similar to: Group permisions

> -----Oorspronkelijk bericht----- > Van: samba [mailto:samba-bounces at lists.samba.org] Namens Dan > Egli via samba > Verzonden: woensdag 28 oktober 2020 9:01 > Aan: samba at lists.samba.org > Onderwerp: Re: [Samba] odd issue with permisions > > On 10/27/2020 1:08 PM, Dan Egli via samba wrote: > > > >> What version of Samba ? > >> > >>

On 10/27/2020 1:08 PM, Dan Egli via samba wrote: > >> What version of Samba ? >> >> Please post your smb.conf >> >> Rowland >> >> > Sorry, Samba? version 4.11.2-13 is running on CentOS? 8.? My smb.conf is > shown below, sans comments: > > > [global] > > ??????? workgroup = EgliFamily > ??????? server string = Samba Server Version

On 10/27/2020 12:50 PM, Rowland penny via samba wrote: > On 27/10/2020 18:35, Dan Egli via samba wrote: >> I'm really confused about something. It seems like on my samba server >> the user AND GROUP permissions must match for me to access any files in >> my home directory. Here's an example of what I mean: ($ = at unix shell, >>> = in smbclient) >> $

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 This fixes garbage I'm seeing consistently from readlink /dev/disk/by-uuid/..... during boot. Signed-off-by: Rafi Rubin <rafi at seas.upenn.edu> - --- usr/utils/readlink.c | 4 +++- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/usr/utils/readlink.c b/usr/utils/readlink.c index 5ea4e41..75a0735 100644 - ---

http://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1089 Summary: StrictModes needs runtime granularity Product: Portable OpenSSH Version: -current Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P2 Component: sshd AssignedTo: bitbucket at mindrot.org ReportedBy: tad at

https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1786 Summary: ssh-copy-id's man page is misleading w.r.t. changing permissions Product: Portable OpenSSH Version: 5.5p1 Platform: All OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: minor Priority: P2 Component: Documentation AssignedTo:

Hi, could anybody with check in privileges apply the following patch to the contrib cygwin directory? It only updates ssh-host-config to create the *_config files matching the latest versions in the top level dir and it updates a version number in README. Thanks in advance, Corinna Index: contrib/cygwin/README =================================================================== RCS file:

I'm really confused about something. It seems like on my samba server the user AND GROUP permissions must match for me to access any files in my home directory. Here's an example of what I mean: ($ = at unix shell, > = in smbclient) $ mkdir ~dan/test1 $ chmod 700 ~dan/test1 $ smbclient -U dan //localhost/dan > cd test1 > put test1.txt (failure, NT_STATUS_ACCESS_DENIED) > quit

Commit-ID: 4a66f39cb53fde78c4518615382be83a9e2bff0b Gitweb: http://git.kernel.org/?p=libs/klibc/klibc.git;a=commit;h=4a66f39cb53fde78c4518615382be83a9e2bff0b Author: H. Peter Anvin <hpa at linux.intel.com> AuthorDate: Tue, 15 Apr 2014 09:27:38 -0700 Committer: H. Peter Anvin <hpa at linux.intel.com> CommitDate: Tue, 15 Apr 2014 09:27:38 -0700 readlink: Better buffer handling

I have one share (f.e. SYS) with mamy FOXPRO aplications in different folders. I've to gave to some people permisions to write and some people permision to readonly. share: \\samba\SYS with: drwxrwx--- root aplication1 aplication1 drwxrwx--- root aplication2 aplication2 drwxrwx--- root aplication3 aplication3 I have tree groups one for each folder in share (SYS) people

hi, i'm running smaba 3.0.4 with share level user and domain logon. as a first test i've created a direcotry using windows explorer. now i try to assing a group to this dir. when i click OK i get a messeage that tells me, that i'm not permited to do this. samba log shows: ==> log.smbd <== [2004/08/27 16:39:17, 1] smbd/service.c:make_connection_snum(619) pc48006

Good evening! I have installed samba 4.3.0pre1-GIT-6bbfb09 on centos 6.6 like active directory and domain controller. It turns out that, the past wednesday I lost  the administrative permissions of theadministrator and domain admins users. When I try to make a change at Remote Server Administration tool over one domain user says this: " the access rights are insufficient to carry out this

On 10/28/2020 2:49 AM, Rowland penny via samba wrote: > On 28/10/2020 08:00, Dan Egli via samba wrote: >> It's been over 24 hours and no one has even touched this. I could really >> use a bit of help. Yes, it works when I create the files/dirs in samba >> because of the masks I set, but that's just a kludge. It shouldn't >> matter that the GROUP permissions

Mandi! Dan Egli via samba In chel di` si favelave... > I posted the getfacl output a minute or two ago. I've had missed that. > Next idea? :) No one. But plain 'POSIX' access (eg, ssh) works? Eg if you try to redo the operation that does not work with samba using plain ssh access (with the same user), they works? -- dott. Marco Gaiarin GNUPG Key ID: 240A3D66

On 28/10/2020 10:24, L.P.H. van Belle via samba wrote: > Hm, samba 4.11.2-13 is running on CentOS? 8. > Im not really into CentOS/RH im more Debian/Ubuntu.. > > But I suggest you try this. > > Remove [homes] ( or keep it but add a new one. ) > > Setup > [users] > Path = /home > browseable = yes > read only = no > > Test again against that

On 10/28/2020 4:14 AM, Marco Gaiarin via samba wrote: > >> Next idea? :) > No one. But plain 'POSIX' access (eg, ssh) works? Eg if you try to redo > the operation that does not work with samba using plain ssh access > (with the same user), they works? > Yes, ssh works just fine.? Here's an example of it: [dan at jupiter2 ~]$ mkdir test3 [dan at jupiter2 ~]$ cd

On 10/28/2020 3:31 AM, Marco Gaiarin via samba wrote: > Mandi! Dan Egli via samba > In chel di` si favelave... > >> Why on earth would samba even CARE about group permissions when user >> permissions are perfectly fine? Help me fix this? > Consider that, if POSIX ACL are enabled on this FS, the group > permission are considered as a 'mask' for all ACL, with

Is there a risk associated with having authorized_keys files set to readable but "StrictMode no"? I am thinking particularly in the case of having public keys all centralized in a directory in /etc or something. Is it really a potential hack vector if someone can read a public key, or is the only real danger if they were writable? --- Don Hoover dxh at yahoo.com

We are using SAMBA 3.6.6 on Centos 5 with the acl_tdb VFS module. Our share is backed by storage on a SAN devices that does not support ACLs or extended attributes ... so we're trying the acl_tdb module as a mechanism to support Windows ACLs. We have verified that samba has ACL support enabled, and ACL support works find if we export the share from the local EXT4 filesystem. When trying to

On 28/10/2020 08:00, Dan Egli via samba wrote: > It's been over 24 hours and no one has even touched this. I could really > use a bit of help. Yes, it works when I create the files/dirs in samba > because of the masks I set, but that's just a kludge. It shouldn't > matter that the GROUP permissions are if the USER permissions allow > access and the file is owned by the