similar to: Intermittent port forwarding problems openssh 2.9.2p and up

Hi, I have configured ssh for port forwarding local 8080 to out company web proxy server. # ssh -L 8080:proxy:8080 myname at ssh-host I've tried the configuration by using # telnet localhost 8080 and it works fine. But whenever I try to use it with any http browser, it just fails. I investigated the problem with Ethereal and I've noticed that packets travel on loopback interface,

Thanks for the answers. > See http://llvm.org/docs/FAQ.html#platformindependent . If you're > dealing with C code, it isn't too hard to add a new target to clang; > send an email to cfe-dev if you need help with that. The "target > datalayout" information is purely a hint to the optimizers. My experience this far has been mainly with using llvm-gcc and llvmc,

I'm do looking for the features the isysroot gives. I have "/myownheaders/usr/include" and "/myownheaders/usr/local/include" folders (they contain the actual header files). Again, the strange that gcc seem to be working with it. In the mean time I've found this (http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/pipermail/llvmbugs/2011-December/021136.html), isn't it related? > From:

> OpenSSH_3.4p1, SSH protocols 1.5/2.0, OpenSSL 0x0090607f > AIX 4.3.3.0 Maintenance Level 10. > > I have run a test on my boxes and found the following: > > > scp test <remote_machine>:~/test > test 100% |*****************************| 16000 > 00:00 > > > > scp works fine, but when I tried to redirect stdio/stderr to files they >

Hello, I am not sure if this is a bug or a feature... When I use scp to copy a file to a filesystem which forces or masks permissions on new files (in my case a samba share) the resulting permissions depend on whether the owner had write access in the original permissions. If the owner did have write access then the copied file ends up with the permissions specified by the filesystem. If the

We recently tried upgrading openssh from 2.5.2p2 to 2.9p1 and discovered that it no longer worked to feed the output from a remote command into a pipe, unless the output was short and the pipe was very fast at processing its input. Example 1: ssh remote_machine some_command | less (where "some_command" generates a lot of output) now fails after the first screenful, with a

If the point is to access a specific web site only the remote machine can get to, you can also do it with port forwarding: ssh -L 8000:ip_of_web_site_to_access_from_remote:443 remote_machine and then locally run any browser, and access https://localhost:443 (assuming it's https. If it's plain http, use "http" and 80). Note that you'll be breaking some aspects of https

Hello all This patch tries to remove a few bugs from smbmount. It would be nice to get some testing+feedback on this from others using smbmount and possibly get these things fixed for the next release of samba. It does the following: * Change lib/debug.c to allow changing your mind on being interactive. A second call to setup_logging should now replace the effects of a previous call. (hmm,

Hello , In my new project we start to use the following commands : ssh , scp and sftp . Server: hp-ux Environment : ksh Ssh version : 2 I have a few question about the ssh definition : 1. Description: When we connect to user via script ( batch mode ) by using the command "ssh -l remote_user remote_host" - this session is stuck ( wait input from user - password).

On Thu, Nov 12, 2020 at 12:56:15PM +0000, Bernstein, Noam CIV USN NRL (6393) Washington DC (USA) via CentOS wrote: > > If the point is to access a specific web site only the remote > machine can get to, you can also do it with port forwarding: > ssh -L 8000:ip_of_web_site_to_access_from_remote:443 remote_machine > and then locally run any browser, and access >

On 2018-09-12 09:44 AM, Jeremy Allison via samba wrote: > On Wed, Sep 12, 2018 at 09:30:19AM -0700, Ray Klassen via samba wrote: >> >> and from the what the hell department. I did it. Comparing >> >> https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/windows/desktop/api/lmshare/ns-lmshare-_session_info_1 >> >> >> and >> >>

Hi We are running Samba on an IBM zSeries mainframe on Linux kernel 2.2.16 and are running into problems when using winbindd and security=domain. We are doing a proof of concept using opensource and I really hope we can pull it off! Before I raise a bug report, I would appreciate it if someone can tell me if this is a known problem. I have not found anything on it yet. We have winbindd set up

hi*& Samba has troubles with joining to NT PDC, that has some scope id because: 1. smbpasswd does not know anything about scope id and you haven't any chance to join into NT PDC. 2. also many utils like smbmount doesn't know scope id 3. In smbclient you can specify scope id, but you should remember it and etc. It's not so usable. I'm asked about these problems in samba

I believe I have encountered a nasty bug with rsync 2.6.6 "--delete-excluded" option. When this is enabled, rsync''s operation appears to break entirely. I have a script that I''ve been using for a few years. The script hasn''t changed in the last year or so. Recently I upgraded from SuSE 9.3 to SUSE 10.0 which means that I went from rsync 2.6.3 (+ patches,

Hi, I'm having problems with the command= syntax in the authorized_keys file. I'm running rsync 2.5.6. I've searched the list archives for "authorized_keys" and "protocol version mismatch", but I can't seem to derive a solution from those threads. Simply put, my goal is to let a group of 15 to 20 users update a set of files in a single user account on a

On 11/12/20 7:50 AM, Jonathan Billings wrote: > On Thu, Nov 12, 2020 at 12:56:15PM +0000, Bernstein, Noam CIV USN NRL (6393) Washington DC (USA) via CentOS wrote: >> If the point is to access a specific web site only the remote >> machine can get to, you can also do it with port forwarding: >> ssh -L 8000:ip_of_web_site_to_access_from_remote:443 remote_machine >> and

(There really doesn't seem to be a dedicated e2fsprogs list, so this was the next-best place I could find. I don't place much faith in the sourceforge forums..) The filesystem in question is a 480 gig ext3 partition, on a hardware RAID5 controller. It's approximately 90% full, with something like 115K files. Kernel 2.4.20-pre4, on a Duron 900. As I type this, e2fsck has used up

Hello > In doing this, I'm essentially overriding any "target triple" existing in > the IR, breaking up the process into a multi-stage operation (llvm-gcc, opt > and llc running independently) and picking whatever target I want, right? No. This won't work since, as indicated in the FAQ entry IR derived from C/C++ is not target neutral, so you cannot 'just'

Over the past few days I''ve seen a number of examples posted here where people are populating their select boxes in the view; that is: <% options = Model.find(:all, ...).map{|m| [m.name, m.id]} -%> <%= select(:object, :attribute, options, ... %> Is this the preferred way of doing this? I''ve generally done this in my controller, where I can catch exceptions and

shouldn't the malloc() be something like malloc(sizeof(int)*size)? You're allocating 5 bytes, which is probably not the size of an int in llvm (it's definitely not the size of an int in sparc), and later you're trying to access c[1], which starts at byte 4 but is out of bounds. On Fri, 1 Nov 2002, Xiaodong Li wrote: > Dear LLVM: > > I wrote a small testcase and I can