similar to: Bad packet length error

Hi All, So I tried to upgrade to 2.5.2p2 today. Got this when I stopped/started sshd: Disabling protocol version 2. Could not load host key Re-installed 2.3.0p1 and all was well again. This look familiar to anybody? Thanks, Jim -- Jim Seymour | PGP Public Key available at: jseymour at jimsun.LinxNet.com | http://www.uk.pgp.net/pgpnet/pks-commands.html

I'm using rsync on an embedded powerpc platform with flash filesystem. Because of a power-cycle a local file got corrupted. This file is /flashfs/isd1, it has the correct size but wrong MD5SUM (cd5...). Using rsync to retrieve the right file (from a remote machine) fails! If I delete the file first, it works (see below). How is this possible ? --- N. van Bolhuis. # md5sum /flashfs/isd1

Hi There, Tried a Samba AD. Didn't work out. Please do not suggest. Thanks! Here's what we have: Ubuntu Linux 14.04.4 LTS Samba 4.3.9-Ubuntu Using OpenLDAP for authentication Using nscd to speed things up *Not* running winbind *Not* running Kerberos The problem is the company purchased a product that, *despite* the vendor being told "We don't have

Hi There, We have this rather large-ish floor-standing Best Axxium Pro, Model Series 0650. I tried using both the "bestups" and "blazer_ser" drivers with it, but no go. So before I go any further: *Should* one of these work with it and, if not, do I have any options? (E.g.: Modify a current driver, resuscitate one that was started and abandoned, etc.? I can code.) My test

Hi, I just did a cvs update on my copy of the openssh stuff here to be sure that this bug is still existing. If I connect to a host running 2.3.0p1 and use protocol version 2 ssh fails. Here's the excerpt from the debug log. I would appreciate if someone could fix this, so that I can use protocol version 2 again: |debug1: GOT SSH2_MSG_NEWKEYS. |debug1: send SSH2_MSG_NEWKEYS. |debug1: done:

Hi, Connecting from RHL7 with OpenSSH 2.3.0p1 or 2.5.0p1 to OpenSSH 2.3.0p1 on AIX 4.3.1. Protocol 2 doesn't work if you specify 'Ciphers rijndael128-cbc' or Ciphers 'aes128-cbc'. sshd -d -d -d on the server shows _nothing_ about these connections. I'm not sure if rijndael has been left out from sshd somehow, but shouldn't the error message be a little more

On Thu, 27 Aug 2015 23:03:39 -0400 Robert Moskowitz <rgm at htt-consult.com> wrote: > > On 08/27/2015 08:45 PM, Jim Seymour wrote: > > On Thu, 27 Aug 2015 17:00:28 -0400 > > Robert Moskowitz <rgm at htt-consult.com> wrote: > > > >> Ah, LDAP is included within Samba, I find. Don't install provided > >> one... [snip] > > >

Hi, The following discussion was posted to comp.security.ssh however, it seems that my problems may be a bug in SSH. Could someone please indicate whether there is a bug fix, or perhaps whether I should go back a version or so. In summary: - Win98 machine (client) - OpenSSH as packaged with Cygwin tools 1.1.8 (openssh-2.5.2p2-3) - Connecting to a Sun running Solaris. ssh: SSH Secure Shell

I am trying to resolve an issue with SSH2 version 2.5.2p2 on Solaris 2.6. SSH2, SSH1 and SCP all work fine in and out. The problem is with SFTP. I can SFTP out, but not in. I can't SFTP into itself. After I issue the command, I get a password prompt. After I give the password, the connection closes with an Exit Status 127. There are 3 other system configure the same and everything is

Hi All, Well, after going in something of the Wrong Direction, I figure on starting over. Now: Looking at the docs, ISTM that BIND_DLZ is kind of a PITA. So, being as I need the BIND (server also is the nameserver for the entire LAN), and the recommendation is to put the AD PDC in a sub-domain, anyway, I was thinking: Run BIND as normal, but bind it to only eth0 Set up an eth0:0

http://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=88 ------- Additional Comments From markus at openbsd.org 2002-01-31 23:01 ------- this is an installation error on the target host, see: scp: warning: Executing scp1 compatibility. scp: FATAL: Executing ssh1 in compatibility mode failed (Check that scp1 is in your PATH). ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee

