similar to: Tatu Ylonen's message to the OpenSSH developers

Friends, Sorry to write this to a developer mailing list. I have already approached some OpenSSH/OpenBSD core members on this, including Markus Friedl, Theo de Raadt, and Niels Provos, but they have chosen not to bring the issue up on the mailing list. I am not aware of any other forum where I would reach the OpenSSH developers, so I will post this here. As you know, I have been using the SSH

I'd like to address several issues raised by people in relation to my notice of the ssh(R) trademark to the OpenSSH group. Also, I would like to make a proposal to the community for resolving this issue (included at the end). First, I'll answer a number of questions and arguments presented in the discussion. > "the SSH Corp trademark registration in the US is for a logo

On Solaris 10 (SPARC & x86), I'm seeing the following error: error: Failed to allocate internet-domain X11 display socket. I tracked this down to this code change between openssh 4.7p1 and 5.0p1: *** openssh-4.7p1/channels.c Mon Jun 25 03:04:47 2007 --- openssh-5.0p1/channels.c Wed Apr 2 15:43:57 2008 *************** *** 1,4 **** ! /* $OpenBSD: channels.c,v 1.270 2007/06/25 08:20:03

I would also like to mention that when I released TTSSH in May 1998, I had no concerns about violating any trademarks because I observed that the name "SSH" was already being used by several different parties for different purposes --- as the name of Ylonen's original SSH package and its derivatives, as the name of the protocol, and as a component of names of other implementations

>This issue has actually cropped up again recently in my testing. When I >do use Solaris login (UseLogin yes), a ton of the important environment >variables (like TERM, etc) don't get passed. Is that normal behavior? Looking at the source os session.c it is obvious that when you use login the environment is not passed: execl(LOGIN_PROGRAM, "login",

Hello, I have just installed OpenSSH 4.6p1 and it appears that ChallengeResponseAuthentication is not allowed unless I explicitly set it to "yes" in the sshd_config file. I am using the same config file as I did with 4.5p1 where it was allowed by default. Also, this is OpenSSH package from sunfreeware, but I believe that both versions were compiled with the same options. Is this the

In message <19991115105530.D12683 at alcove.wittsend.com>, "Michael H. Warfield" w rites: >Nov 15 10:45:38 alcove sshd[21731]: fatal: cipher_set_key: unknown cipher: 1 We do not use IDEA in OpenSSH anymore, it is patented in most countries. Your private key is encrypted with it, change the passphrase with the old ssh to nothing, then change the passphrase with OpenSSH to

Hello List, i have a general question. What SPNs should a member file server have? Mine only have "HOST/" Is this correct? Regards Christian -- Dr. Christian Naumer Unit Head Bioprocess Development B.R.A.I.N Aktiengesellschaft Darmstaedter Str. 34-36, D-64673 Zwingenberg e-mail cn at brain-biotech.com, homepage www.brain-biotech.com fon +49-6251-9331-30 / fax +49-6251-9331-11

Hi, attached is a patch by Chris Faylor <cgf at cygnus.com> relative to 2.2.0p1. Description: OpenSSH does not allow port gatewaying by default. This means that only the local host can access forwarded ports. Adding "GatewayPorts yes" to .ssh/config usually does this job. Unfortunately, OpenSSH does not recognize the same hosts.allow/ hosts.deny options as ssh.com's sshd

Hi folks, I have the that I must copy some through a Plag-Gateway of a Firewall over 2 host. A secure connection via "ssh - t hosta ssh -t hostb" works fine, but does this work with scp too? Icould not realize it either with scp (1.2.27 of ssh.com) or scp from openssh. Do you have any ideas? Thanks Stephan

Hi, I don't know enough C to know for certain if this is a programmer or compiler error: In a Objective-C source file I have: . static const char sessionEntriesKVO = ' '; . Later I use that variable as a ID by taking it's address like this: [feedManager addObserver:self forKeyPath:@"sessionEntriesCount" options:0 context:&sessionEntriesKVO]; and later . if

Hello, I have just set-up SSH on my UNIX systems. I can connect to all of them just fine using Win32 client. But when I try to ssh from one UNIX system to another I keep getting this message: RSA1 key fingerprint is fa:a2:ac:d6:58:a6:48:0b:cc:13:ea:b7:d5:bd:fd:de. Are you sure you want to continue connecting (yes/no)? When I choose yes to the above message it just keeps looping through, never

Dear R help I have a question on the variance of the binomial probit model. I have fitted the following model : > lmer1<-lmer(mp ~ l + op + l*op+ us_lev + bw_lev +(1|tatu) , + family = binomial(link="probit"), + method = 'Laplace', + data = matings, + msVerbose= True) > summary(lmer1) Generalized linear

Hello all, I have replaced the llvm-gcc shipped with the Xcode by the latest version and I was wondering if I have missed something... (everything *seems* to work). Here's what I did: 0. Checkout LLVM (and clang) + llvm-gcc 1. Build LLVM (with clang) and install into /Developer/usr/local : # mkdir llvmobj # cd llvmobj # CC=gcc-4.2 CXX=g++-4.2 ../llvm/configure

On 15.10.2008, at 3.42, Chris Lattner wrote: > > On Oct 14, 2008, at 12:52 PM, Tatu Vaajalahti wrote: > >> >> Hi, >> >> I don't know enough C to know for certain if this is a programmer or >> compiler error: > > Hi Tatu, > > With this information it is impossible to tell if it is your fault or > llvm's fault. Please file a bug with a

On Oct 14, 2008, at 12:52 PM, Tatu Vaajalahti wrote: > > Hi, > > I don't know enough C to know for certain if this is a programmer or > compiler error: Hi Tatu, With this information it is impossible to tell if it is your fault or llvm's fault. Please file a bug with a testcase that demonstrates the problem, thanks! -Chris > > > In a Objective-C source

On 15.10.2008, at 14.01, Pertti Kellomäki wrote: > Tatu Vaajalahti wrote: >> With this program llvm-gcc -O2 optimizes test2 away even though it's >> address is taken in program (gcc-4.2 does not, neither does llvm-gcc >> with -O or -O0): >> >> >> #include <stdio.h> >> >> static const char test1 = 'x'; >> static const char

Tatu Vaajalahti wrote: > With this program llvm-gcc -O2 optimizes test2 away even though it's > address is taken in program (gcc-4.2 does not, neither does llvm-gcc > with -O or -O0): > > > #include <stdio.h> > > static const char test1 = 'x'; > static const char test2 = 'x'; > > int main(int argc, char **argv) > { >

Tatu Vaajalahti wrote: > On 15.10.2008, at 14.01, Pertti Kellomäki wrote: >> Seems to me that it is perfectly legitimate for the compiler to fold >> the two char constants together. > True, but note that it is the address of a variable that is used, not > the value. I don't have the C standard handy, but I would be somewhat surprised if the standard would explicitly

Hello, Tatu > Is that correct? I think it's just something to be aware of. Currently we're aggressively merging globals by default. Do you think it will be better to provide special flag to control this behavior? -- WBR, Anton Korobeynikov