similar to: Bug when flushing data in openssh 2.9

When connecting with v1, the server logs a message when I exit my login shell: Closing connection to 130.207.167.32 However, when connecting with v2, it only ever logs: Connection closed by remote host. Tracing through the code, it appears that instead of breaking in serverloop.c:server_loop2() at: if (had_channel && !channel_still_open()) {

hello.. i am running openssh-3.7.1p2. on linux.It is working successfully..and daemon is running &client also connecting.But the problem is with the mips architecture when i connecting this server from remote syytem.?i got an error of buufer_get:trying to get more bytes 1 than buffer0.And client is not connecting from remote system.My out is as follows on my server ?in sshd main before

hello.. i am running openssh-3.7.1p2. on linux.It is working successfully.and daemon is running &client also connecting.But the problem is with the mips architecture when i connecting this server from remote syytem. i got an error of buufer_get:trying to get more bytes 1 than buffer0.And client is not connecting from remote system.My out is as follows on my server in sshd main before

Hi all, This is a client side only implementation of reversed dynamic (SOCKS) TCP forwarding, which means it is compatible with any existing servers have 'remote forward' capability. To establish such forward, use "ssh -R [BIND_ADDRESS:]PORT ...". The server will listen on that port and address and accept SOCKS traffics. Hope this will be useful for you. There was an

-- | "Bombay is 250ms from New York in the new world order" - Alan Cox | Damien Miller - http://www.mindrot.org/ | Email: djm at mindrot.org (home) -or- djm at ibs.com.au (work) ---------- Forwarded message ---------- Date: Tue, 25 Apr 2000 19:55:56 -0600 (MDT) From: Theo de Raadt <deraadt at cvs.openbsd.org> To: djm at cvs.openbsd.org, markus at cvs.openbsd.org, provos at

I love SSH's ability to dynamically forward ports using SOCKS (either -D or DynamicForward) (ie "ssh -D 1081 private.mine.net"). But the thing that has caused me some pain, is that only SOCKS4 is supported. The SOCKS4 proxy specification does not permit hostnames, but only IP addresses. This isn't much of a problem if the target host is a public Internet host or otherwise DNS

This provides SOCKS4A support, which allows a SOCKS4 client to provide a host name instead of an IP address. It indicates that it's doing so by using a known-invalid IP address 0.0.0.x (where x != 0), and then appending the NUL-terminated hostname to the connection request. Although we check for the terminating NUL manually and the 'fatal(len %d > have %d)' should never happen, the

Hi, I am facing an issue with openssh-4.5p1. I am not sure whether its an openssh issue or a tcp stack issue since I am using a simulated tcp/ip stack. While copying a file of around 1GB using sftp/scp I am getting a send:Message too long error. I did a bit of debugging and found that ssh code was sending packet of size greater than 131072 bytes from the application level to the socket and

here's an up-to-date patch, should apply to both openbsd and non-openbsd versions of openssh. i did only test ipv4 addresses. Index: channels.c =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/src/usr.bin/ssh/channels.c,v retrieving revision 1.191 diff -u -r1.191 channels.c --- channels.c 24 Jun 2003 08:23:46 -0000 1.191 +++ channels.c 25 Jun 2003 12:14:19

this (uncomplete) patch makes various features compile time options and saves up to 24K in the resulting ssh/sshd binaries. i don't know whether this should be added to the CVS since it makes the code less readable. perhaps WITH_COMPRESSION should be added, since it removes the dependency on libz -m Index: Makefile.inc =================================================================== RCS

Andrew and I thought it might be an interesting experiment to move rsync to using BitKeeper rather than CVS for source code control. For a project with rsync's size and activity CVS is actually fine, but it would be a nice "toe in the water" with BitKeeper to get some practical experience before possibly using it on larger projects. BK is moderately well-proven on open source

Hi, I''m currently writing a Rails app, in a repository controlled by BitKeeper. BitKeeper creates files, in the sub-directories it controls, so for source file yyy.zzz in Directory XXX it saves a file called s.yyy.zzz in subdirectory XXX/SCCS. When these files are created in config/initializers, rails tries to load them when it is run (as they retain the .rb extension). So my question

The BitKeeper repository has been taken down, and all the code moved into CVS. While BitKeeper is a superior source management tool to CVS in many ways, it lacks in one important way, Freedom. With the recent change to their license, taking away more of our freedoms, I felt it was time to go back to CVS. All the code has been imported into the xiph.org CVS repository. I'll try to revise

The BitKeeper repository has been taken down, and all the code moved into CVS. While BitKeeper is a superior source management tool to CVS in many ways, it lacks in one important way, Freedom. With the recent change to their license, taking away more of our freedoms, I felt it was time to go back to CVS. All the code has been imported into the xiph.org CVS repository. I'll try to revise

On Nov 28, 2006, at 11:06 AM, Bill Wendling wrote: > (Has anyone > mentioned Bitkeeper yet? :-) I'm not certain if this was a serious suggestion. Probably not. I'll actually comment on this one because we actually do use BitKeeper in my research group. It's a great tool, but it is not free anymore for open-source projects. Branching and merging is a breeze in

Hello Steve, Hello OpenSSH-portable developers, I am building OpenSSH for our (EBCDIC-based) BS2000 mainframe operating system, and I noticed you do the same for OS/390. Because my initial ssh port was based on IBM's OSS port (ssh-1.2.2 or some such), I thought it was fair enough to help with a little co-operation; we might come up with a unified EBCDIC patch which could be contributed to

Perhaps someone could come up with a list of different versioning software, list the pros and cons, and then we could vote? (Has anyone mentioned Bitkeeper yet? :-) -bw On 11/28/06, Rafael Espíndola <rafael.espindola at gmail.com> wrote: > > I'm not sure if I just took HEAD or converted the whole llvm repo. > > Personally, I like darcs for the atomic theory of patches.

Hello, In response to the timing analysis attacks presented by Dawn Song et. al. in her paper http://paris.cs.berkeley.edu/~dawnsong/ssh-timing.html we at Silicon Defense developed a patch for openssh to avoid such measures. Timing Analysis Evasion changes were developed by C. Jason Coit and Roel Jonkman of Silicon Defense. These changes cause SSH to send packets unless request not to,

> On Mon, 6 Aug 2001, Jack Moffitt wrote: > It works, but hasn't been released. I will be making nightly snapshots > available of the repositories in the next day or so, and that should > help get more people testing it. So far it's help up quite well, and > the tools are _nice_ courtesy of Oddsock and Vakor :) Can you provide any more info on this? Are the snapshots up

The following patch adds ocfs support to blkid. --rusty # This is a BitKeeper generated patch for the following project: # Project Name: Ext2 filesystem utilities # This patch format is intended for GNU patch command version 2.5 or higher. # This patch includes the following deltas: # ChangeSet 1.1327 -> 1.1328 # lib/blkid/probe.c 1.15 -> 1.16 #