similar to: tinydns -some help needed

Hello listmates, Somehow or other my DNS services that are part of the ndjbdns-1.06-1.el7.x86_64 package would not start properly at startup. When I then start them up using systemctl: systemctl start dnscache systemctl start tinydns they start just fine. >From the log I got the following for tinydns: Oct 24 15:01:43 ns99 tinydns[1867]: tinydns: version 1.06: starting: Oct-24 2014 15:01:43

Hi all, tinydns starts up fine, selinux reports no issues (now after a day of clearing errors). If I turn selinux back to permissive in /etc/sysconfig/selinux, and reboot, tinydns responds to queries. If I turn selinux back to enforcing and reboot, tinydns does not respond. Monitoring /var/log/messages shows no errors from iptables/shorewall or selinux. The only way I can find an error is

I'm workign to setup Samba4 and my current centos server deployment uses TinyDNS/DNSCache for the DNS. Understanding that it is best to use Sambas internal DNS for AD, I'm wondering how others are doing DNS? I really don't want to use BIND. Should my DHCP server send ddns updates to Samba's internal DNS for client leases? Thanks, -- Greg J. Zartman Board Member Koozali

Hello all, We have put a DNS server online running DJBDNS v1.06 (ndjbdns-1.06-1.el6.x86_64) on a 64-bit CentOS 6.6 server. We have done some limited testing on the machine which it passed - i.e., dnscache was talking to tinydns, the queries went through fine, etc. As soon as we put it online subjecting it to live load the following happened: 1) Within a short time period (about a minute) the

On 07/05/2019 01:43 PM, Rowland penny via samba wrote: > On 05/07/2019 18:59, Robert A Wooldridge via samba wrote: >> Is it necessary to use Samba's DNS when configuring as a domain >> controller?? Can a DNS server be used on a different machine? >> > The dns server must be authoritative for the AD dns domain but you do > not need to use the Samba internal dns

Lucian, So far here is the best we could find out: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1084747 Testing to see if this is the solution; so far it seems to be. Cheers, Boris. On Tue, Jan 13, 2015 at 2:49 PM, Nux! <nux at li.nux.ro> wrote: > Use BIND. How the times have changed. :-) > > PS: I'm also curious for a solution.. for when djbnostalgia hits me. > >

I have used tinydns for many many years now and it has always worked very well. I like its simplicity: 1 text file is converted into a cdb database, there's no master/slave environment (all nameservers are equal) and synchronisation is done by rsync. Tinydns is run by runit, a supervise system. I'm looking at NSD now and I think I can use NSD the same way I use tinydns. The only

Good morning: We're about to start moving our public DNS to in-house managed servers. My first thought was "Linux + BIND" and we're done. Someone in another business unit's IT dept. has suggested tinydns be used. >From what I could find, it looks like this software hasn't really had any community drive behind it in a while. The latest RPMs on rpmforge are for red hat

On 07/05/2019 02:11 PM, Rowland penny via samba wrote: > On 05/07/2019 20:03, Robert A Wooldridge via samba wrote: >> On 07/05/2019 01:55 PM, Rowland penny via samba wrote: >>> I currently run tinydns and dnscache on my proxy machine.? I was >>> hoping to keep that going.? I have a Windows Server2004 doing DC >>> work right now.? Need to update that.

Hi there, I've been a happy djbdns+tinydns user for many, many years. I want to keep using it, so answers of the form "bletch! Use ISC BIND the way BSD intended" will be ignored :-) Having said that, one annoying consequence of my transition some time ago to using ntpd, rather than just setting the clock once-off with ntpdate as I used to, is that the /etc/rc.d mechanism starts

List: Sorry for posting to this list but could not find step by step instructions anywhere nor get any concerned list to respond. Newbie to DNS technicals but can work with instructions if given in ./configure for complete idiots ;-) 1. I have taken a static IP from my ISP 203.134.221.162 and the ISP has put up an entry in APNIC whois (please check the same)...to me it seems incomplete, as it

Use BIND. How the times have changed. :-) PS: I'm also curious for a solution.. for when djbnostalgia hits me. Lucian -- Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology! Nux! www.nux.ro ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Boris Epstein" <borepstein at gmail.com> > To: "CentOS mailing list" <centos at centos.org> > Sent: Tuesday, 13 January,

Thanks for getting back with the "solution". You might want to give that bugzilla entry a jolt, it's been stagnating since last year. :-) Lucian -- Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology! Nux! www.nux.ro ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Boris Epstein" <borepstein at gmail.com> > To: "CentOS mailing list" <centos at

I am having two problems, possibly related, while performing pre-deployment testing of a Samba/OpenLDAP PDC with data that was vampired from an NT4 PDC. The Samba server fails to become a local master browser, and password change attempts (from a Windows client) fail. I followed Samba-Guide/ntmigration.html (taking some liberties with various items of configuration), ending with step #19.

On Sun, Oct 26, 2014 at 11:37 PM, Greg Zartman <gzartman at koozali.org> wrote: > I'm workign to setup Samba4 and my current centos server deployment uses > TinyDNS/DNSCache for the DNS. Understanding that it is best to use Sambas > internal DNS for AD, I'm wondering how others are doing DNS? I really > don't want to use BIND. > > Should my DHCP server send

Hi I've got rsync setup to replicate DNS for an irc network I help run. I'm the primary DNS, so I use the rsync client to connect to a friend running another DNS server, and he has the rsync daemon setup. the conf is as follows log file = /root/rsync.log [tinydns] path = /etc/tinydns/root/ use chroot = no max connections = 2 read only = false list = false uid = root

Hello Wouter, We used tinydns for many years. After migration to nsd3 we miss only one feature present in tinydns only: tinydns may switch addresses by decreasing the ttl for old data and serve new data starting from a fixed timestamp. http://cr.yp.to/djbdns/tinydns-data.html: You may include a timestamp on each line. If ttl is nonzero (or omitted), the timestamp is a starting time for the

On 07/05/2019 01:55 PM, Rowland penny via samba wrote: > I currently run tinydns and dnscache on my proxy machine.? I was > hoping to keep that going.? I have a Windows Server2004 doing DC work > right now.? Need to update that. >> >> -- >> Bob Wooldridge >> > You can run a caching nameserver that forwards your AD dns zones to > your AD DC, but you can

> Sorry - I once was sold on the idea of djb's tools and Qmail, and I've > regretted installing it ever since. Save yourself some serious agony - run > (don't walk!) away from djb-ANYTHING! I don't know what problems you had with it, but I'm hapilly using it on about 20 servers (both djbdns and qmail) and never had a problem with it. I'll remember your advice

Hi, I have a FreeBSD 4.8 box connected to the net which until recently hasn't had any problems. Today DNS lookups mysteriously stopped working (the box has tinydns & dnscache installed to handle dns requests). I noticed some strange things while checking the problem with tcpdump. Tcpdump appears not to show any traffic whatsoever on either my external interface or internal lan interface,