similar to: SSH trademarks and the OpenSSH product name

I'd like to address several issues raised by people in relation to my notice of the ssh(R) trademark to the OpenSSH group. Also, I would like to make a proposal to the community for resolving this issue (included at the end). First, I'll answer a number of questions and arguments presented in the discussion. > "the SSH Corp trademark registration in the US is for a logo

I received the following e-mail in response to an e-mail I had sent to SSH communications questioning the wisdom of their requesting OpenSSH to change it's name. Contained in the message is that statement that SSH Communications did not exert their trademark rights earlier becuase it's only recently that OpenSSH has become more visible. In the United States, this would invalidate the

I would also like to mention that when I released TTSSH in May 1998, I had no concerns about violating any trademarks because I observed that the name "SSH" was already being used by several different parties for different purposes --- as the name of Ylonen's original SSH package and its derivatives, as the name of the protocol, and as a component of names of other implementations

A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp Size: 3562 bytes Desc: not available Url : http://lists.mindrot.org/pipermail/openssh-unix-dev/attachments/20010214/5489bfec/attachment.bin

Dear SSH community, It has been brought to my attention that is has been disputed whether the term "SSH" can be used freely as a term to describe implementations compatible with the "SSH" protocols, due to trademark issues. In particular, the owner of the "SSH" trademark argues that implementations compatible with the "SSH" protocols shall no longer be

Hi folks, I have the that I must copy some through a Plag-Gateway of a Firewall over 2 host. A secure connection via "ssh - t hosta ssh -t hostb" works fine, but does this work with scp too? Icould not realize it either with scp (1.2.27 of ssh.com) or scp from openssh. Do you have any ideas? Thanks Stephan

On Solaris 10 (SPARC & x86), I'm seeing the following error: error: Failed to allocate internet-domain X11 display socket. I tracked this down to this code change between openssh 4.7p1 and 5.0p1: *** openssh-4.7p1/channels.c Mon Jun 25 03:04:47 2007 --- openssh-5.0p1/channels.c Wed Apr 2 15:43:57 2008 *************** *** 1,4 **** ! /* $OpenBSD: channels.c,v 1.270 2007/06/25 08:20:03

Old news, but ... http://lwn.net/Articles/298833/ I first posted about this back in 2001 and it's still not resolved: http://osdir.com/ml/ietf.secsh/2001-09/msg00000.html 1) high latency networks are a reality that will never go away. In fact they will only become more prevalent since distributed networks continue to grow broader but (surprise) the speed of light remains a constant. 2)

Hi, My name is Stefan Mangard and I plan to implement an extension to ssh as a final project in a cryptography class. Since I want to use an open source of ssh, I decided to use the openssh implementation. I am currently working with openssh-1.2.3, but I'd also like to implement my extension for protocol 2, I wanted to ask you how far the development of the implementation of openssh-2 is.

Hello, I was searching for this information virtually everywhere, but as I couldn't find it - I'm asking here. I was wondering, why setting the Compression Level was removed in SSH2, and if on, is always set to 6. In SSH1 it was possible to set the Compression Level from 1 to 9. I have made some tests with Compression Levels using scp: SSH1, compression 9 (highest available for

I have coded a patch witch allows to forward environment variables from the client to the server. To specify forwarding in your ssh client add the option ForwardEnv varname # forward varname with value # as in environment of the # ssh client. If variable is # not defined in the environment # of the ssh client nothing will # be forwarded. ForwardEnv varname=value # forward

Hello, I have just installed OpenSSH 4.6p1 and it appears that ChallengeResponseAuthentication is not allowed unless I explicitly set it to "yes" in the sshd_config file. I am using the same config file as I did with 4.5p1 where it was allowed by default. Also, this is OpenSSH package from sunfreeware, but I believe that both versions were compiled with the same options. Is this the

Hi, Is there some know problem between the 'scp' client in OpenSSH 2.5.1p1 and F-Secure's SSH 2.4.0 server? The client is running on a Linux (2.2.17) box and server is running on Win2K. When I try to transfer files it asks me for the password (which I provide) then it hangs. Using 'scp -v' didn't provide any helpful info; it's as though the problem happened before

Hello, I have the following problem: I want to use publickey authentication by using the publickey of a x509 certificate stored on a java card. I can already extract the publickey of the certificate and write it into a file. The problem i have is that i don't know how to convert the certificate's publickey into an rsa publickey format that openssh will accept. Does anybody have a

There was an interesting note in a recent fedoraproject.org newsletter regarding Redhat's legal views on referring to others' trademarks. Since the comments are lengthy, they are not reproduced here and are available at the links below. FWN/Issue161: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/FWN/Issue161#Legal Callaway note:

Greetings, Just wondering if there is an RFC describing the secure shell protocols? Thanks, Chris

On 12/26/19 6:35 AM, Stuart Henderson wrote: > On 2019/12/25 21:02, Steve Sether wrote: >> Basically I've had to turn on telnet access again, lowering security. > Does it really lower security? The very old embedded OS is not going to > be secure anyway, this type of device should only be used on a trusted > private network. (New embedded OS are often not much better so

Hi, I usually stay away from issues like this, basically because I'm not a lawyer (and don't want to be one), and I don't have a real interest in these issues. Quoting Tatu : > We also have a trademark pending on the Secure Shell mark This seriously undermines the IETF standard draft. It's the same as registering 'milk' as a trademark. Both Secure and Shell are

what about this? can we do about this if we break the protocol? -------------- next part -------------- An embedded message was scrubbed... From: Love <lha at stacken.kth.se> Subject: gss userauth Date: Fri, 22 Aug 2003 16:06:27 +0200 Size: 2878 Url: http://lists.mindrot.org/pipermail/openssh-unix-dev/attachments/20030822/f7bb85a0/attachment.mht

Hello, I apologize that this is slightly off topic. According to the Internet Draft I found for SSH ver 1 (draft-ietf-tls-ssh-00.txt from Jun 13, 1996), the client or server can send a SSH_MSG_KEXINIT at any time to force a new key exchange. I looked through the code for OpenSSH and ssh-1.2.27 and can't find where it does this. I then searched the Secure Shell mailing list archives and saw