similar to: Solaris 2.6 + Expired Password Annoyance

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 1000 matches similar to: "Solaris 2.6 + Expired Password Annoyance"

2001 Dec 11
1
Patch for ReliantUnix
Hi all, attached you find a patch for OpenSSH 3.0.2p1 configure which enables OpenSSH to again compile under ReliantUnix (due to utimes it is again needed to include /usr/ucblib/libucb.a) Sorry for not testing it before the release ;-( Best regards -- Udo Schweigert, Siemens AG | Voice : +49 89 636 42170 CT IC 3, Siemens CERT | Fax : +49 89 636 41166 D-81730 Muenchen /
2015 Jun 22
0
Bi-directional sync for Sysvol folder -- Osync?
Hai Min Wai Chan, ? I have tested it as shown in your example, and your correct. I?did a few test, but im very buzy atm. Few things i noticed. ? ? I?compaired the rights in linux and these are the same, but when i look at the rights in windows, these are different.. :-/ but wait.. Sync DC1 => DC2 , files and folder rights are ok, in windows and in linux Sync DC2 => DC1, files and
2015 Jun 24
0
Bi-directional sync for Sysvol folder -- Osync?
Hello, Just to share I've updated the guide to use osync. https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/SysVol_Bidirectional_Replication Enjoy Regards, Min Wai On Wed, Jun 24, 2015 at 2:44 AM, Min Wai Chan <dcmwai at gmail.com> wrote: > Dear Belle, > > That produce the similar situation. > > Thus I'm trying osync > > And the result are much present according to my test
2001 Feb 20
4
(Solaris) Linker flags in 2.5.1p1... (fwd)
Comments from the rest of the Solaris group? - Ben ---------- Forwarded message ---------- Date: Tue, 20 Feb 2001 11:20:33 +0100 From: Volker Paulsen <paulsen at orbiteam.de> To: mouring at etoh.eviladmin.org Subject: Linker flags in 2.5.1p1... While I'm compiling 2.5.1p1, I've got the following remarks: Host: sparc-sun-solaris2.7 Compiler: cc Compiler
2015 Jun 25
0
Bi-directional sync for Sysvol folder -- Osync?
Just some notes: For master <-> master setup (bi-directional sync) you need AFAIK a cluster filesystem. I have no idea how far this is supported w/ samab (ACLs, ...) Maybe a old tool related to drbd might be worth some testing too: http://oss.linbit.com/csync2/ Klaus ________________________________________ Von: samba-bounces at lists.samba.org [samba-bounces at
2015 Jun 25
0
Bi-directional sync for Sysvol folder -- Osync?
2015-06-25 14:12 GMT+02:00 Min Wai Chan <dcmwai at gmail.com>: > Dear Daniel, Klaus > > I've try that before > But because of how samba work on the files. > > The Advise is No > Without CTDB, you will just shoot yourself on the foot... > > > Maybe i'm wrong, but we are talking about the sysvol and the databases are out that folder. Sysvol only have the
2001 May 09
2
running sshd under AIX 4.3.3 ?
Hi, If anyone has managed to get sshd to run as a subsystem in the System Resource Controller under AIX 4.3.3 (a la mkssys), then please let me know how you did it... I can mkssys and startsrc it, but it dies immediately, leaving a child sshd running with another PID than startsrc reported, and lssrc reports sshd inoperative. Is sshd a process that should stay in foreground, not forking? Or does
2000 Jul 03
2
2.1.1p2 HP-UX 11 PAM General Commerical Security error
Trying 2.1.1p2 on HP-UX 11 (trusted system) I get: Jul 3 14:24:53 robinson sshd[1236]: debug: Encryption type: 3des Jul 3 14:24:53 robinson sshd[1236]: debug: Received session key; encryption turned on. Jul 3 14:24:53 robinson sshd[1236]: debug: Installing crc compensation attack detector. Jul 3 14:24:53 robinson sshd[1236]: debug: Starting up PAM with username "stevesk" Jul 3
2015 Jun 23
2
Bi-directional sync for Sysvol folder -- Osync?
Dear Belle, That produce the similar situation. Thus I'm trying osync And the result are much present according to my test case And configuration are much streamline. However, I'm not sure how it can work with 2 DC or more... Thank You On Mon, Jun 22, 2015 at 9:05 PM, L.P.H. van Belle <belle at bazuin.nl> wrote: > Hai Min Wai Chan, > > I have tested it as shown in
2011 Feb 02
2
yum confusion...
