similar to: Could not load host key

Hello, I just built openssh-2.5.2p2 on an HP running HP-UX 11.00. Seems now when I try and connect to other HP's running ssh with version openssh-2.3.0p1 (using protocol version 2), I'm getting disconnected because of a "Bad packet length" error: ssh -v isd1 ... debug1: ssh_dss_verify: signature correct debug1: Wait SSH2_MSG_NEWKEYS. debug1: GOT SSH2_MSG_NEWKEYS. debug1: send

Tom Eastep \ Shorewall - iptables made easy Shoreline, \ http://shorewall.net Washington USA \ teastep@shorewall.net ---------- Forwarded message ---------- Date: Tue, 26 Aug 2003 22:45:49 -0400 (EDT) From: Jim Seymour <jseymour@LinxNet.com> Reply-To: postfix-users@postfix.org To: postfix-users@postfix.org Subject: Re: Stop Using relays.osirusoft.com *NOW*! jseymour@LinxNet.com

Hi There, We have this rather large-ish floor-standing Best Axxium Pro, Model Series 0650. I tried using both the "bestups" and "blazer_ser" drivers with it, but no go. So before I go any further: *Should* one of these work with it and, if not, do I have any options? (E.g.: Modify a current driver, resuscitate one that was started and abandoned, etc.? I can code.) My test

NOTE: Please honour the "Reply-To" and do not "Reply-All". I'm reading the mailing list. I wouldn't be posting to it if I was not and I don't need two copies. Thanks! On Tue, 8 Sep 2015 10:32:33 -0400 Robert Moskowitz <rgm at htt-consult.com> wrote: > [snip] > > Oops. I missed that you had missed this! When you said flat zone > file, I took

Hi There, Tried a Samba AD. Didn't work out. Please do not suggest. Thanks! Here's what we have: Ubuntu Linux 14.04.4 LTS Samba 4.3.9-Ubuntu Using OpenLDAP for authentication Using nscd to speed things up *Not* running winbind *Not* running Kerberos The problem is the company purchased a product that, *despite* the vendor being told "We don't have

On Tue, 26 Jul 2016 16:09:10 +0100 Rowland penny <rpenny at samba.org> wrote: > On 26/07/16 15:31, Jim Seymour wrote: > > Hi There, > > > > Tried a Samba AD. Didn't work out. Please do not suggest. > > Thanks! > > Why didn't Samba AD work, what problems did you have, it might be > easier to fix them. It's a long and ugly story, which

On Thu, 27 Aug 2015 23:03:39 -0400 Robert Moskowitz <rgm at htt-consult.com> wrote: > > On 08/27/2015 08:45 PM, Jim Seymour wrote: > > On Thu, 27 Aug 2015 17:00:28 -0400 > > Robert Moskowitz <rgm at htt-consult.com> wrote: > > > >> Ah, LDAP is included within Samba, I find. Don't install provided > >> one... [snip] > > >

On Thu, 3 Sep 2015 16:18:21 +0100 Rowland Penny <rowlandpenny241155 at gmail.com> wrote: > On 03/09/15 15:57, Jim Seymour wrote: > > On Thu, 3 Sep 2015 15:07:37 +0100 > > Rowland Penny <rowlandpenny241155 at gmail.com> wrote: > > > > [snip] > >> The kerberos default_realm must be the samba AD DC domain name and > >> usually > > So if

On Tue, 8 Sep 2015 09:19:22 -0400 Robert Moskowitz <rgm at htt-consult.com> wrote: > > On 09/08/2015 09:04 AM, Jim Seymour wrote: > [snip] > > > > And the zone file on deepthought might read something like... > > > > somepc IN A 192.168.0.10 [snip] > > Problem with the AD DC is that it lives in a sub-domain, > >

Hi All, I should have considered this beforehand... Assumed the info would be in the Wiki somewhere. Cannot find. The way our LAN has been working is clients use DHCP, but all address assignments are static. Thus, when a given PC asks "what's my address?", the DHCP server looks at the MAC address and asks the configured resolver what is the IP address for the hostname for that

On Tue, 26 Jul 2016 17:40:47 +0100 Rowland penny <rpenny at samba.org> wrote: [snip] > > I remember it now, it started last September ( see here: > https://lists.samba.org/archive/samba/2015-September/194047.html) and > it could have been the longest running thread on here and you still > couldn't get it to work. More accurately: Couldn't get it to work the way

Hi All, Finally got BIND_DLZ going. Last errors were: samba_dlz: Failed to configure zone 'example.com' loading configuration: already exists exiting (due to fatal error) samba_dlz: shutting down And, indeed, I had, in /etc/bind/named.local.conf: zone "example.com" in { type master; file "named.hosts"; }; Commenting that out

To Whom It May Concern, I tried emailing the ostensible mailing list owner, at both addresses noted, and got no response. Maybe somebody here knows how to alert whomever must know about this. Observe... From home (business class cable with static IP and valid rDNS)... $ host -t mx samba.org samba.org mail is handled by 10 smtp.samba.org. samba.org mail is handled by 5

Jim, It wasn't an implication that Samba4 would crash your server, rather it was a question of what happens *if* that box fails (power supply, memory, cpu, disk controller, etc. I've seen 'em all)? Consider this. I had one site with a Microsoft DC providing DHCP to it's clients and shared folders. When that DC failed due to disk controller, it stopped issuing DHCP leases.

On Thu, 3 Sep 2015 15:07:37 +0100 Rowland Penny <rowlandpenny241155 at gmail.com> wrote: [snip] > > The kerberos default_realm must be the samba AD DC domain name and > usually So if I put the Samba AD DC in, say, "addc.example.com," "addc.example.com" must be the Kerberos default_realm? > the samba DNS server (internal or bind) is just the dns >

Hi All, Well, after going in something of the Wrong Direction, I figure on starting over. Now: Looking at the docs, ISTM that BIND_DLZ is kind of a PITA. So, being as I need the BIND (server also is the nameserver for the entire LAN), and the recommendation is to put the AD PDC in a sub-domain, anyway, I was thinking: Run BIND as normal, but bind it to only eth0 Set up an eth0:0

I'm very confused. I have a Samba4 AD/DC which works great for Windows Authentication with our Windows 7 workstations. Now, I am trying to implement single-sign-on for our coming-soon Linux workstations. All web documentation I've so far found on this references OpenLDAP as the server and describes server-side commands such as kadmin and slapd-config to get things set up on the

On 08/27/2015 04:18 PM, Marc Muehlfeld wrote: > Hello Jim, > > Am 27.08.2015 um 21:49 schrieb Jim Seymour: >> BIND would be the auth nameserver for example.com and delegate >> the samdom.example.com zone to the Samba DNS running on the second >> (virtual) interface >> >> Samba is the auth nameserver for samdom.example.com > If

On 08/27/2015 04:52 PM, Rowland Penny wrote: > On 27/08/15 21:42, Robert Moskowitz wrote: >> >> >> On 08/27/2015 04:37 PM, Rowland Penny wrote: >>> On 27/08/15 21:23, Robert Moskowitz wrote: >>>> >>>> >>>> On 08/27/2015 04:18 PM, Marc Muehlfeld wrote: >>>>> Hello Jim, >>>>> >>>>> Am

On Tue, 26 Jul 2016 12:37:51 -0500 Dale Schroeder <dale at BriannasSaladDressing.com> wrote: [snip] > > Jim, > > This may be your problem: Samba 4.3.9 > > Upgrading my NT4 domain from 4.2.x to 4.3.x and beyond broke it, and > no combination of configuration parameters could put it back together > again. > > I wish you better luck. Yikes! Thanks for