similar to: [Bug 1826] New: increase NF9_SOFTFLOWD_MAX_PACKET_SIZE

https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1831 Summary: Repeatable crash of softflowd on high PPS collector? Product: softflowd Version: -current Platform: amd64 OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: softflowd AssignedTo: djm at mindrot.org ReportedBy:

https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1441 Summary: flow record for ICMP6 missing type and code values Classification: Unclassified Product: softflowd Version: -current Platform: amd64 OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: softflowd AssignedTo: djm at

https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1944 Bug #: 1944 Summary: Wrong "Date flow start" and "Duration Proto" in version 9 with nfcapd Classification: Unclassified Product: softflowd Version: -current Platform: amd64 OS/Version: FreeBSD Status: NEW Severity:

https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1760 Summary: Timestamp offset using softflowd with nfdump Product: softflowd Version: -current Platform: ix86 OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: major Priority: P2 Component: softflowd AssignedTo: djm at mindrot.org ReportedBy: stephen at

https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1959 Bug #: 1959 Summary: Incorrect Sequence Numbers for NetFlow v9 export. Classification: Unclassified Product: softflowd Version: -current Platform: All OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: major Priority: P2 Component: softflowd

https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1836 Summary: "undesired" behavior when using the -r flag Product: softflowd Version: -current Platform: All OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: softflowd AssignedTo: djm at mindrot.org ReportedBy: daan

TEQL and Subnet problem I have a network topology shown below, and I am trying to use TEQL. P1, P2 and P3 are three linux machines, and each has two network cards. P2 and P3 are connected in two ways: (1) directed connection between P2.eth0 and P3.eth0; (2) connection via P1. P1 acts as the gateway. TEQL is installed on P2 and P3 to load-balance packet transmission by round-robin sending packets

TEQL and Subnet problem I have a network topology shown below, and I am trying to use TEQL. My problem is: When I ping to P3.teql0 from P2 ("[P2]# ping 16.119.144.66"), the traffic can never go from P2.eth1, and all traffic only goes to P1.eth0. What P2.eth1 (16.119.144.33) did is broadcasting an ARP asking for the MAC address of 16.119.144.66, although I have specified the route to

Hello Im having a problem similar to sawar Here is my configuration --------------eth1---192.168.1.128---------- -------------192.168.1.1 ISP router 1 | my | ---Eth0---192.168.10.157----| | | linux |

Hi List, I''m in the process of setting up softflowd 0.9.9 on a Centos 6.4 system (compiled from source tarball). The daemon will listen to an unused interface that is receiving port mirrored traffic (a.la. Span port) I am planning on using the softflowd init script and sysconfig file provided in the tar ball. Do I need to manually put the unused interface into promiscuous mode, or

https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/show_bug.cgi?id=870 Summary: Iptables cannot block outbound packets sent by Nessus Product: iptables Version: 1.4.x Platform: x86_64 OS/Version: Ubuntu Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 Component: iptables AssignedTo: netfilter-buglog at lists.netfilter.org

I was trying to do some performance testing between using iSCSI on the host as a diskfile to a guest vs the VM guest using the iSCSI device directly. However, in the process of trying to establish a baseline performance figure, I started increasing the MTU settings on the PCI-express NICs with RTL8168B chips. First bottleneck was discovering the max MTU allowed on these is 7K instead of 9K but

Hi all, I read the setup at http://www.blackh0le.net/articles/vpn-dun-howto.html to setup my VPN. However, I'm having a problem which I think is proxy-ARP not working. I like to ask you to see if you know what's going on. When I ping 10.77.1.1 from windows XP machine the packets get to the 10.77.1.1 machine, but they don't have a return path to get back. When I do ping the windows

http://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1014 Summary: SCP slow bandwidth with Solaris8 on n240 Product: Portable OpenSSH Version: 3.7.1p2 Platform: ix86 OS/Version: SunOS Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: scp AssignedTo: openssh-bugs at mindrot.org ReportedBy:

After a few days of troubleshooting, we finally determined why we were having problems. It seems as though the tftp-hpa daemon requires the MTU of the interface it's running on to be >= 1500. We had the MTU set at 1400 (don't ask why) and the PXE client was receiving fragmented packets and failing. As soon as we set it to over 1500, it worked fine. hpa, Could you please update

On Thu, May 14, 2015 at 10:12:40AM +0200, Florent B wrote: > > I have no experience with Ubuntu, but I find it hard to believe it would > > block ICMP Fragmentation Needed packets out of the box. > > I can confirm you that this is the case. Ubuntu ignores those ICMP > packets... :( (rp_filter settings) > > You can see it here : https://mellowd.co.uk/ccie/?p=5662

Hi, Is anyone here using the "Network Connect" VPN software from Pulse Secure (which was previously known as Juniper Networks Network Connect)? I've used this successfully in the past to connect to the machines at work from home. That was with CentOS 6, though, on CentOS 7 I can't seem to get it to work. The software actually starts, and it also successfully sets up a

Clients: Some sites just show the top area not the full page. Some sites cant be reached at all. I think it 90% may be the MTU/MSS problem. But I already have set the shorewall.conf CLAMPMSS=1400 or CLAMPMSS=Yes, but it doest make things good. I would be mad. Anybody helps me would so appreciated! If you want know more info. to diag my problem, I would be please to.

A site I administer has dual T1''s. We have this set up according to NANO-HOWTO[1] using Julian''s routes patch on a late model 2.4 kernel. All is well, has been working well for a long time. Recently one of our T1 providers went belly up and we got something better. Now we have a /28 where previously we only used one IP per interface. Present interfaces: eth0 - T1#1, single

Apologies if this comes through twice; I sent it yesterday from the wrong address and I don't think it went through. Benj ---------- Forwarded message ---------- Date: Nov 14, 2007 3:05 PM Subject: Logon Failure connecting to windows share over ppp vpn To: samba@lists.samba.org Hi, I'm using Samba 3.0.26a as a client to reach my a share over a vpn connection ppp0, eventually hoping to