similar to: OpenSSH port to NetWare 6

I have attached a diff file with the changes to existing OpenSSH source files to accomodate the NetWare platform. All changes are #ifdef wrapped using one in one of the following defines: HAVE_NETWARE - Building for NetWare USE_EDIR - Using eDirectory(TM) for authentication. NICI - Using Novell International Cryptography Infrastructure (NICI) I have successfully built the OpenSSH-3.5p1

Hi, I have to implement SFTP using a Java program. I am looking for a package that implements a SFTP Client(preferably with sample code on usage). I need this in order to do SFTP file upload from my Java program. Any help would be appreciated. Thanks in advance. Regards, Preetha.

I have attached the diff file with the changes to existing OpenSSH source files to accomodate the NetWare platform. All changes are #ifdef wrapped using one in one of the following defines: HAVE_NETWARE - Building for NetWare USE_EDIR - Using eDirectory(TM) for authentication. NICI - Using Novell International Cryptography Infrastructure (NICI) I have successfully built the OpenSSH-3.5p1

I recently completed porting OpenSSH 3.5p1 for inclusion in the next major release of NetWare. When refering to the OpenSSH product in documentation and during installation, Novell would like to use the name "OpenSSH on NetWare". I could not find any reference on www.openssh.com concerning the use of the OpenSSH name when included with base OS installations. I am looking to see if

Hi all. I'd like to put together a small repo for Centos packages that I build on my machine, and make them available for other Centos users. Are there any guidlines for creating an officially endorsed Centos 3rd party repo please? Kind Regards, Keith Roberts ----------------------------------------------------------------- Websites: http://www.karsites.net http://www.php-debuggers.net

Probably this has come up before... but have we considered just adopting the Google style guidlines and maybe modifying it in some places? They have a nice script for c++ which will check for many things. http://google-styleguide.googlecode.com/svn/trunk/cppguide.xml http://google-styleguide.googlecode.com/svn/trunk/cpplint/cpplint.py

I note with interest that Kerberos support is now available (for the version 1 protocol, at least) in OpenSSH 2.9.9p2. However, it does not build with MIT Kerberos, due to the usual Heimdal/MIT library differences. These look, by and large, like the same problems I encountered when porting Dan Kouril's patch to MIT Kerberos - so I'm having a go at fixing them (my GSSAPI patches need

Reid, >Well, if it doesn't break anything else, I'd fix the header file. The >standard type name is supposed to uint64_t not u_int64_t. I would just >change the header file to define both of them, something like: > >typedef u_int64_t uint64_t; > >You could do that in /usr/include/types.h, I've tried it and it doesn't break anything, but ... >or we could

Next week are going to start using rsync "live" to mirror our primary and secondary web servers. I am still trying to iron out a couple of bugs, any help would be much apprecitated. Here is my rsync.conf file on my primary web server ############################ use chroot = no max connections = 5 syslog facility = local3 [www] path = /www comment = Web Directory hosts

Reid, When configuring LLVM I get this error: ----------------- checking for uint64_t... no configure: error: Type uint64_t required but not found ----------------- However, this type exists as u_int64_t in /usr/include/types.h. The easy way for me is to edit types.h, but I think the right thing is to somehow to test for it on Interix platform. Any thoughts? /Henrik --- Got Freedom?

Hey folks, Here at USC we have a few changes we make to the source code for various reasons -- and we have to make them for each new version. I always shrugged off sending a patch in because the changes felt very internal, but the more I think about it, the more I think perhaps they would be good for the main tree. Additionally, the more of this that gets into the main tree the easier upgrades

Hi Don, On 25 September 2017 at 22:29, Don Hinton <hintonda at gmail.com> wrote: > Thanks for reporting this. > > Looks like this one was missed -- the declaration should have been #ifdef'd > away along with the definition. A quick grep indicates there are a number > of them that need to be fixed. > > Here's the original commit: > > commit

Does anyone know of any Linux-based filesystem that does file-level auditing and logs based on username? Does ext2/3 do such auditing (stock or with patches)? I would like a filesystem that can be told to audit and log file deletions and log the username that deleted the file (similar to auditing on NTFS). I know, I should be using file permissions to prevent this type of deletion from

I subscribed this morning but have no traffic. Sometimes no traffic is a good thing. Since I've gone to ext3 on my 2.4.5 kernel, the only time I ever had problems was when the filesystems were not unmounted cleanly and the journal was lost. About 60 minutes of searching and reading and I found out how to recreate the journal. So far, so pleased with ext3fs. --

Hello all, The long-mooted PAM merge from FreeBSD is starting _now_. This replaces the PAM password auth kludge that we have used until now with a discrete challenge-response module. This module is invoked via keyboard-interactive for protocol 2 or TIS auth for protocol 1. Warning: this is a large change and will probably break things. It has only been tested with basic password auth modules and

Ok thanks, I thought there was a more direct way to do it... 2012/11/19 Eric Christopher <echristo at gmail.com> > llvm-extract and then llc? > > -eric > > > On Mon, Nov 19, 2012 at 10:25 AM, Christophe Duvernois < > christophe.duvernois at gmail.com> wrote: > >> Hi >> >> I use llvm-3.1. I have a large module and i want to emit native code

On Mon, Jun 4, 2012 at 2:29 PM, reed kotler <rkotler at mips.com> wrote: > Probably this has come up before... but have we considered just adopting > the Google style guidlines and maybe modifying it in some places? > Despite working at Google, and having to cope with multiple different styles in my day-to-day work as a consequence, I would not push for this. I think that we

> On Dec 10, 2014, at 4:22 PM, Eric Christopher <echristo at gmail.com> wrote: > > > > On Wed Dec 10 2014 at 3:57:25 PM Chris Bieneman <beanz at apple.com <mailto:beanz at apple.com>> wrote: > llvm-dev, > > In my ongoing saga to improve LLVM for embedded use, we would like to support stripping out unused intrinsics based on the LLVM targets actually

At 07:43 AM 6/29/2015, you wrote: >James B. Byrne wrote: > > On Mon, June 29, 2015 02:14, Sorin Srbu wrote: > > OS 6? > >> > >> Please note: I'm not criticizing, just curious about the argument > >> behind using a regular OS to do firewall-stuff. > > > > Maintenance. > > > > A consistent set of expectations does wonders for

Well, if it doesn't break anything else, I'd fix the header file. The standard type name is supposed to uint64_t not u_int64_t. I would just change the header file to define both of them, something like: typedef u_int64_t uint64_t; You could do that in /usr/include/types.h, or we could add it to a header file in llvm/include/Config, ifdef'd for Interix. Reid. On Tue, 2004-08-31 at