similar to: [Bug 1806] New: SSH Client - Militant Identity File Permission Potentially Increases Security Risk

https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1806 Damien Miller <djm at mindrot.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|RESOLVED |CLOSED --- Comment #2 from Damien Miller <djm at mindrot.org> --- Set all RESOLVED bugs to CLOSED with release

On Fri, Jul 1, 2016 at 10:05 AM, Robinson, Paul <paul.robinson at sony.com> wrote: > I'm not sure why you're stuck on thinking I want an enumeration of > offenses. > Sorry, it's because i don't see a way to give you the below without it :) > What I'm looking for (and AFAICT also Rafael and maybe other people) is a > clearer statement that

On Fri, Jul 1, 2016 at 7:27 AM, Robinson, Paul <paul.robinson at sony.com> wrote: > | It's not sanely possible to enumerate all the possibilities > > Not looking for that. Looking to avoid being trolled. ("Trolled" isn't > the right word here but I've lost track of what the right one is. Hopefully > my intent is clear enough.) > I'm really not

The ice-* headers are the standard protocol for connecting to icecast2, the trouble is making all source clients adhere to the standard. The option is to be very militant about it, and basically deny any source clients that do not connect with the ice-* headers , but we chose the more compatable route...although there is a limit to this compatability....I would strongly urge darkice to use

I'm not sure where to put in my $.02 on this, but I think the best thing to do is pick a different name; I like "fresh". my $.02 of course, Mark

Hi all, I''m trying to get new tracker items to automatically send an email to this list, so I may run a couple of tests this week. You can ignore them. Heesob, can you please take a look at Bug 1806? I''m not sure if it''s possible or not, but it seems like a reasonable idea if it is. Regards, Dan __________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Plan great

yes this is darkice. perhaps we could work in 'icy-public' support...? --mark On Tuesday, Jul 8, 2003, at 19:58 US/Pacific, Arc wrote: > On Tue, Jul 08, 2003 at 03:40:42PM -0500, oddsock wrote: >> what source client is generating that ? > > I believe they run darkice, Mark Burdett would have to supply more > specific details as this is a relay of their lofi-mp3

hi everyone, do we get to encrypt lvm pools in/with libvirt? I'm on Centos 7.x but see mention of it, not even on the net. Or in other words - can guests(lxc I'm thinking of) run off ecrypted lvm where at least the part when dev gets luksOpened is taken care of by libvirt? many thanks, L.

My Samba Server had a wild time this weekend thanks to alleged power fluctuations. I'm using Samba 3.x on Fedora 4. My server sits on an APC UPS that remains in good health. When I arrived this Monday I found that my MicroTik Router was still up. My Win XP pro AV server was off and my Fedora/SAMBA box was also off. (all boxes have their own 15min UPS) The Win XP pro was brought up w/out

On Thu, Dec 20, 2018 at 04:57:41PM -0500, John Ferlan wrote: > > > On 12/20/18 11:56 AM, lejeczek wrote: > > hi everyone, > > > > do we get to encrypt lvm pools in/with libvirt? > > The pool or the volumes? > > > > > I'm on Centos 7.x but see mention of it, not even on the net. > > I have no idea which libvirt version is in Centos

On 12/20/18 11:56 AM, lejeczek wrote: > hi everyone, > > do we get to encrypt lvm pools in/with libvirt? The pool or the volumes? > > I'm on Centos 7.x but see mention of it, not even on the net. I have no idea which libvirt version is in Centos versions, but support was added in libvirt 3.9.0 (Nov. 2017) via commit 2518fd3b6a with a followup commit 9b837963 for libvirt

Dear all, I think that there is a bug in the function simulate.lm() when called upon a glm fitted with gaussian family with a link other than identity. The variance of the simulated response is clearly off and an inspection to the code of simulate.lm reveals that it is because the variance is divided by the model weights (precisely, not the prior ones), which is not documented. Can somebody file

Am 08.04.2017 um 10:00 schrieb Stephan Bosch: > > However, I now remember I tested this in the past and there was one > snag. The effect of this is that the message is stored twice in the Sent > mailbox: > > - The first is the original message. Since it was discarded, it has the > \Deleted flag set and it will disappear at the next EXPUNGE > - The encrypted message stored

I''ve written a pretty nice Flickr style in place text edit JavaScript control based on the Script.aculo.us library. API is like this: <span id="editme">Edit me!</span> <script> new InPlaceEditor($(''editme''), ''url/to/action''); </script> Background changes to gray as mouse hovers over the text (like flickr) and the

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On Thu, 17 Jul 2014, Ricardo Branco wrote: > Also just to note that Postfix is not the problem here, that has now been > ruled out I compiled to current hg version of Dovecot: changeset: 17627:fd0616d553b0 tag: tip user: Timo Sirainen <tss at iki.fi> date: Fri Jul 11 16:49:35 2014 +0300 summary:

Hi, I want to do plain auth against my password file. However it has been difficult to find a proper docs and all i have found reuqieres recompiling or patching. I am not interested in ecrypted communication with a certificate. Just plain auth. My mailserver should allow some users that will be traveling to send mail using our server and we don't know what IP address they will have. thanks,

Hi, Here is my problem: I set up Samba v2.2.8a on a linux host (RedHat Linux 8.0) for my workgroup. My other hosts in the workgroup are Windows 2000 and Windows XP hosts and a 3COM firewall. All directories that are not "protected" can be accessed by all users. The workgroup uses encrypted passwords (using non ecrypted passwords does not solve the problem). Samba is configured to

Folks, David has been particularly militant with broken buildbots recently, so to make sure we don't throw the baby with the bath water, I'd like to propose some changes on how we deal with the emails on our *current* buildmaster, since there's no concrete plans to move it to anything else at the moment. The main issue is that managing the buildbots is not a simple task. It requires

Hi, I downloaded the source code of opus-1.1.3.tar.gz, and statically analyzed the code by a static analysis tool. Many potential false alarms are reported. I checked manually and selected a potential error which is described as follow. Could you please check it? In file ‘src/opus_encoder.c’, function ‘opus_encode_native’, the piece of code is: … Line 1802: if (frame_size == 2*st->Fs/25)

CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2013:1806 Important Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2013-1806.html The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename ) i386: 87ec89961597a407e567c6bf4eea0d802b37fab2e0907782d0d7eb409f949a04 libsmbclient-3.6.9-167.el6_5.i686.rpm