Hi, I just installed a new server and my final yum update fails... I have rpmforge and rpmforge-extras, but with yum priorities... # grep enabled /etc/yum/pluginconf.d/priorities.conf enabled = 1 # cat /etc/yum.repos.d/CentOS-Base.repo | grep "priority\|^\[" [base] priority=1 [updates] priority=1 ... # yum clean all # yum list | grep "tcp_wrappers\|nfs-utils"
2000 Nov 12
1
Free Sun patch 105710-01 provides /dev/random on Solaris (fwd)
Can anyone verify this and provide a URL for the docs? -- | ``We've all heard that a million monkeys banging on | Damien Miller - | a million typewriters will eventually reproduce the | <djm at mindrot.org> | works of Shakespeare. Now, thanks to the Internet, / | we know this is not true.'' - Robert Wilensky UCB / http://www.mindrot.org ---------- Forwarded message
2015 Jun 25
2
Bi-directional sync for Sysvol folder -- Osync?
Hi, I was thinking about bidirectional sync of sysvol and i've a question: ?What about DRBD?. You can create a disk partition in every node, create a DRBD cluster and then mount that partition on sysvol folder. The sincronization is bidirectional and in real time. For now i've not tested this option, but i've plans to start some tests. What is your opinion about this? Greetings!!
2015 Jun 25
1
Bi-directional sync for Sysvol folder -- Osync?
2015-06-25 14:44 GMT+02:00 Daniel Carrasco Mar?n <danielmadrid19 at gmail.com>: > > > 2015-06-25 14:12 GMT+02:00 Min Wai Chan <dcmwai at gmail.com>: > >> Dear Daniel, Klaus >> >> I've try that before >> But because of how samba work on the files. >> >> The Advise is No >> Without CTDB, you will just shoot yourself on the
2015 Jun 25
2
Bi-directional sync for Sysvol folder -- Osync?
Dear Daniel, Klaus I've try that before But because of how samba work on the files. The Advise is No Without CTDB, you will just shoot yourself on the foot... On Thu, Jun 25, 2015 at 7:39 PM, Zerwes, Klaus <zerwes at rosalux.de> wrote: > Just some notes: > For master <-> master setup (bi-directional sync) you need AFAIK a cluster > filesystem. > I have no idea
2004 Oct 31
2
[Bug 948] high CPU in sshd after tcp_wrappers deny
http://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=948 Summary: high CPU in sshd after tcp_wrappers deny Product: Portable OpenSSH Version: 3.9p1 Platform: Sparc OS/Version: Solaris Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: sshd AssignedTo: openssh-bugs at mindrot.org ReportedBy:
1998 Aug 05
6
Problem with TCP_wrappers
Hi, I''m running into something weird here. I''m using RH5.1 with tcp_wrappers 7.6. The syntax for hosts.allow and hosts.deny is: <service list> : <access list> [ : <shell_command> ] Everything works when I _don''t_ use the shell_command. I used the _exact_ line as in the man-pages utilising "safe_finger" (comes with tcp_wrappers), tcpdchk
2000 Jun 21
1
configure: error: Could not find working SSLeay / OpenSSL libraries
Hi, I've built and installed the openssl-0.9.1c package but openssh-2.1.1p1 configure can't apparently 'see' the package. I've tried adding the install directory to LD_LIBRARY_PATH, using CFLAGS, LDFLAGS, LIBS etc. The 'missing' rand.h is present n the included path shown in the config.log output below. What am I missing? Any help would be very much appreciated.
2000 Jun 28
0
Solaris 8 build and test of snapshot
Hi Damien (Miller), And compiles fine... (options below) on running, this seemed to be the only issue... debug: Command 'ipcs -a' timed out last and who both report correctly, including the full hostname for who... and probably nothing: debug: tvp!=NULL kid 0 mili 10 bout 50 times while using ssh... and on exit, this error message came up (this has been an issue with solaris for a
2000 Oct 02
1
OpenSSH 2.2.0p1 on Solaris 2.7 fails to compile
Greetings. I am a non-sub, but I read/searched the archive: I just can't for the life of it get OpenSSH to even *configure* on a Solaris 2.7 machine (UltraSparc-2). While minor difficulties (such as the --with-ssl-dir option somehow not fully working, as includes fail to see <openssl/rand.h> , easily overridden with a well-placed link from /opt/openssl -> /usr/local/ssl) have been
2010 Dec 03
1
[PATCH] upsd tcp_wrappers parsing and logging
Parsing bug was discussed here: <http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/nut-upsuser/2010-September/006230.html> Parsing bug summary ------------------- working /etc/hosts.allow: upsd 127.0.0.1 [::1] : ALLOW broken in /etc/hosts.allow: upsd localhost : ALLOW It looks like upsd originally intended to match nut username with system username? This is not the case now. This causes