similar to: Suspicious shadow listen port

I've attached a patch to OpenSSH 3.0.2p1 that will allow the client side of local port forwarding to be bound to a single address. For my purposes, binding to 127.0.0.1 or (via GatewayPorts) all addresses would not work. I overloaded the "-b local_host" option so that it's address will be used when "-L port:remote_host:remote_port" is also specified. Today is the first

Heya.. By reading my /usr/local/etc/apache2/httpd.conf, I can find out that my Apache is running as the user "www" and the group "www" .. Yet, when I run sockstat, it tells me one of the forks are runned as root and listening on port 80 as well as the other forks are runned by www:www.. If I got a lot of users connecting to my server on port 80, will thier requests ever be

I have a samba server at ip address aaa.bbb.ccc.ddd I can connect to it from clients on subnets aaa.bbb.eee. and aaa.bbb.fff. I can't connect to it from clients on ggg.hhh. smb.conf has hosts deny = all hosts allow = localhost, aaa.bbb., ggg.hhh. The client can successfully 'ping mysambaserver' (resolves to aaa.bbb.ccc.ddd). Doing 'net view \\mysambaserver' fails with

Hi everybody. I was just wondering if this is a bug or I am simply doing something wrong. Here is what happened: (1) I typed windows() to get the graph menu bar (2) I turned record on history menu (3) I created a couple of plots (4) I checked with PageUp and PageDown that I can scroll through them (5) I saved the history to a variable, say, hhh (6) I dumped hhh to a file called hhh.R (7) I quit

On 23/07/2020 18:12, James B. Byrne via samba wrote: > > On Thu, July 23, 2020 16:16:30, Mani Wieser wrote: > >>>> ../../source4/nbt_server/interfaces.c:228(nbtd_add_socket) >>>> Failed to bind to 127.0.162.1:137 - NT_STATUS_ADDRESS_ALREADY_ASSOCIATED >> check where has port 137 occupied > There is nothing listening on 137 > > [root at smb4-2 ~

Hi Everyone, my first foray into Samba and AD both. Not sure if this is an OS or configuration problem. I've found similar issues, but nothing either recent enough (is related to samba 3) or close enough. FreeBSD-10.1-RELENG, Samba 4.2.2. I have the domain provisioned as rfc2307 I have joined a Win7-virtual machine to the domain I have created a new user with ADUC I have assigned 10000 to

I've got a server with several ip's on eth0. I want to block all traffic *except* to port 80 on them, but not on any other IPs, so that eth0 is www.xxx.yyy.zzz eth0:1 is www.xxx.yyy.ggg eth0:2 is www.xxx.yyy.hhh I've tried -A RH-Firewall-1-INPUT -p tcp -d www.xxx.yyy.ggg --dport ! 80 -j DROP -A RH-Firewall-1-INPUT -p tcp -d www.xxx.yyy.hhh --dport ! 80 -j DROP and restarted (and

Dear W.D. Do you understand that by adding the rules into kernel space numbered from zero to sixty five thousand five hundred thirty four you may alter the behavior of the rule number sixty five thousand five hundred thirty five can you please define and list the goals you are trying to achieve by altering default rule in the terms you can both explain and understand. ----- Original Message

Greetings, I have installed Dovecot under FreeBSD 5_3 It is pretty impressive. I got SSL working with no problem for both imap and pop3. Besides that I do still want to chroot Dovecot. I noticed that there are some options in the dovecot.conf that are intended for this. Unfortunately online resources on how to do that can't be found on google. Although I'm running the server as user

On 11/07/15 10:16, Rowland Penny wrote: > On 11/07/15 04:06, Lee Brown wrote: >> Hi Everyone, my first foray into Samba and AD both. >> >> Not sure if this is an OS or configuration problem. I've found similar >> issues, but nothing either recent enough (is related to samba 3) or >> close >> enough. >> >> FreeBSD-10.1-RELENG, Samba 4.2.2.

Hi friends, I have following data and would like to plot this with barchart() availble with lattice package. RsID Freqs Genotype AAA 63.636 1/1 AAA 32.727 1/2 AAA 3.636 2/2 BBB 85.965 2/2 BBB 14.035 2/1 CCC 63.158 1/1 CCC 21.053 1/2 CCC 15.789 2/2 DDD 26.786 2/2 DDD 46.429 2/1 DDD 26.786 1/1 EEE 32.759 2/2 EEE 43.103 2/1

On Wed, July 22, 2020 21:47, Andrew Bartlett wrote: > Are you using DLZ_BIND9? There is a bug where it doesn't know the locking rules for those files. No. I am using the internal dns service. > Otherwise, work out which commend it is waiting on (the child) and > what lock that is waiting on (lslocks on linux is what I used to > debug this stuff). There does not appear to be

On 23/07/2020 18:36, Jeremy Allison wrote: > On Thu, Jul 23, 2020 at 06:31:09PM +0100, Rowland penny via samba wrote: >> On 23/07/2020 18:12, James B. Byrne via samba wrote: >>> On Thu, July 23, 2020 16:16:30, Mani Wieser wrote: >>> >>>>>> ../../source4/nbt_server/interfaces.c:228(nbtd_add_socket) >>>>>> Failed to bind to

Dear R list, I have a dataset with a column which should be read as character, like this: name surname answer 1 xx yyy "00100" 2 rrr hhh "01" When reading this dataset with read.table, I get 1 xx yyy 100 2 rrr hhh 1 The string column consists in answers to multiple choice questions, not all having the same number of answers. I could format the

Hi peeps, After compiling ipfw into the new 6.2 kernel, and typing "ipfw list", all I get is: "65535 deny ip from any to any" From reading the docs, this might indicate that this is the default rule. (I am certainly protected this way--but can't be very productive ;^) ) By the way, when I run "man ipfw" I get nothing. Using this instead:

hi all, i have 2 x-lite version 3.0 softphones configured on extension 9000 and 9005. i have one call the other and then try and send an IM between them using the x-lite IM facility. the asterisk console shows the message... WARNING[27193]: chan_sip.c:11866 receive_message: Received message to "s"9005 at hhh> from "c"9000 at hhh>;tag=717de473, dropped it... when i

Hi, Im using dovecote as my IMAP interface. However i do have a lot of imap instances. its only 7 user using the system as i get this. please advice. 1230 ? S 0:00 imap-login 1309 ? S 0:00 imap-login 1387 ? S 0:00 imap-login 1388 ? S 0:00 imap-login 1389 ? S 0:00 imap-login 1390 ? S 0:00 imap-login 1391 ? S

A colleague of mine is trying to use nls() to effect an optimization, and is encountering a scoping problem. I should know how to solve it for him but .... well, I just don't. I also had a quick scrounge of the archives --- I know I've seen this topic addressed before --- but I couldn't track it down. So here's a toy example that demonstrates the problem: hhh <-

Hi all, I'm facing a problem when a user (q and g in this example) is logging into dovecot. Can anybody tell some hint? Thanks in advance. George /var/log/mail.log: ... Jan 8 16:18:28 test dovecot: User q is missing UID (see mail_uid setting) Jan 8 16:18:28 test dovecot: imap-login: Internal login failure (auth failed, 1 attempts): user=<q>, method=PLAIN, rip=AAA.BBB.CCC.DDD,

Can someone recommend a method to answer the following type of question: Suppose I have a coin with a probability hhh of coming up heads (and 1-hhh of coming up tails) I plan on flipping the coin nnn times (for example, nnn = 500) What is the expected probability or frequency of a run of rrr heads* during the nnn=500 coin flips? Moreover, I would probably (excuse the pun) want the answer for a