similar to: 2.2.0p1 configure problems

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 1000 matches similar to: "2.2.0p1 configure problems"

2001 Mar 14
3
OpenSSH 2.3.0p1: HP-UX 11.00 64-bit
I have encountered a problem with using OpenSSH 2.3.0p1 on 64-bit HP-UX 11.00 systems. This bug does not exhibit itself on any 32-bit HP-UX 11.00 or HP-UX 10.20 systems that I have built 2.3.0p1 on. OpenSSH 2.3.0p1 was built with HPs ANSI C compiler with OpenSSL 0.9.6 and zlib 1.1.3. The problem is with the call to vhangup(2) in sshd when interactive sessions are started. The problem does not
2000 Oct 18
0
[SUMMARY] openssh: ld: mismatched ABI
Original question: ----------------- [..] What I am attempting to do is compiling openssh-2.2.0p1 on a C200 running 11.0 64bit. During configure, ld exits from building a test program stating: /usr/ccs/bin/ld: /opt/openssl/lib/libcrypto.a: Not a valid library (invalid magic number). Possibly a 64-bit PA archive library (Mismatched ABI). [..] Solution: -------- Many thanks to Albert C. Smith who
2007 Apr 18
1
[Bridge] Problem with bridge/8139too module under 2.4.27?
Hi there, I'm currently experiencing a minor problem using the bridge module under kernel 2.4.27 part of the Devil Linux distribution (http://www.devil-linux.org). The problem I am having is that when the bridge is unloaded during a reboot I receive the following errors in /var/log/messages: Nov 14 13:22:13 src@Devil kernel: unregister_netdevice: waiting for br0 to become free. Usage count =
2001 Nov 27
2
3.0.1p1 losing tty modes?
Hello, openssh-3.0.1p1 appears to transmit and parse tty modes correctly, but later in the code it uses vhangup() to close all tty references and reset the tty to default modes. I don't think that vhangup() should be needed on Unix98 ptys, possibly not even on BSD ptys, and I am probably wrong, so please tell me where. Of course vhangup() clears all tty modes, so you need to save them
2007 Sep 04
2
multiphasic growth curve analysis
Greetings R Help Group, How does one effect a multiphasic logistic growth model with 4 phases (e.g. Koops 1986; Weigel, Craig, Bidwell and Bates 1992; Grossman and Koops 2003) with R. Before writing to the group, the R help archives were searched, the web was searched with Google, Venables and Ripley 2002 was consulted, Pinheiro and Bates 2000 was consulted, Bates and Watts 2007 was bought and
2010 Feb 25
3
MeetMe() and dahdi_dummy on an embedded system
I'm playing around with an ALIX 2D2 board (http://www.pcengines.ch/alix2d2.htm). It's a fanless, x86 system using an AMD Geode processor with 256MB of RAM. Also available are two network interfaces, two USB ports and one serial port (no keyboard or VGA). I'm using the Voyage Linux distro, which basically is Debian Lenny optimized for this board. Asterisk 1.6.1.12 runs fine on the
2007 Feb 13
0
Research Position Statistical Computing in Biostatistics
X-Mailer: VM 7.17 under 21.4 (patch 18) "Social Property" XEmacs Lucid FCC: ~/mail/sent-mail From: Jan.Beyersmann at fdm.uni-freiburg.de --text follows this line-- hi everyone, please find below a job advert for a research position statistical computing in biostatistics, emphasis is on R and survival analysis. see also wangler et al., p. 31-35 in
2004 Aug 06
0
Re: Please confirm your message
speex-dev@xiph.org wrote: >Hello, this is the mailing list anti-spam filter at Xiph.Org. >We need you to confirm your e-mail message with the subject of >"realtime encoding". > >Please send a message to the following address, or simply use your >mailer's "Reply" feature. > > speex-dev+confirm+1052924039.22499.5a39af@xiph.org > >Rather
2008 Apr 01
2
Unknown internal error
Hello, I just found this message in our dovecot logfiles: "Disconnected: BUG: Unknown internal error" Should I worry about this ? There are no complaints yet (although it is not limited to one user). It seems to occur with different clients (Apple/MacOS mail, Windows/Thunderbird, Pine). We're running dovecot 1.0.10 on Solaris 10 with mboxes (NFS) and local index storage. There are
2003 Jan 31
1
svm regression in R
Hallo, I have a question concerning SVM regression in R. I intend to use SVMs for feature selection (and knowledge discovery). For this purpose I will need to extract the weights that are associated with my features. I understand from a previous thread on SVM classification, that predictive models can be derived from SVs, coefficiants and rhos, but it is unclear for me how to transfer this
