Displaying 20 results from an estimated 3000 matches similar to: "crc32() clashes with zlib function of the same name"
2003 May 27
1
[RESEND] crc32 optimization
Hi Samba
I noticed that the crc32 function in lib/crc32.c is somewhat
inefficient. This little patch will reduce the inner loop from 10
instructions to 8 instructions on x86 with gcc. gcc can't figure
out this simple optimization by itself on x86.
Further optimization is possible by using the impl. in the linux 2.5 kernel, but
I don't know if it is worth it. Is crc32 common in samba?
2005 Mar 01
1
Can crc32() assume to be available at the C level?
Dear R-develers,
Antoine Lucas suggested extending my small digest package (which provides md5
and sha-1 digests of R objects, which it are serialized if needed) with a
crc32 function, and provided a fairly complete patch.
We are now wondering if we should play it safe and bundle crc32.c (plus
utils) in the digest sources (as I do with md5 and sha1), or if we can assume
that crc32 is present on
2011 May 26
0
[LLVMdev] x86 SSE4.2 CRC32 intrinsics renamed
FYI,
The CRC64 intrinsics were renamed to CRC32 since there is no such thing. See below for details.
Chad
On May 26, 2011, at 4:13 PM, Chad Rosier wrote:
> Author: mcrosier
> Date: Thu May 26 18:13:19 2011
> New Revision: 132163
>
> URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project?rev=132163&view=rev
> Log:
> Renamed llvm.x86.sse42.crc32 intrinsics; crc64 doesn't exist.
2008 Jan 06
1
Is crc32 adequate to detect real-life data corruption in filesystem's blocks?
What about multiple errors detection with crc32?
Is it work?
Thanks.
2019 Feb 06
2
[PATCH] Remove unused since ssh1 protocol removal crc32.[ch]
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: 0001-Remove-unused-since-ssh1-protocol-removal-crc32.-ch.patch
Type: text/x-patch
Size: 20097 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.mindrot.org/pipermail/openssh-unix-dev/attachments/20190206/ca9d8d10/attachment-0001.bin>
2019 Jun 08
2
Kernel Image CRC checking
On 6/7/19 10:25 PM, H. Peter Anvin via Syslinux wrote:
>>
>> However, the CRC polynomial for zlib and the Linux kernel should both be the
>> same: 0x04c11db7.
>
> I just double-checked, and the CRC tables are indeed identical. I was pretty
> sure, because I wrote that code a long time ago...
>
Ah, it seems that zlib's CRC32 returns the binary inverse of the
2019 Jun 08
2
Kernel Image CRC checking
On 6/7/19 10:48 PM, H. Peter Anvin via Syslinux wrote:
> On 6/7/19 10:34 PM, H. Peter Anvin via Syslinux wrote:
>> On 6/7/19 10:25 PM, H. Peter Anvin via Syslinux wrote:
>>>>
>>>> However, the CRC polynomial for zlib and the Linux kernel should both be the
>>>> same: 0x04c11db7.
>>>
>>> I just double-checked, and the CRC tables are
2019 Jun 09
0
Kernel Image CRC checking
H. Peter Anvin wrote:
> On 6/7/19 10:48 PM, H. Peter Anvin via Syslinux wrote:
> > On 6/7/19 10:34 PM, H. Peter Anvin via Syslinux wrote:
> >> On 6/7/19 10:25 PM, H. Peter Anvin via Syslinux wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>> However, the CRC polynomial for zlib and the Linux kernel should
> >>>> both be the same: 0x04c11db7.
> >>>
>
2019 Jun 08
0
Kernel Image CRC checking
On 6/7/19 10:34 PM, H. Peter Anvin via Syslinux wrote:
> On 6/7/19 10:25 PM, H. Peter Anvin via Syslinux wrote:
>>>
>>> However, the CRC polynomial for zlib and the Linux kernel should both be the
>>> same: 0x04c11db7.
>>
>> I just double-checked, and the CRC tables are indeed identical. I was pretty
>> sure, because I wrote that code a long time
2005 Dec 08
2
[LLVMdev] Forwarded to llvm list ...
This was originally sent to Vikram Adve -- I have forwarded it to the list
as per his suggestion ...
Regards
Mark O'Neill
---------- Forwarded message ----------
Date: Thu, 8 Dec 2005 11:51:40 +0000 (GMT)
From: Mark ONeill <mao at raven.linux.ox.ac.uk>
To: vadve at cs.uiuc.edu
Cc: mflesner at cs.uiuc.edu
Subject: LLVM help ...
