similar to: SOCKS support

Is there any plan to add socks 4 or socks 5 support to openssh like the original ssh developed in finland?? Michael Michael at bizsystems.com

Hi! This is not exactly a development contibution but more an expression of opinion. Didn't find a better place to send this to. I've been using openssh on Linux for some time now. Works just fine with one exception. Since I work at a company which likes to live behind a wall we use a socks firewall for allowing some connections to the world (we *should* be a part of it, but I'm not

Since I use the Dante SOCKS library (instead of the NEC libraries), I decided to hack support for them into OpenSSH. Here is the results. Thanks, David $NetBSD$ --- configure.in.orig Wed Dec 29 08:37:01 1999 +++ configure.in Wed Dec 29 08:37:25 1999 @@ -334,6 +341,20 @@ AC_MSG_WARN([*** Disabling lastlog support *** ]) AC_DEFINE(DISABLE_LASTLOG) fi + +dnl Compile with dante SOCKS library

Hi, I am running centos server 4.2 and I have installed dante-server socks proxy I yumed it off a dag repo. The problem I am having is configuring it. I have edited the sockd.conf file but it still tells me that I don''t have an internal address setup. Does anyone have any suggestions. am I editing the wrong config file. if I do a locate sock*.conf I get the following list

Attached is a very small patch that allows the ssh clients to use the socks5 library. It should work with socks4 but is untested. Tested on linux only configure --with-socks configure --with-socks5 Also included is a configure option to disable scp statistics --disable-scp-stats modified files openssh-2.9.9p2/acconfig.h openssh-2.9.9p2/channels.c openssh-2.9.9p2/configure.in

is openssh going to ever contain socks4/5 proxy support (http://www.socks.nec.com/) the same way ssh (nonfree version) does? Without this support, openssh is completely unusable behind a firewall. Hayden A. James

Hi, I need to setup a socks server on my Centos 4.2 box. I need to have windows clients connect to a remote socks server to force all their traffic through a content filtered proxy server. Does anyone have any suggestions on a good socks server that will work with Centos Thanks Mace

> On Mar 28, 2024, at 13:24, Jochen Bern <Jochen.Bern at binect.de> wrote: > > ?[ProxyCommand with 'nc'...] if you know how disparate the options of "nc"/netcat can look from one distrib to the next, you'll immediately know why this suggestion has me concerned. :-} I may be misremembering or completely wrong, but isn't 'ssh -W' intended to be a

The following code snippet will not compile support for RSAref on NetBSD even if it exists on the system (which breaks OpenSSL): for WANTS_RSAREF in "" 1 ; do if test -z "$WANTS_RSAREF" ; then LIBS="$saved_LIBS -lcrypto" else LIBS="$saved_LIBS -lcrypto -lRSAglue

I have a network without a network connection to other networks. But a socks server is dual homed between it and other networks. I can use socks to ssh to other networks. I use ProxyCommand with the socks aware connect.c program to connect out. All works great. I discovered while trying to use the ssh-keyscan program that it does not use the ProxyCommand configuration. At least in my testing

Hello, Anyone know socks5 proxy in centOS? For linux I know "delegate" but can not locate rpm package. I am trying to make something like this: client->squid:3128->[socks proxy]:8118->[ssh socks5 proxy]:port- >sshd:22-> -- -- Publicidad http://www.pas-world.com

im trying to compile lftp with socks support and im getting the following.. ... checking for msgfmt... /usr/bin/msgfmt checking for gmsgfmt... /usr/bin/msgfmt checking for xgettext... /usr/bin/xgettext checking for msgmerge... /usr/bin/msgmerge checking for CFPreferencesCopyAppValue... no checking for CFLocaleCopyCurrent... no checking for GNU gettext in libc... yes checking whether to use NLS...

Am 10.06.2016 um 21:22 schrieb Alexander Dalloz: > Am 10.06.2016 um 19:46 schrieb Jason Welsh: >> im trying to compile lftp with socks support and im getting the >> following.. >> >> ... >> checking for msgfmt... /usr/bin/msgfmt >> checking for gmsgfmt... /usr/bin/msgfmt >> checking for xgettext... /usr/bin/xgettext >> checking for msgmerge...

> Winton-- > > Excellent! Absolutely wonderful. > > I'm wondering which apps/encapsulators support 4A? This gets me > around > the DNS leakage problem quite nicely. > > Incidentally, we do need SOCKS5 support -- if for no other > reason, the > fact that there's *operating system* level support in OSX for SOCKS5 > redirection. So

On Fri, May 11, 2001 at 04:26:57PM -0400, Ault, James R (CRD) wrote: > I was reading the changelog from version 2.9 that was recently released, and I coudln't help noticing > this item: > > from openssh changelog: > > - markus at cvs.openbsd.org 2001/04/17 12:55:04 > [channels.c ssh.c] > undo socks5 and https support since they are not really used and >

Hi! I noticed that `ssh -D /tmp/socket $myhost` will actually provide a socks server listing on the unix domain socket /tmp/socket (this does not appear to be documented, though it is semi-documented for -L and -R). Do you know of any "socksification" script to go along with it, in the spirit of tsocks of socksify (from dante)? Those do not seem to support socks servers running on

I have a few patches for AIX. The patchfile is attached below. The patch has been tested on AIX4.2 and AIX4.3. The patch is on openssh-1.2.1pre25, with openssl-0.94, using RSAref. 1) authenticate support - this function allows the system to determine authentification. Whatever the system allows for login, authenticate will too. It doesn't matter whether it is AFS, DFS, SecureID, local.

http://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1118 Summary: Annoying "Killed by signal 1" message with ProxyCommand Product: Portable OpenSSH Version: 4.2p1 Platform: Other OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: ssh AssignedTo: bitbucket at mindrot.org

Hi folks, I'm wondering if it is possible to set up a dynamic port forward (i.e. socks proxy), where the listening socket is actually on the server rather than the client as is currently the case for -D ? A possible use case is providing a deeply firewalled box with an outbound SOCKS proxy, but only while an inbound ssh connection is active. Or, in my particular case, I have many routers

https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1572 Summary: accept SOCKS requests over the mux socket in master mode Product: Portable OpenSSH Version: -current Platform: All OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P2 Component: ssh AssignedTo: unassigned-bugs