similar to: doubt

Yup, You are right. That exploded. I missed some lines in between. there was a .reserve(total) in the actual code. But, there is some side effect I still could not find. 2007/8/16, Chris Lattner <sabre at nondot.org>: > > On Wed, 15 Aug 2007, [ISO-8859-1] Emílio Wuerges wrote: > > -- > > int total = BB->size(); > > std::vector<MachineInstr*>

For adding the nop: TII->insertNoop(*BB, BB->end()); 2007/8/9, Chris Lattner <sabre at nondot.org>: > > On Thu, 9 Aug 2007, [ISO-8859-1] Emílio Wuerges wrote: > > I too believe it should not be complicated. > > But I was not being able to do it. > > Finally, after some thinking (and tinkering), this worked like a charm: > > > > MachineInstr* mi =

Hi Tanya and everybody, Ty for your support. I too believe it should not be complicated. But I was not being able to do it. For instance, I tried to run this code below: BB->push_back(&(BB->front())); BB->pop_front(); But it did not work (kinda obvious why). Nor this: BB->push_back(BB->begin()); BB->pop_front(); But also did not work. It seams the same

Hi, just found a small typo in help(sample). In 'Arguments' section, where says n: a non-negaiive integer, the number of items to choose from. should be n: a non-negative integer, the number of items to choose from. I didn't filled a bug report because this is very trivial. Thanks, -- Fernando Mayer Programa de P?s-Gradua??o em Ecologia (PPGE) Universidade Federal de Santa

Hello guys, I plan to do some pre register allocation optimizations. I already know my way around LLVM but I could use some more experience. I need a way to reorder instructions inside MachineBasicBlocks or MachineFunctions. I've been searching for it but I have not found an example in the code yet. Can someone point me where I should look for? ty, -- Emilio Wuerges LAPS - Laboratorio

On Wed, 15 Aug 2007, [ISO-8859-1] Em�lio Wuerges wrote: > -- > int total = BB->size(); > std::vector<MachineInstr*> positionmap(total); > for (int i = 0; i< total; ++i) > positionmap.push_back(BB->remove(BB->begin())); > for(int i = 0; i< total; ++i) > BB->push_back(positionmap[i]); > -- This doesn't do what you think. This line:

I had instaled winrar3.51 and I get this errors: fixme:actctx:CreateActCtxW stub! err:rebar:REBAR_AdjustBands Phase 1 failed, x=692, maxx=-4, start=0, end=0 err:rebar:REBAR_AdjustBands Phase 1 failed, x=692, maxx=-4, start=0, end=0 err:rebar:REBAR_AdjustBands Phase 1 failed, x=40, maxx=-4, start=1, end=1 err:rebar:REBAR_AdjustBands Phase 1 failed, x=692, maxx=-4, start=0, end=0

I added a linux server to the Active Directory domain, I realized that the samba-winbind package uses the smb.conf file, but I also need to use the same linux server with shares, if I install the samba package, this package use the smb.conf file. Is there a solution? Then i have problem with 2 services. Example systemctl services: smb.service winbind.service My system is Centos 7. --

Dears, when i add a printer in Cups, on share samba, don't update printers, only i try to restart or reload service. Do you have any idea? -- <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<------------------------------------------------------------------->>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> < Disse-lhe Jesus: Eu

Hi All, I have a very simple problem. I have several files in a same directory. I would like to send for an object only the files that finish in ".sens.". I execute the command below, files <- dir(pattern="*.sens") but it includes all of the files that have "sens", independent of they be in the end or in the middle of the name of the file. How could I solve

Hi all, A week agoo I sent an email about reordering instruction in basicblocks. And ... I was able to do it. I guess so, at least. Now when compiling my test program, llc dumps: -- llc: /home/mentat/llvm_work/llvm/lib/CodeGen/LiveVariables.cpp:155: void llvm::LiveVariables::HandleVirtRegUse(llvm::LiveVariables::VarInfo&, llvm::MachineBasicBlock*, llvm::MachineInstr*): Assertion

Hi Luiz... I think you just misunderstood the concept of Samba... You can indeed you samba to make both task... Just join your samba box to AD and be happy. 2017-04-17 13:26 GMT-03:00 Luiz Guilherme Nunes Fernandes via samba < samba at lists.samba.org>: > Well, i need join 1 server Linux in Active Directory, i need too, create > one domain in samba for shared printers with cups.

Greetings from Brazil, 1) I installed winbind and everything seems good, but i have kde installed and i'm trying to run windowmaker.. if i choose 'failsafe' or log into the black terminal it runs ok.. but when i try to log into the windowmaker.. it does not log in... what should i do ? 2) how can i login with the local accounts (root and others) while winbind is running ? i can only

Hi, i have one doubt, is possible use only logs for use "printers" or "print$" shares? i need filter only logging users. Example: What user use this printer, How time? etc --

Well, i add new configuration in my smb.conf. I try connecting in shared backup, this work with authentication, in shared printers, It prints with anonymous users and when I insert one valid ad user, it prints and displays the following error: "Idle - "Session setup failed: NT_STATUS_LOGON_FAILURE" Another doubt, in directory /var/spool/samba/, no have files, This folder should not

On Mon, 17 Apr 2017 14:57:45 -0300 Luiz Guilherme Nunes Fernandes <narutospinal at gmail.com> wrote: > Well, i dont have sssd installed. OK, now we know that ;-) > > With winbind i install this packages: > yum install realmd oddjob oddjob-mkhomedir adcli samba-common > samba-common-tools krb5-workstation openldap-clients > policycoreutils-python samba-winbind-clients I

> I need a way to reorder instructions inside MachineBasicBlocks or > MachineFunctions. > I've been searching for it but I have not found an example in the code yet. For MachineBasicBlocks, check out this doc: http://llvm.org/doxygen/classllvm_1_1MachineBasicBlock.html I believe its basically the same as basic blocks in that you can manipulate the instruction list. Otherwise, you

On Thu, 9 Aug 2007, [ISO-8859-1] Em�lio Wuerges wrote: > I too believe it should not be complicated. > But I was not being able to do it. > Finally, after some thinking (and tinkering), this worked like a charm: > > MachineInstr* mi = BB->remove(BB->begin()); > BB->push_back(mi); > > But, is there a better way to do it? This is a good way to do a single

Anyone else interested in an AVR backend? If so, for what members of the AVR family? If we do a port, likely it'll support only the ATmegas. John

I have a client who might well make use of an AVR32 port, but I suspect that machine is very different than the one you are currently examining. shap On Mon, 2008-05-19 at 12:38 -0600, John Regehr wrote: > Anyone else interested in an AVR backend? > > If so, for what members of the AVR family? If we do a port, likely it'll > support only the ATmegas. > > John >