similar to: Using Centos

G'Day All; So I purchased a Cisco 7960 and am now trying to get it configured for *. No can do without the variuos files/images through a FTPF server. I configured the TFTP server on my RHES 3 box, now to get the required CISCO files. So I contacted CISCO to purchase the required maintenance contract so as to gain access to the download area for the files/images. -WHAT A FRUSTRATION!!-

Hi all, Just curious, Quite a while a go, i was checking for supported SW-platform. AFAIR, it was RHES and SLES Now it's only RHES-4 and FC-3 or FC-4. Not a single syllable about CentOS or SLES-9 or SLES-10 It probably just runs fine, but any chance of getting support for their *-enterprise version? (just in case of, if one needs it) Hans -- pgp-id: 926EBB12 pgp-fingerprint: BE97 1CBF

I'm having problems with ADS membership for samba. I had a "mostly" working version with RHES v2.1, krb5 v1.2, samba v3.0.5. I knew to get to a fully functioning version I would need krb5 v1.3 or later. So finally I had an opertunity to junk RH's crufty krb5 and build from scratch with: RHES v2.1 MIT krb5 v1.4 samba v3.0.13 This works fine on another server. Now to the

Hi This is not a RHEL list but i am sure someone here knows the answer :) I downloaded the wrong ISO's from RH and installed RHAS when i really wanted RHES - I know there is little (no) difference between the 2 but what do i need to do to 'convert' a RHAS box to RHEL ? thanks

Apologies for the cross-posting to CentOS list (already mailed to OpenVPNlist).. am using OpenVPN [ http://openvpn.sf.net ] on CentOS 3.4 and having some issues.. it may possibly be an OpenVPN issue, but thought if anyone on this list is using or had any similar issues or have any thoughts.. TIA ---------- Forwarded message ---------- Date: Wed, 12 Jan 2005 11:26:22 -0700 Subject: resend with

Greetings. I am planning on getting my RHCE in the near future. I thinking I should wait until 6 comes out before proceeding. That being said, I don't want to wait past the end of this year. That being said, do you all have any information about how long it takes for their training platform to catch up to their release? Which is to say, if RHES 6 is released on day 1, at what point

Thanks everyone for your feedback, especially Mark. I now have the ALL the files I need. My order still stands for the $8.00 product from CISCO but the CP7960 dealer sent me all the files. Now I will move on to completeing the setup of the TFTP server. Thanks again -----Original Message----- From: Michael Loftis [mailto:mloftis@wgops.com] Sent: Friday, February 18, 2005 7:51 PM To:

Just set up postfix & it's running on my RHES 4.2 box. Immediately after postfix is up, I test sending emails from a permitted domain (ahhh, on this postfix server's domain firewall, we even have a firewall rule which permits Tcp25 from those few sending domains' SMTP servers) using an email client to sender_id@[IP_address_of_the_postfix_server] & the /var/log/maillog on

Hello several months ago I install WhiteBox Linux on several severs, I was happy, not woriing about upgrading every 1,5 year as when I use RH 4.0, 6.0, 7.3, 9.0 .... And then WhiteBox went black, WBEL updates release slowed down and maintainer wont help form anybody. Just telling "If you want quick updates, build it yourself.". I prefer wasting time for customizations and/or

I am running samba 3.0.22 on RHES 3.0 and I currently have slapd.conf configured to use "include /etc/openldap/schema/samba.schema" do I need to change the schema to samba3.schema? Why I ask this I have bought Samba 3 by example and the example for Suse Linuxhas use the samba3.schema. Logical I would think I would want to do this. Should I update the slapd.conf to include

Hello, I am facing some serious issues on customer's site. I looked around on the web and in the archives but didn't find anything. I hope you can help me. Here is my configuration : OS :RHES 4.7 NUT : 2.2.0 NUT-CLIENT : 2.2.0 Hardware : IBM x3250M2 (dual-core intel E3110) Here are the symptoms : After some time, the performance of my applications on this server began to drop with

Hi, For a few months i've been using WhiteBox Enterprise Linux. In fact, i've migrated all my companie's servers (about 20) to this RHEL distro like. Well, it's not that i'm not satisfied, but WBEL is a one man show and that causes me some preocupation. And besides, it seems to me that it can't stand up to the rythm RHEL evolves. That's why i'm writing to you,

Hello, I am usin Samba 3.0.2 on RHES 3.0 with w2k Clients. When i make the [homes] service available the clients can access the directory. But die directory will not be mapped on the Winows clients. When i comment it out the service in smb.conf, it is not available BUT in the log file i see "cannot connect to service "user". I think this is not good for performance. I have

I'm on RHES 4.x I downloaded 2 dovecot RPM packages from http://packages.sw.be/dovecot/ dovecot-1.0.13-1.el4.rfx.i386.rpm 13-Nov-2010 22:15 1.8M RHEL4 and CentOS-4 x86 32bit and dovecot-0.99.13-1.2.el4.test.i386.rpm 21-Feb-2005 16:57 693K RHEL4 and CentOS-4 x86 32bit The first rpm fails with error below : # rpm -i ./dovecot-1.0.13-1.el4.rfx.i386.rpm warning:

List, It looks like I may have to drop back to a 32-bit version of the OS due to some non-resolvable library issues for the software I'm attempting to compile, and want to ask, how far back can I go with CentOS where I'd not lose too much functionality of the 4.1 version. Essentially what I need is the equivalent of RHES 3. The other thing I'd thought about would be to

Hi everyone! rsync 2.5.7 linux RHES v3 We need to sync over 4 Million files, and when we run rsync we run out of memory! :( We were going to batch things, but the build in Batch mode still will use a large amount of memory. Any manualy batching is proving to be harder than you'd think, even with --include and --exclude flags. The flags actually make it still have to recurse the whole

Thanks for the reply. I had already visited the links mentioned by you. The link? https://www.centos.org/legal/trademarks/ talks about non-usage of trademarks in commercial software which is taken care. The link https://www.centos.org/legal/ talks very less about legal terms and condition. Is there some other link which mentions about the License model used by CentOS. Infact, no where it is

Hello all, I am having some serious problems getting winbind to recognize secondary group memberships. I have a samba server version samba-3.0.0-14.3E running on RHES v.3. This is running on a 2x Xeon 2.4 Ghz IBM Server with 2G Ram. nscd is not running. See below for smb.conf. cat /proc/version: Linux version 2.4.21-9.ELsmp (bhcompile@stripples.devel.redhat.com) (gcc version 3.2.3 20030502

My config looks as follows: ------------------------------------------ # Default boot option to use DEFAULT vesamenu.c32 # Prompt user for selection PROMPT 0 # Time until default is selected TIMEOUT 100 # Menu Configuration MENU WIDTH 80 MENU MARGIN 10 MENU PASSWORDMARGIN 3 MENU ROWS 12 MENU TABMSGROW 18 MENU CMDLINEROW 18 MENU ENDROW 24 MENU PASSWORDROW 11 MENU TIMEOUTROW 20 MENU TITLE 32Bit

Well, I'm a recent convert from WBEL. My biggest concern with CentOS is that the community here seems to want to be more than a recompile of RHEL. But WBEL is floundering, what with Katrina and Rita, and there really being only 1 developer behind it, etc. I offer an automated shell script to switch from WBEL4 to CentOS4 (easy, it's hosted on my home DSL line!) It assumes that