Displaying 20 results from an estimated 5000 matches similar to: "Binding to specific IPs/ports"
2000 Oct 07
1
specifying ip when forwarding?
With openssh, i can use -L x:y:z to forward a local port x to the remote host
y's port z. If the sshd server has more than one IP, is there a way to specify
which it binds to when forwarding the connection?
If not, this may be a feature you should consider adding?
--
-*% % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % *-
-* xercist *-
-* xercist at mindless.com *-
-* % % % % % %
2000 Nov 21
1
identd w/ openssh
I've just realised that when a user uses ssh to connect to a machine, then
sets up a port forward and uses it, the resulting connection is reported by
identd as belonging to root. While I realise ident is not any kind of
secure authentication, it doesn't make much sense to make it even less so
by letting any user create connections reported to be made by root.
The sshd should drop all
2020 Oct 22
2
Multiple IP addresses and using same IP for outbound calls as inbound
Hi George,
Thank you for the response. I'm a little unclear on what you mean by a
transport. We're using chan_sip, not pjsip.
Do you mean a device in sip.conf, using bindaddr to set the address to bind
for that device? We've only used bindaddr in the [general] section before,
but if it will work in a device that could be the answer.
On Fri, 23 Oct 2020 at 00:13, George Joseph
2004 Jan 10
5
Asterisk + BudgeTone (behind NAT)
I'm using Asterisk on a open server (no firewall or NAT) and trying to
communicate with a Grandstream BudgeTone 102 SIP phone which is behind
NAT. The BudgeTone is at firmware level 1.0.4.30 and Asterisk is from CVS
about a week ago. My problem is that I'm only getting half-duplex
communication -- I can hear voice from the Asterisk server but the server
does not understand any voice from
2020 Oct 22
2
Multiple IP addresses and using same IP for outbound calls as inbound
Hello,
We have an Asterisk server with two public IP addresses, let's say 1.1.1.1
and 2.2.2.2. Normally calls come in to 1.1.1.1 and are bridged with a call
dialled from Asterisk to an external destination. The external destination
sees the SIP packet as coming from 1.1.1.1 and the media address in the SDP
is 1.1.1.1, which is great.
However if we receive a call in to 2.2.2.2 then the call
2019 Dec 12
2
asterisk pjsip webrtc rtp to private IP
thank you very much. this is exactly whats needed for debug
example output for your info
[Dec 12 15:39:19] DEBUG[2182][C-00000000]: pjproject: <?>:
icess0x7f5d44081e88 .Added new remote candidate from the request:
2.2.2.2:57536
[Dec 12 15:39:19] DEBUG[2182][C-00000000]: pjproject: <?>:
icess0x7f5d44081e88 .New triggered check added: 1
[Dec 12 15:39:19]
2020 Oct 23
2
Multiple IP addresses and using same IP for outbound calls as inbound
OK, thank you George.
On Sat, 24 Oct 2020 at 03:16, George Joseph <gjoseph at digium.com> wrote:
>
>
> On Thu, Oct 22, 2020 at 4:13 PM David Cunningham <
> dcunningham at voisonics.com> wrote:
>
>> Hi George,
>>
>> Thank you for the response. I'm a little unclear on what you mean by a
>> transport. We're using chan_sip, not pjsip.
2020 Oct 30
3
Multiple IP addresses and using same IP for outbound calls as inbound
Why not use OpenSips/Kamailoo in between? Where you want 1.1.1.1 you pass
it along as is. Where you want 2.2.2.2 change the sdp in opensips/kamailio
On Thu, Oct 29, 2020 at 20:44 David Cunningham <dcunningham at voisonics.com>
wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Does anyone know a way with chan_sip to tell Asterisk to use a specific IP
> address for its end of the communication for a specific
2019 Dec 12
2
asterisk pjsip webrtc rtp to private IP
Asterisk is on public IP (as described in the first email)
i have 10 years experience in voip, 4 years webrtc in production. i know
about ICE/STUN/DTLS-SRTP. yes, not every detail but the basic mechanism
but i confess. i dont understand WHY Asterisk SOMETIMES switches
destination IP in RTP. this is not only about ICE. its about RTP engine
too which is Asterisk specific
and Asterisk DEBUG is
2019 Dec 12
2
asterisk pjsip webrtc rtp to private IP
with wireshark i need decrypt traffic every call which is time
consuming. get debug from pjnat through asterisk is not possible because
of technical reasons or nobody did it?