2017 Feb 03
2
Compiling Dovecot on Solaris 10
Hi, thank You for a reply, compiling with Solaris Studio 12.5 solved this case. Martin Preen <preen at informatik.uni-freiburg.de> ra??: > Hello, > I don't have problems building 2.2.27 on Solaris 10 > (using Sun Workshop compiler 5.11). > > The configuration is the same as your. > Maybe a compiler/version problem on your system ? > > Regards, > Martin >
2011 Mar 30
1
wrong calculation of R-squared in summary.lm
Dear all, I just stumbled upon the fact, that when I perform a regression on multivariate responses, that are not centred, I get a ricilulously high R-squared value. After reading the code of summary.lm, I found a bug in the function summary.lm: mss is calculated by: mss <-sum((f - mean(f))^2) - where f are the fitted values. This works only for a single response variable, because
2015 Oct 22
0
C_LogLin (stats/loglin)
Kai, Apologies for the double message, it didn't go to the list last time. On Thu, Oct 22, 2015 at 9:59 AM, Kai Nitschke < kai.nitschke at uniklinik-freiburg.de> wrote: > > ?.Call? calls the C/C++ function ?C_LogLin?. But when I am running it line > by line I get > the following error on line 23/24: > Error: object 'C_LogLin' not found > > Hence, my
2000 Apr 11
2
LDFLAGS of the Makefile
I have compiled and installed OpenSSH 1.2.3 under AIX 4.3.3. The call to configure was: CFLAGS="-I/client/include -L/usr/ruf/lib" \ ./configure --with-egd-pool=/dev/urandom \ --with-afs=/usr/afsws \ --with-kerberos4=/client \ --with-tcp-wrappers \ --with-pid-dir=/etc \ --sysconfdir=/etc \ --with-ipv4-default \
2005 Feb 02
1
assertion failed in imap-bodystructure.c
Hello, I'm currently testing dovecot/imap (Version 0.99.13). I found this in the log: imap(xxxxx): [ID 265587 mail.crit] file imap-bodystructure.c: line 278 (part_parse_headers): assertion failed: (part->physical_pos >= input->v_offset - start_offset) dovecot: [ID 684838 mail.error] child 7376 (imap) killed with signal 6 The user tried to setup a new folder (with Thunderbird)
2005 Apr 12
2
assertion failed in 1.0-stable
Hello everybody, I get the following assertion error with dovecot 1.0-stable when accessing a large folder: file istream-raw-mbox.c: line 383 (istream_raw_mbox_get_body_size): assertion failed: (rstream->body_offset != (uoff_t)-1) There is no error when using dovecot 0.99.14. Any ideas ? Martin ----------------------------------------------------------------- Martin Preen, Universitaet
2005 Nov 30
0
F_UNLCK assertion
Hello, > I upgraded from alpha3 to alpha4 yesterday, and I am seeing > a few of the following asserts: > > imap(user): file mbox-lock.c: line 379 (mbox_lock_fcntl): > assertion failed: (lock_type == F_UNLCK) I'm getting this error too after upgrading to alpha4. > Gdb info on a couple of the cores is attached. It looks > like the arg lock_type for mbox_lock_fcntl()
2006 Feb 15
0
Solaris and T1
Hello, is someone using Dovecot with Solaris on a T1 cpu ? I would like to hear about pros and cons. Martin --------------------------------------------------------------- Martin Preen, Universitaet Freiburg, Institut fuer Informatik Georges-Koehler-Allee 52, Raum 00-006, 79110 Freiburg, Germany phone: ++49 761 203-8250 preen at informatik.uni-freiburg.de fax: ++49 761 203-8242
2009 Mar 18
1
NFS-error with dovecot 1.1.12
Hello, I'm testing version 1.1.12 and occasionally there is Mar 18 14:40:44 imap2 dovecot: [ID 107833 mail.error] IMAP(xyz): nfs_flush_file_handle_cache_dir: rmdir(/home/xyz) failed: Device busy It seems that it is related to a crash of the previous imap process of that user. And it doesn't seem to cause any problems. So can it safely be ignored ? It is on Solaris 10. Index storage
2009 Mar 19
1
largefile question
Hello, currently we're using version 1.0.13 with 32bit file offsets. Is it safe to switch to a new version with largefile support enabled ? We want to reuse existing index/cache or do we have to expect errors with that ? Regards. Martin --------------------------------------------------------------- Martin Preen, Universit?t Freiburg, Institut f?r Informatik Georges-Koehler-Allee 52, Raum