for a zip, like R Studio has for example. Totally clear. I cant execute exes. But I can unzip files. Thanks Gabor, I had that in mind, but can't execute the exe due to security restrictions. Geez, really, treating people who ask questions this way just makes you don't want to ask a single one. On Thu, Jan 25, 2018, 11:19 Gabor Grothendieck

I, too, want to thank Tom for such a great software package and all the support he has always given. I was just reading a Slashdot interview with the Nagios/NetSaint author Ethan Galstad. The whole article is interesting and I bet the questions and answers would be similar for Shorewall: http://interviews.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=03/01/09/1216259&mode=thread&tid=156 Question 19

An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.digium.com/pipermail/asterisk-users/attachments/20040107/0282906f/attachment.htm -------------- next part -------------- Hello Is there any way to limit amount of disk space available per user for the voicemail. Regards Tony

telnet 207.153.49.131 25 Trying 207.153.49.131... Connected to 207.153.49.131. Escape character is '^]'. 220 mail.caisnet.com FirstClass ESMTP Mail Server v6.0 ready That's one STUPID MTA.. STUPID MTA!!!! STUPID STUPID STUPID MTA~!!!!!!!! (ahem) Sorry.. Can someone block mailer-daemon@* from posting? Mike -- <mystica@darktech.org> --- >8 ---- List archives:

Application 1 is an auditing application called AuditSystem. Application 2 is a quality control appllication called QC. App1 has a couple of classes, including models, that i would like to use with App2. I would like a change in a class to be felt in both applications. How do i acheive this without copying and pasting code?? At the moment im feeling i should have made the whole thing one

At the risk of stating the obvious but 2.2.3a is rather old - try updating to the latest stable 2.2.x series of Samba. After that you might want to look into the options relating to "Oplocks" >>I am wondering if anybody has expected the same problem before? The only idea i have is that this error occures because i have a lot of file and directory, chown, chmod directives in my

I've done a little searching of the mailing lists before posting this and found a few threads on converting from mp3 to ogg but no one that I've seen ever answers the question. a .wav file is a digital format is it not? I'm no video/audio guru by any stretch so if I'm wrong on that point please correct me. But for this message I'm going to assume .wav is a digital format. .mp3

My model is very simple, it''s mostly just a join table that represents which tournaments a user has registered for. class Registration < ActiveRecord::Base belongs_to :user belongs_to :tournament validates_presence_of :user_id, :tournament_id validates_uniqueness_of :user_id, :scope => :tournament_id end the validates_uniqueness checks to make sure there''s no

When a caller calls my google voice phone number, I must answer, wait and press one to accept. Sometimes even that does not work. I have tried a few different things to get asterisk to place the call in an answered state and send the DTMF 1 with the Dial macro. I found Malcom Davenports wiki page regarding Google calling which has been very helpful in troubleshooting the issue.

Just curious if we're likely to see Firefox 1.04 coming out shortly!? 1.03 has some *nasty* vulnerabilities.... and it would be nice to get a new build of 1.04. yeah yeah... I know... wait for the upstream *rant* Geez.... they are dragging there feet on this one. :-(

On Mon, 17 Dec 2001 16:42:16 -0500 xiphmont@xiph.org (Monty) wrote: > OK, the original idiot is kicked. Geez, I try to get a few hours of > sleep and all Hell breaks loose. I don't think it was an idiot, just someone who left his computer for the weekend and hasnt come back to check it. (An educated guess, to say the least) > Hmmm.... OK, that's a pretty good kill pattern.