in my case its strange that ice candidates are the same
good call
v=0
o=- 3669976329745317845 2 IN IP4 127.0.0.1
s=-
t=0 0
a=msid-semantic: WMS EoNIdKcMZvWBLULGqGPJTDe12ujjFEemeapo
m=audio 52421 RTP/SAVPF 8 0 101
c=IN
2013 Mar 28
1
virt-manager connect remote KVM host and graphic control guest problem
Hi developer, i got a problem and need your help!(my english not very good)
My KVM host in IDC, and there are some restrict in there lead to me connect to KVM host by port 22 or 16509 impossible. In generally If i want login my KVM host i must login in to a "stepping stones" first, then login to that KVM host.( Now assume that the KVM host ip is 1.1.1.1 and the "stepping
2008 Jan 20
2
DNAT net to net (shorewall 3.2.6)
Hello,
On my systems i use shorewall 3.2.6.
Now all systems where replace by new ones with new ip''s.
So i tried with DNAT to map the old ip''s to the new one as long as DNS is
updated.
But i didn''t get it work.
I see in tcpdump that a connect from client-ip to new-server-ip is done
while connection the old on.
But i get no response.
Did i configure something in the
2002 Jan 03
5
quality settings
ARGH! I am at a complete loss as to which OGG quality settings to use: 8?
10? 3?
I'd like to be able to listen to my primarily Rock oriented music on a
high-end system (though I don't own one - yet) without any noticeable sound
degradation, but I don't want to go total overkill with -q 10. With LAME, I at
least used to know 192 kbps with -q0 was a perfect size/quality proportion. I
2012 Sep 14
1
Basic configuration problem
Hello,
I have been reading through the documentation and trying to set up a very
small VPN as a test for a larger rollout that I would like to complete in
the future but cannot get this working. The configuration seems like it
should be relatively simple, so I'm most likely missing something basic but
I just cannot see what I'm doing wrong. At the moment I am trying to get
this working
2004 Jul 26
1
Cisco IOS and racoon
I am trying to get a tunnel from a cisco 1760 with IOS 12.2.15.t13 to a
freebsd 4.9 install with racoon. I have package version
freebsd-20040408a and internal version 20001216 in my log file.
I posted the full racoon and cisco log below my configs.
Racoon keeps saying:
2004-07-26 16:24:03: DEBUG: isakmp.c:2295:isakmp_printpacket(): begin.
2004-07-26 16:24:03: DEBUG:
2015 Feb 03
1
Kickstart setup
On 02/03/2015 11:19 AM, Jay Leafey wrote:
> The documentation says that you can just put "vnc" (or
> "vncconnect={host}") in the kickstart file in the command section and
> proceed from there. Here's a link to an article in Red Hat Magazine
> that has a pretty good overview:
>
>> http://www.redhat.com/magazine/024oct06/features/kickstart/
>
> As
2016 Nov 21
4
nologin + reason -> logging reason
Hi.
I'm using nologin with own reason [1]. That works fine. For example pop3
client gets nice message like "-ERR [AUTH] Account is locked. Please contact
support."
Unfortunately maillog lacks information details about why user was not allowed
to log in.
pop3-login: Disconnected (auth failed, 1 attempts in 2 secs): user=<testuser>,
method=LOGIN, rip=1.1.1.1, lip=2.2.2.2,
2007 Mar 28
1
h323
hi
After compiling and installing pwlib and openh323 ,
the asterisk, give the folloing error.
please tell me where the problem is ?
Best
Mani
*CLI> -- Executing Dial("SIP/2.2.2.2-086f5ac0",
"H323/652#150388590962@1.1.1.1|60") in new stack
Mar 28 14:17:23 WARNING[11985]: channel.c:2576
ast_request: No translator path exists for channel
type H323 (native 4) to 256
Mar 28
2014 Jan 23
1
[Bug 887] New: iptables.xslt wrong "match" -m handling
https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/show_bug.cgi?id=887
Summary: iptables.xslt wrong "match" -m handling
Product: iptables
Version: 1.4.x
Platform: All
OS/Version: Debian GNU/Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: major
Priority: P5
Component: unknown
AssignedTo: netfilter-buglog at lists.netfilter.org
2016 Jun 20
3
https and self signed
On Sat, June 18, 2016 18:39, Gordon Messmer wrote:
> On 06/18/2016 02:49 PM, James B. Byrne wrote:
>> On Fri, June 17, 2016 21:40, Gordon Messmer wrote:
>>> https://letsencrypt.org/2015/11/09/why-90-days.html
>> With respect citing another person's or people's opinion in support
>> of
>> your own is not evidence in the sense I understand the word to