similar to: [Bug 1118] Annoying "Killed by signal 1" message with ProxyCommand

http://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1118 Summary: Annoying "Killed by signal 1" message with ProxyCommand Product: Portable OpenSSH Version: 4.2p1 Platform: Other OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: ssh AssignedTo: bitbucket at mindrot.org

http://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1118 djm at mindrot.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution| |WONTFIX ------- Comment #2 from djm at mindrot.org 2006-03-12 15:50 -------

On Fri, Jun 04, 2004 at 01:20:54PM -0400, Joey Hess wrote: > My colocated server was refusing both ssh and ssl telnet connections. > It looked like this: > > joey:~>ssh -v kite > OpenSSH_3.8.1p1 Debian 1:3.8.1p1-4, OpenSSL 0.9.7d 17 Mar 2004 > debug1: Reading configuration data /home/joey/.ssh/config > debug1: Applying options for kite > debug1: Reading configuration

Hello, While testing recent snapshots (20131023 and 20131024) I encountered a problem with ProxyCommand. The regression tests all passed, but the use of ProxyCommand's in my ~/.ssh/config resulted in name resolution errors; even if CanonicalizeHostname was explicitly set to "no." The patch included inline below fixed the issue: Index: ssh.c

hello hpa, current chroot util stands out as broken and found an old nfsmount commit on a stray testbox in our institue. thanks for taking a look! maks git pull git://git.debian.org/~maks/klibc.git maks for the changes: maximilian attems (4): [klibc] malloc fix compile with DEBUG_MALLOC [klibc] README: add klibc email [klibc] nfsmount: improve error message [klibc]

On Tue, Apr 02, 2024 at 01:30:11AM +0100, Colin Watson wrote: > * for Debian trixie (current testing): > > * add dependency-only packages called something like > openssh-client-gsskex and openssh-server-gsskex, depending on their > non-gsskex alternatives > * add NEWS.Debian entry saying that people need to install these > packages if they want to retain

On Sun, Apr 15, 2018 at 06:38:37PM +1000, Damien Miller wrote: > On Sat, 14 Apr 2018, Colin Watson wrote: > > This isn't an OpenSSH bug, but just in case anyone else is ambitious > > enough to automatically run interoperability tests against other SSH > > implementations, here's a heads-up: > > > > https://twistedmatrix.com/trac/ticket/9422 > >

This isn't an OpenSSH bug, but just in case anyone else is ambitious enough to automatically run interoperability tests against other SSH implementations, here's a heads-up: https://twistedmatrix.com/trac/ticket/9422 TL;DR: commit 7c856857607112a3dfe6414696bf4c7ab7fb0cb3 caused there to be an SSH_MSG_DEBUG message sent where there wasn't one before, which tripped over an

ext4 no longer requires a journal. Compare: http://git.kernel.org/?p=fs/ext2/e2fsprogs.git;a=commitdiff;h=a90f5391dda78f7bc4a8196a78355584ace0adf5 Signed-off-by: Colin Watson <cjwatson at ubuntu.com> --- usr/kinit/fstype/fstype.c | 8 -------- 1 files changed, 0 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-) diff --git a/usr/kinit/fstype/fstype.c b/usr/kinit/fstype/fstype.c index 69e0e30..bf63b1b

If the file size wasn't a multiple of 64KB, we could overwrite the next entry in the malloc arena so reading the initramfs would fail. Signed-off-by: Colin Watson <cjwatson at ubuntu.com> --- com32/gfxboot/gfxboot.c | 3 ++- 1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-) diff --git a/com32/gfxboot/gfxboot.c b/com32/gfxboot/gfxboot.c index dd4d641..0fbfadd 100644 ---

Hi, https://www.openssh.com/specs.html says that RFC8308 support was added in OpenSSH 7.2, and it specifically calls out both ext-info-s and ext-info-c: "Extension Negotiation in the Secure Shell (SSH) Protocol (ext-info-s, ext-info-c)". However, while ext-info-c was indeed added in 7.2 as part of server-sig-algs support

fix subject and added warning to patch mail, thanks for review. ----- Forwarded message from "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa at zytor.com> ----- Date: Mon, 29 Mar 2010 15:07:01 -0700 From: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa at zytor.com> To: maximilian attems <max at stro.at> Cc: Colin Watson <cjwatson at ubuntu.com>, klibc at zytor.com, Herbert Xu <herbert at

# For linux-cifs-client: this paragraph is for the Debian bug tracking # system control robot. Please ignore it. reassign 447153 linux-2.6 thanks On Fri, Oct 19, 2007 at 12:03:01AM +0200, Michal Suchanek wrote: > On 18/10/2007, Colin Watson <cjwatson at debian.org> wrote: > > On Thu, Oct 18, 2007 at 03:32:27PM +0200, Hramrach wrote: > > > When copying to a cifs share scp

On Sun, Sep 20, 2020 at 09:34:50AM -0700, Kevin Brott wrote: > On 9/19/20 11:02 PM, Damien Miller wrote: > > OpenSSH 8.4p1 is almost ready for release, so we would appreciate testing > > on as many platforms and systems as possible. This is a bugfix release. > > Debian GNU/Linux 10 (buster) > gcc version 8.3.0 (Debian 8.3.0-6) > OpenSSL 1.1.1d? 10 Sep 2019 > >

On Sun, Oct 21, 2018 at 07:30:44PM +0200, Gert Doering wrote: > On Sun, Oct 21, 2018 at 10:21:56AM -0700, Parke wrote: > > On Sun, Oct 21, 2018 at 3:32 AM Timo Kilpilehto <timo at kilpilehto.fi> wrote: > > > eval sh -c "echo none of this makes any difference" > > > > Where is it documented that ssh is going to eval my command? The fact > >

I do think it's a problem that, as far as I can see, the exact behaviour of ssh command interpretation isn't explained anywhere in its man pages, even though it seems like the only possibility if you understand the protocol. ssh(1) just says "If command is specified, it is executed on the remote host instead of a login shell", but that doesn't provide any hint about what

https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=626 Colin Watson <cjwatson at debian.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |cjwatson at debian.org --- Comment #3 from Colin Watson <cjwatson at debian.org> --- Isn't this fixed in

https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1256 Colin Watson <cjwatson at debian.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |cjwatson at debian.org --- Comment #7 from Colin Watson <cjwatson at debian.org> --- It looks as though

https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1008 Colin Watson <cjwatson at debian.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |cjwatson at debian.org --- Comment #15 from Colin Watson <cjwatson at debian.org> --- I think it would make

Ubuntu CDs use multiple configuration files and the include directive as well as gfxboot, so it's useful for gfxboot to support these. Signed-off-by: Colin Watson <cjwatson at ubuntu.com> --- com32/gfxboot/gfxboot.c | 65 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---------------- 1 files changed, 43 insertions(+), 22 deletions(-) diff --git a/com32/gfxboot/gfxboot.c b/com32/gfxboot/gfxboot.c