On 08/27/2015 04:18 PM, Marc Muehlfeld wrote: > Hello Jim, > > Am 27.08.2015 um 21:49 schrieb Jim Seymour: >> BIND would be the auth nameserver for example.com and delegate >> the samdom.example.com zone to the Samba DNS running on the second >> (virtual) interface >> >> Samba is the auth nameserver for samdom.example.com > If

NOTE: Please honour the "Reply-To" and do not "Reply-All". I'm reading the mailing list. I wouldn't be posting to it if I was not and I don't need two copies. Thanks! On Tue, 8 Sep 2015 10:32:33 -0400 Robert Moskowitz <rgm at htt-consult.com> wrote: > [snip] > > Oops. I missed that you had missed this! When you said flat zone > file, I took

On Tue, 26 Jul 2016 16:09:10 +0100 Rowland penny <rpenny at samba.org> wrote: > On 26/07/16 15:31, Jim Seymour wrote: > > Hi There, > > > > Tried a Samba AD. Didn't work out. Please do not suggest. > > Thanks! > > Why didn't Samba AD work, what problems did you have, it might be > easier to fix them. It's a long and ugly story, which

On Tue, 26 Jul 2016 17:40:47 +0100 Rowland penny <rpenny at samba.org> wrote: [snip] > > I remember it now, it started last September ( see here: > https://lists.samba.org/archive/samba/2015-September/194047.html) and > it could have been the longest running thread on here and you still > couldn't get it to work. More accurately: Couldn't get it to work the way

OpenSSH-2.5.2.p1 won't connect to OpenSSH-2.5.1p2 using version 2 protocol, quitting with the error message: [dunlap at tesla dunlap]$ ssh -2 kraken 7a 90 3f 39 37 67 0d 9e ac 43 74 c3 83 83 f5 a2 Disconnecting: Bad packet length 2056273721. tesla is Linux tesla.apl.washington.edu 2.2.16-3 #1 Mon Jun 19 19:11:44 EDT 2000 i686 unknown Intel RHL6.2 with OpenSSH-2.5.2.p1 compiled from sources

On Tue, 8 Sep 2015 09:19:22 -0400 Robert Moskowitz <rgm at htt-consult.com> wrote: > > On 09/08/2015 09:04 AM, Jim Seymour wrote: > [snip] > > > > And the zone file on deepthought might read something like... > > > > somepc IN A 192.168.0.10 [snip] > > Problem with the AD DC is that it lives in a sub-domain, > >

Hi All, Finally got BIND_DLZ going. Last errors were: samba_dlz: Failed to configure zone 'example.com' loading configuration: already exists exiting (due to fatal error) samba_dlz: shutting down And, indeed, I had, in /etc/bind/named.local.conf: zone "example.com" in { type master; file "named.hosts"; }; Commenting that out

On 7/27/2016 12:18 PM, Jim Seymour wrote: > On Tue, 26 Jul 2016 13:40:59 -0500 > Dale Schroeder <dale at BriannasSaladDressing.com> wrote: > > [snip] >> Sorry Rowland, but the break happened before the badlock patches when >> Debian jumped from 4.1.x to 4.3.x, skipping 4.2.x altogether. > [snip] >> Jim, currently at Debian 4.4.5. If you search this list, you

On 08/27/2015 04:52 PM, Rowland Penny wrote: > On 27/08/15 21:42, Robert Moskowitz wrote: >> >> >> On 08/27/2015 04:37 PM, Rowland Penny wrote: >>> On 27/08/15 21:23, Robert Moskowitz wrote: >>>> >>>> >>>> On 08/27/2015 04:18 PM, Marc Muehlfeld wrote: >>>>> Hello Jim, >>>>> >>>>> Am