similar to: hmac format?

$ dovecotpw -p testpass {HMAC-MD5}fe8522268d91e485ccac8f36800e4fa6b10363e2a371cfa61731109b450906cd I wonder if the prefix 'HMAC-MD5' is the correct notation here. According to RFC2104 an HMAC is calculated as follows: H(K XOR opad, H(K XOR ipad, text)) where H is the cryptographic hash function (MD5 in this case). Therefore the result has to be a 128 bit string, which is obviously not

Greetings Debian Xen team, I spent a weekend getting 3.0.2-testing building and thought i'd share the love. Manoj and I are already working to update make-kpkg for the new Xen architecture. My repo is at: http://debian.thoughtcrime.co.nz/debian/ I have posted a Breezy-centric howto for this build at: http://debian.thoughtcrime.co.nz/debian/README.txt Hope you enjoy it, and hope we can

http://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1255 Summary: Solaris contract support has a problem Product: Portable OpenSSH Version: 4.4p1 Platform: All OS/Version: Solaris Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: sshd AssignedTo: bitbucket at mindrot.org ReportedBy:

I'd like to announce that the UK Male English Voices are now up on http://www.tel.net/ There's a complete set of base sounds and additional sounds (it should be complete compared to current Asterisk and Asterisk-Sounds-1.2.1). There's also a set with the word 'pound' replaced by 'hash' for both the base and additional sounds (only the actual replacements not a

http://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1239 Summary: OpenSSL ENGINE support broken on Solaris using Sun Studio compiler Product: Portable OpenSSH Version: 4.4p1 Platform: Other OS/Version: Solaris Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: Build system AssignedTo:

I'm trying to create an R script that will execute the HMAC algorithm for key-hashing messages. My hope is to use this script for some web authentication via R. The algorithm is found at http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc2104.txt Here is some example code that I have done that does not work for HMAC-MD5. I'm a big confused by the algorithm since I don't have a very good working knowledge

Hello I have recently had to reinstall Centos 7.5 to on host computer. I have not be able to set-up qemu to support the q35 chip set. I have several virtual machines that require q35. This is not my first install, I have configured libvirt on many machines in the past, it just worked, it has not required any manual configuration. [root at sj aadmin]# /usr/libexec/qemu-kvm -machine help

Hello, A little informal input on the TCP/UDP checksum deferral/offload: it fails for me. I have one Xen host, running a snapshot of xen-unstable at 2006-03-24 (9435:11fee62328cc). Each of its domUs are allocated their own /30, with the help of a hacked-up vif script. Prior to working around the problem, Domain-0 could establish TCP connections to other domains. In the case of SSH, it would

Hi all I have built new packages today, moved to a new webhost as well as written up a howto for using my packages. You can view this here: http://debian.thoughtcrime.co.nz/ubuntu/README.txt Thanks Tom _______________________________________________ Xen-users mailing list Xen-users@lists.xensource.com http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users

What is the best alternative for getting the IVR and other prompts recorded for Asterisk. Regards, Sanjay.

On 27 November 2016 at 16:51, Amara Emerson <amara.emerson at gmail.com> wrote: > There is nothing to stop other targets from using > stepvector/seriesvector. In fact for wide vector targets, often the IR > constant for representing a step vector is explicitly expressed as > <i32 0, i32 1, i32 2..> and so on (this gets really cumbersome when > your vector length is

Hi, Got a new one on 2.2.13: Sep 19 04:11:39 moxi dovecot: imap(cen at cor.ed): Error: Log synchronization error at seq=3,offset=144 for /Maildir/.Spam/dovecot.index: Extension record update for invalid uid=494 Sep 19 04:11:39 moxi dovecot: imap(cen at cor.ed): Warning: fscking index file /Maildir/.Spam/dovecot.index Sep 19 04:11:39 moxi dovecot: imap(cen at cor.ed): Panic: file

https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2023 Damien Miller <djm at mindrot.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|RESOLVED |CLOSED --- Comment #2 from Damien Miller <djm at mindrot.org> --- Set all RESOLVED bugs to CLOSED with release

Update of /home/CVS/tinc/cipher/hmac In directory humbolt:/tmp/cvs-serv2778/cipher/hmac Modified Files: Makefile.am Makefile.in Log Message: Include system.h and cipher/hmac/hmac.h in the distribution; the blowfish cipher is now in PKGDIR/libcipher_blowfish.so.0. - Tinc: Discussion list about the tinc VPN daemon Archive: http://mail.nl.linux.org/lists/ Tinc site:

Hi, I could not use hmac-sha2-256 in OpenSSH 6.2p1. I tried configuring in sshd_config file also, but the server was not starting. How can I use hmac-sha2-256 & hmac-sha2-512 in OpenSSH server in accordance with RFC 6668? I have installed OpenSSH in a computer with the following configuration: Architecture: x86 32-bit OS: RHEL AS 4 (Nahant update 4) (Linux version 2.6.9-42.EL) Thanks and

Hi. I've got the following problem with our SSH client library: - client connects to OpenSSH 5.9+ server and they choose hmac-sha2-512 with diffie-hellman-group-exchange-sha256. - client sends MSG_KEX_DH_GEX_REQUEST DH group request with parameters (1024, 1024, 8192). I.e. minimum and preferred group size is 1024-bit, - OpenSSH server in kexgexs.c:kexgex_server processes this message and

https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2588 --- Comment #3 from Damien Miller <djm at mindrot.org> --- retarget unfinished bugs to next release -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching the assignee of the bug. You are watching someone on the CC list of the bug.

https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2588 Damien Miller <djm at mindrot.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |2594 --- Comment #4 from Damien Miller <djm at mindrot.org> --- retarget unfinished bugs to next release

https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2588 --- Comment #5 from Damien Miller <djm at mindrot.org> --- retarget unfinished bugs to next release -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching someone on the CC list of the bug. You are watching the assignee of the bug.

https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2588 --- Comment #6 from Damien Miller <djm at mindrot.org> --- retarget unfinished bugs to next release -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching the assignee of the bug. You are watching someone on the CC list of the bug.