similar to: [Bug 1937] New: Make it possible to give a give an ssh session only access to a limit subset of ssh-agent keys

https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1936 Bug #: 1936 Summary: -A command not available from ~C Classification: Unclassified Product: Portable OpenSSH Version: 5.8p1 Platform: All OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P2 Component: ssh AssignedTo:

Hello list, I am trying to prepare a USB disk with syslinux that is meant to be able to offer a choice among many different distributions. The goal is that I should be able to dump each distribution's CD contents into a separate subdirectory, and have a master menu that hands off to each distribution's subdirectory. A while back, when faced with a similar task on a PXE server, I came

https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1937 chrysn at fsfe.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |chrysn at fsfe.org --- Comment #3 from chrysn at fsfe.org --- the ssh-agent-filter program[1] would make the workaround you suggested

https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1937 Christian Kujau <mindrot at nerdbynature.de> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |mindrot at nerdbynature.de -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching the assignee of the

hi all I've a few guest which work/run perfectly fine, I believe, except for autostart. Configuration of system, gluster and libvirt is pretty regular and not complex. Errors I see: ... failed to initialize gluster connection (src=0x7f9424266350 priv=0x7f94242922b0): Transport endpoint is internal error: Failed to autostart VM 'rhel-work2': failed to initialize gluster connection

Hi I want to give parameters for my function from the shell. I mean I defined a function like these: work1.R : myfunc <- function(x,y) { z = x + y z } and now I want to use shell to give parameters like " ./work1.R (3,5) " to get sum 8. so what should I do? [[alternative HTML version deleted]]

I've got Samba up and running on my network, with relativley few problems, but I'm having a problem with subfolders. Lets take this snippet from my smb.conf as an exanple and then I'll move on [Documents] comment = office documents path = /usr/smb_files/documents public = no writeable = yes write list = @secretaries borwseable = yes Let me use this example

It seems that users may be disclosing unintended public key info when logging into remote hosts. Use of the words keypair/keyid/etc have been bastardized. Signature is likely better. Note also, the author may be without clue. Setup: [g] - refers to an administrative group of hosts [n] - refers to a host within that group ws[g][n] - management workstations [trusted] User ssh-add's keys for

https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3555 Bug ID: 3555 Summary: ForwardAgent doesn't work under Match canonical Product: Portable OpenSSH Version: 8.4p1 Hardware: amd64 OS: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 Component: ssh Assignee: unassigned-bugs at

Hi, all, Samba version 3.2.1 tar ball is downloaded. Next, I'm facing how to configure it for ARM Linux, but it's not so smooth for me. : ( The following is my environment information: 1. Development environment : Linux PC 2. Cross compiler : scratchbox/compilers/arm-gcc3.4-uclibc0.9.28 3. Configure options : (almost of them are googled) $ ./configure --without-krb5

Sounds like a bug in vector promote. If I restore this flag and use -promote-elements=0 everything works for me. Please fill a PR in LLVM bugzilla and assign to Nadav. On Mon, Jun 25, 2012 at 5:04 PM, Sebastien DELDON-GNB <sebastien.deldon at st.com> wrote: > Hi all, > > > considering following .ll file > > ; ModuleID = 'vect3x.ll' > target triple =

Hi all, considering following .ll file ; ModuleID = 'vect3x.ll' target triple = "armv7-none-linux-gnueabi" define arm_aapcscc void @test_hi_char8(i8* %.T0351, <8 x i8>* nocapture %srcA, <4 x i8>* nocapture %dst) noinline { L.entry: %0 = tail call arm_aapcscc i32 (...)* @get_global_id(i8* %.T0351, i32 0) %1 = bitcast <8 x i8>* %srcA to <4 x i8>*

It appears there is an opportunity for a denial-of-service attack against ssh-agent when using ForwardAgent. This note describes the circumstances, and provides a patch. Background (not the vulnerability): If ssh-agent is forwarded to a compromised account, a remote attacker could use the connection to authenticate as the owner of the agent. "ssh-add -c" currently defends

Because ForwardX11 and ForwardAgent are so useful but introduce risk when used to a not well-secured server, I added a "warn" value to the ForwardX11 and ForwardAgent options which causes the ssh client to print a big warning whenever the forwarding is actually used. I plan to make "ForwardX11=warn" the default in my ssh_config distribution. I'm not proposing that this

Hi all, I have a question about a multi-homed Samba file server and interoperability with AD. It's a bit complicated, so please bear with me. I've been running Samba 4.11.6 as an AD server (two DCs) for a while (in RFC2307 mode) in a mixed Windows/Linux environment. I have a server running Proxmox (Debian) with Samba 4.9.5 and it is sharing my huge ZFS volume via Samba to Windows

https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2438 Bug ID: 2438 Summary: Warn about using ForwardAgent with all hosts Product: Portable OpenSSH Version: 6.9p1 Hardware: Other OS: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P5 Component: ssh Assignee: unassigned-bugs at

https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1499 Summary: Add "ForwardAgent ask" to ssh_config Classification: Unclassified Product: Portable OpenSSH Version: 4.7p1 Platform: All OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P2 Component: ssh AssignedTo: unassigned-bugs

hi samba fellows, It is my first time to ask questions in samba mail list. Very sorry if my question is very naive. The problem is when I write to a non-existent file from windows to a linux export, there will be an extra readdir operation triggered. If I write to an existent file, no readdir operation will be triggered. How could I avoid the extra readdir operation in all cases when I am just

https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=831 kl_other+mindrot at icloud.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |kl_other+mindrot at icloud.com --- Comment #3 from kl_other+mindrot at icloud.com --- Patch needs to be updated, as it will

Hi Anton & Nadav, I filled this problem a while ago here http://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=13111 Thinking it first was an LLVM opt bug. Shall I assign it to Nadav or create a new one ? Seb ________________________________________ De : Anton Korobeynikov [anton at korobeynikov.info] Date d'envoi : lundi 25 juin 2012 15:31 À : Sebastien DELDON-GNB Cc : LLVMdev at cs.uiuc.edu; Rotem,