similar to: List Policy

Can a Solaris person take a look at this? -- | Damien Miller <djm at mindrot.org> \ ``E-mail attachments are the poor man's | http://www.mindrot.org / distributed filesystem'' - Dan Geer ---------- Forwarded message ---------- Date: Wed, 28 Feb 2001 12:33:48 +0200 From: owner-ssh at clinet.fi To: ssh at clinet.fi Subject: make 2.5.1p1 on Solaris8 Trying to build

Hello all, I'm trying to get a specific source file to run at a certain time each day with WindowsScheduler http://windows.microsoft.com/en-US/windows7/schedule-a-task I've tried a number of methods, none of which work: My best guess was: 1. Associate the script.R file with R in FileTypes. 2. Call the script.R file in the scheduler This definitely opens R, but the source file

Hello, rpm's for 6.2 also did not work here. ( With latest rpm, openssl,...) Compiling myself the binaries did not give any error and working fine. De Munter Erwin -----Original Message----- From: Damien Miller [mailto:djm at mindrot.org] Sent: Monday, March 05, 2001 11:56 PM To: Marco Fioretti Cc: openssh-unix-dev at mindrot.org; marco.fioretti at tiscalinet.it Subject: Re: SSH RPM for Red

Could you please try the below diff if you have been experiencing problems with the globbing support in the sftp client. There have been a few reports that it doesn't work on Solaris, etc. Index: ChangeLog =================================================================== RCS file: /var/cvs/openssh/ChangeLog,v retrieving revision 1.1022 diff -u -r1.1022 ChangeLog --- ChangeLog 2001/03/28

At 16:30 6/9/2001 -0600, you wrote: >broadcasting online. Nor are they subject to the compulsory license. Right.. it would be nice to see online broadcasters treated the same way. >There's still a possibility that the DMCA will be dismantled before the >arbitration is even finished. You shouldn't have to pay the RIAA >anyway, and the fact that they are even involved is

Dear all, from "Writing R Extensions": The string ?Unlimited?, meaning that there are no restrictions on distribution or use other than those imposed by relevant laws (including copyright laws). If a package license restricts a base license (where permitted, e.g., using GPL-3 or AGPL-3 with an attribution clause), the additional terms should be placed in file LICENSE (or LICENCE),

Well, I've finally gotten around to compiling and testing OpenSSH 2.5.2p1, in order to update the contrib/solaris packaging scripts. Somehow on my test system, I'm getting errors that indicate that I've still got some old copy of OpenSSL being found somewhere...but I can't for the life of me tell where. The compile went fine (it found the OpenSSL 0.9.5a libraries that I had

On 18.01.2017 00:13, Karl Millar wrote: > Please don't use 'Unlimited' or 'Unlimited + ...'. > > Google's lawyers don't recognize 'Unlimited' as being open-source, so > our policy doesn't allow us to use such packages due to lack of an > acceptable license. To our lawyers, 'Unlimited + file LICENSE' means > something very different

Portable OpenSSH 2.5.1p2 has just been uploaded and will be making its way to the mirror sites (http://www.openssh.com/portable.html) in due course. This release contains primarily bug-fixes over 2.5.1p1 but an upgrade is recommended. Specific bug-fixes include: - Fixed endianess issue causing failues when usin Rijndael/AES cipher - Fix PAM failures on Solaris and Linux - Fix RPM spec file

Portable OpenSSH 2.5.1p2 has just been uploaded and will be making its way to the mirror sites (http://www.openssh.com/portable.html) in due course. This release contains primarily bug-fixes over 2.5.1p1 but an upgrade is recommended. Specific bug-fixes include: - Fixed endianess issue causing failues when usin Rijndael/AES cipher - Fix PAM failures on Solaris and Linux - Fix RPM spec file

Portable OpenSSH 2.9p2 has just been uploaded and shall be making its way to the mirrors listed at http://www.openssh.com/portable.html shortly. This release fixes the "cookies" file deletion problem reported on BUGTRAQ as well as a few other minor (non-security) bugs. No new features have been added in this release. Regards, Damien Miller -- | Damien Miller <djm at

Portable OpenSSH 2.9p2 has just been uploaded and shall be making its way to the mirrors listed at http://www.openssh.com/portable.html shortly. This release fixes the "cookies" file deletion problem reported on BUGTRAQ as well as a few other minor (non-security) bugs. No new features have been added in this release. Regards, Damien Miller -- | Damien Miller <djm at

Can someone explain why we need this fix on Solaris 2.6? -- | Damien Miller <djm at mindrot.org> \ ``E-mail attachments are the poor man's | http://www.mindrot.org / distributed filesystem'' - Dan Geer ---------- Forwarded message ---------- Date: Tue, 6 Mar 2001 10:05:56 -0600 (CST) From: Sec. Acct. <secact at sun.twlight.net> To: ssh at clinet.fi Subject:

For people interested in playing with the Smartcard support in recent OpenSSH, I have built source RPMs of libsectok and sectok. Currently only the Todos reader driver is included, but I am happy to accept patches :) http://www.mindrot.org/~djm/sectok/ The RPMS build, install and function on Redhat Roswell (7.2 beta) YMMV -d -- | Damien Miller <djm at mindrot.org> \ ``E-mail

Could eveyone please give the latest snapshots a test? I have just pulled in some more OpenSSL libc code to support globbing in the sftp client. It works OK on the platforms that I have access to, but that isn't many... Report success/failure and host (as reported by configure). Thanks. -d -- | Damien Miller <djm at mindrot.org> \ ``E-mail attachments are the poor man's |

But the main question hasn't been answered: Why is /usr/local placed before user-specified paths? Hypothetical example: You want to link against OpenSSL 0.96 for OpenSSH, but /usr/local contains 0.95, which is needed for something else. (Assume it comes binary only on Solaris for the sake of argument...) --Matt > -----Original Message----- > From: Damien Miller [mailto:djm at

Please don't use 'Unlimited' or 'Unlimited + ...'. Google's lawyers don't recognize 'Unlimited' as being open-source, so our policy doesn't allow us to use such packages due to lack of an acceptable license. To our lawyers, 'Unlimited + file LICENSE' means something very different than it presumably means to Uwe. Thanks, Karl On Sat, Jan 14,

The Free Software Foundation maintains a list of free and GPL-compatible software licenses here: https://www.gnu.org/licenses/license-list.en.html#Unlicense It appears that Unlicense is considered a free and GPL-compatible license; however, the page does suggest using CC0 instead (which is indeed a license approved / recognized by CRAN). CC0 appears to be the primary license recommended by the

Could people who have been having issues with Portable OpenSSH and Kerberos 4 please try the following patch. You will need to run "autoreconf" (i.e you will need autoconf installed) and then run ./configure again. Index: configure.in =================================================================== RCS file: /var/cvs/openssh/configure.in,v retrieving revision 1.267 diff -u -r1.267

-- | Damien Miller <djm at mindrot.org> \ ``E-mail attachments are the poor man's | http://www.mindrot.org / distributed filesystem'' - Dan Geer ---------- Forwarded message ---------- Date: Thu, 8 Mar 2001 09:39:19 +0100 (MET) From: Martijn de Munnik <M.H.M.deMunnik at phys.uu.nl> To: openssh at openssh.com Subject: OpenSSH 2.5.1p1 won't compile on Solaris