Dear Vikram
I spoke to you quite a long time ago about
2001 Nov 29
4
openssh 2.9p2 release 8.7 security alert!!!
Hi, everyone:
My system was compromised a few days ago.
The cracker attacked the system through openssh 2.9p2 release 8.7.
I attached part of the log file.
Thanks.
Pin Lu (pin at stredo.com)
Nov 25 11:33:05 ns sshd[10627]: Disconnecting: Corrupted check bytes on
input.
Nov 25 11:33:36 ns named[10478]: Lame server on '55.254.58.211.in-addr.arpa'
(in
2014 Aug 25
2
[LLVMdev] [cfe-dev] [3.5 Release] Release Candidate 3 Now Available
The ARM binaries seem to be corrupt. Although correctly signed, the xz file seems to be truncated
arm7% unxz < clang+llvm-3.5.0-rc3-armv7a-linux-gnueabihf.tar.xz | wc -c
unxz: (stdin): Unexpected end of input
133214381
M.E.O.
On Aug 21, 2014, at 10:56 AM, Bill Wendling <isanbard at gmail.com> wrote:
> Ahem. And now for the correct URL:
>
>
2019 Feb 19
0
[PATCH nbdkit 1/4] common: Move some GPT functionality to a common directory.
From: "Richard W.M. Jones" <rjones@redhat.com>
Headers and code related to GUID Partition Tables are moved to a
common directory to allow us to share that code across multiple
plugins and filters in future. This change is pure refactoring.
---
Makefile.am | 1 +
common/gpt/Makefile.am | 42 +++++++++++
common/gpt/efi-crc32.c
2017 Jun 15
2
Function Inlining and undef / poison question
Nuno,
One of your recent emails got me thinking about inlining.
I say this function is always well defined,
And it always executes statement S
F(a)
{
If (a == a) S;
}
And that if this function is inlined it must still be well defined,
And still always execute statement S
But if I read your example correctly you feel that the result
of inlining is undefined behavior because “if
2019 Jun 08
2
Kernel Image CRC checking
On 6/4/19 4:05 AM, Gene Cumm via Syslinux wrote:
> On Sat, May 25, 2019 at 8:33 AM Johann Obermayr via Syslinux
> <syslinux at syslinux.org> wrote:
>>
>> Hello,
>>
>> Is there a function to check a bzImage CRC ?
>>
>> If (ImageCRC("/bzImage") == -1)
>> Load_kernel("/BACKUP/bzImage") or what else
>>
2003 Feb 24
0
Compile errors on Solaris, early AIX and PAM platforms
Hi All.
Damien merged a bunch of changes today which caused compile errors on a
few platforms (which you can see live and in colour at [0]).
a) Solaris, early AIX:
../crc32.c:100: `u_int32_t? undeclared (first use in this function)
On these platforms u_int32_t is defined in defines.h which is not
included by crc32.c. Fixed by attached patch.
b) PAM platforms (Redhat, Solaris once a) is
2017 Oct 09
1
how to prevent files and directories from being deleted?
Mark Haney <mark.haney at neonova.net> writes:
> On 10/04/2017 08:22 AM, Gary Stainburn wrote:
>> On Wednesday 04 October 2017 12:54:44 Mark Haney wrote:
>>> Sorry, but if you have to use packages that don't originate from CentOS
>>> and they do that, then I wouldn't use them. Period.? I'd compile from
>>> source before I used something
2008 Jan 30
2
[rfc] Package to access the internal zlib library.
To make R.matlab's readMat work for me[1] I needed access to zlib's
uncompress function. R already links with zlib, and sometime last
year I hobbled together a quick package to get at a few functions.
It's my first package, so I would love feedback both on the package
and its purpose.
I've dropped a temporary copy at
http://jriedy.users.sonic.net/internalzlib_0.1.tar.gz
Could
2013 May 07
2
hiera not using non-root user custom fact
Hi,
Before I begin, my environment consists of a standard master/client config with the exception that all my clients run under a non-root user. I have to use non-root so I can''t simply restart under root to fix the problem.
Master -> 3.1.1
Client -> 2.7.17
using mostly the hiera() function in my classes.
problem:
I have run into an issue today where my custom fact is not
2017 Oct 04
0
how to prevent files and directories from being deleted?
On 10/04/2017 08:22 AM, Gary Stainburn wrote:
> On Wednesday 04 October 2017 12:54:44 Mark Haney wrote:
>> Sorry, but if you have to use packages that don't originate from CentOS
>> and they do that, then I wouldn't use them. Period.? I'd compile from
>> source before I used something configured that way.
> This perspective to some extent employs cutting your