similar to: Using fedora's kernel on centos

Hi How do I make an initrd for xen. I''m trying to boot rhel3 in fc4, and it keeps getting stuck at Freeing unused kernel memory. I''ve created the device files, but it still doesn''t boot up. I''m pretty sure that the solution lies in makeing an initrd file. Currently my xenU kernel is 2.6.11-1.1369_FC4xen0. Can someone please tell me how to do this? Many

Hello all. First of all, please be a bit indulgent to my poor English :-). Second, this message is "kinda" BIG, so if you don''t like BIG messages, simply don''t read it :-). I''ve read http://shorewall.net/2.0/Shorewall_and_Routing.html and http://shorewall.net/MultiISP.html, however I still a bit confused how to organize what I need :-). I''ve a

Hi.... I''m trying to setup a LAN router with P2P filter but the problem is that can''t "catch" Ares. There is a way to DROP "ares" p2p packets ? I''ve tried with last "ipp2p" snapshot without sucess... I''ve Kernel 2.4.28 iptables 1.3.0 Various Patches from patch-o-matic-ng-20040621 iproute2-ss020116 IMQ Patch Esfq Patch

Hello everybody. i have the folowing problem: i have this in the top of PREROUTING chain in mangle table iptables -t mangle -A PREROUTING -j CONNMARK --set-mark 0 # rule 1 iptables -t mangle -A PREROUTING -m connmark --mark 5 # rule 2 iptables -t mangle -A PREROUTING -m connmark --mark 6 # rule 3 i think when packet is passing trough my POSTROUTING in mangle table

I saw this snippet from Daniel Chemko dchemko@smgtec.com Mon, 31 May 2004 09:30:43 -0700 # Egress marking (mostly for QOS operations) iptables -t mangle -A POSTROUTING -j CONNMARK --restore-mark iptables -t mangle -A POSTROUTING -m mark ! --mark 0 -j ACCEPT iptables -t mangle -A POSTROUTING -o ${if_inet} --dport 21 -j MARK --set-mark 0x111 iptables -t mangle -A POSTROUTING -j CONNMARK

Hey, one more question for ipp2p iptables -t mangle -A DSL-IN -p tcp -m ipp2p --ipp2p -j CONNMARK --restore-mark iptables -t mangle -A DSL-IN -p tcp -m mark ! --mark 0 -j ACCEPT iptables -t mangle -A DSL-IN -p tcp -m ipp2p --ipp2p -j MARK --set-mark 7 iptables -t mangle -A DSL-IN -p tcp -m ipp2p --ipp2p -j CONNMARK --save-mark iptables -t mangle -A DSL-IN -p udp -m ipp2p --ipp2p -j MARK

I am trying to get IPP2P working on my router. Thus far I can see connections being marked (see below), but they don''t seem to get saved or something. When looking at /proc/net/ip_conntrack, nothing has anything other than 0 for mark. The iptables commands for this are: iptables -t mangle -A PREROUTING -j CONNMARK --restore-mark iptables -t mangle -A PREROUTING -m mark ! --mark 0 -j

Hi Can anyone show me how to make a new initrd for a newly rolled kernel? I have to install a 'custom' 2.6.14 kernel and i have build the kernel and now just trying to build the initrd cd /boot mkinitrd initrd-2.6.14.img 2.6.14 No module mptbase found for kernel 2.6.14, aborting. What am i doing wrong? thanks

Hi, I''ve been implementing a load balancing solution using CONNMARK, based on solution described by Luciano Ruete at [1]. Gracias por el post y por apuntar en la dirección correcta Luciano! Once implemented, I''ve found that due to some reason packets aren''t properly marked (or improperly remarked) and sent out using the wrong interface. My topo setup is:

Hey all, Just thought I'd give a quick shout out across the mailing list that it looks like Extlinux support got merged into Fedora's mkinitrd, which I believe is in time for Fedora 11. This apparently isn't my full patch series (which if anyone cares can be found at: http://git.kernel.org/?p=boot/warthog9/mkinitrd-syslinux.git;a=summary ) since it's missing the Extlinux

Hi, I'm using IPSEC in a multi-ISP configuration, lsm 0.131, Kernel 2.6.32, ipsec-tools 0.8.0 This worked fine with Shorewall/Shorewall-Lite 4.5.7. After updating Shorewall to 4.5.8 the routing of ESP packets doesn't work. If I change the Providers.pm file and add connmark => "! --mark 0/$mask" like before in Shorewall 4.5.7 than everything works fine. add_ijump

Hi there, i have some questions regarding CONNMARK and STRING modules for netfilter. I have a stateful firewall doing contraking, because i have two dsl connections doing load balancing. I have found a way to discriminate KaZaA traffic flowing via port 80 from normal HTTP traffic using the string match. I want to mark a kazaa connection and filter ir to a specific qdisc. I have been looking

Hi to all. I recently upgraded to shorewall ver 2.3 from 2.0 after fixin some minor config problems, I also upgraded iptables from 1.2 to 1.3 (rpm-based install) but when I tried to start shorewall it terminates and I noticed it''s giving me this error iptables: No chain/target/match by that name ERROR: Command "/sbin/iptables -t mangle -A PREROUTING -m connmark ! --mark 0 -j

Hi, as per the shorewall MultiISP documentation ( http://www1.shorewall.net/MultiISP.html ), it says "Use of this feature requires that your kernel and iptables include CONNMARK target and connmark match support (Warning: Standard Debian™ and Ubuntu™ kernels are lacking that support!)." it means MultiISP wont work properly if i am using Ubuntu server. if yes whats the

Hi, I have a suspicious problem with multiple uplinks configuration. First of all my configuration: 1) kernel 2.6.20.3 2) iptables 1.3.7 3) last iproute (for masked marks) All wan interfaces are bridged (stp disabled) in only one interface (wan0), all lan interfaces are bridged (stp enabled) in only one interface (zlan0). The wan0 bridge is to allow UPnP works. To allow related

Hi, this might be a dumb question, but I''m not finding much information online. I''m trying to setup a 2.6 linux box to run nat across multiple upstream links as a simple way to aggregate bandwidth. I found the instructions in lartc section 4.2 (http://lartc.org/howto/lartc.rpdb.multiple-links.html) fairly clear and straightforward. I implemented those, and a couple of trivial

Hi to all. I recently upgraded to shorewall ver 2.3 from 2.0 so I could explore the multiple ISP/dual default route setup feature of version 2.3, I also upgraded iptables from 1.2 to 1.3 (rpm-based install) but when I tried to start shorewall it terminates and I noticed it''s giving me this error iptables: No chain/target/match by that name ERROR: Command "/sbin/iptables -t mangle -A

I''m struggling to get Xen to boot on a FC4 Opteron box. I''ve included the tail of the boot log below [1]. I suspect that the problems relates to the software RAID 1 root and boot partitions, and how it relates to the initrd image. The RAID volumes fail to mount. I compiled the Xen snapshot from the 23rd September, and the only change I''ve made is to enable the

https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1128 Bug ID: 1128 Summary: ip6_tables connmark or connlabel never matches Product: netfilter/iptables Version: unspecified Hardware: x86_64 OS: SuSE Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 Component: ip6_tables (kernel)

Hi I''m running Xen on Fedora core 3... uname -a Linux groucho 2.6.10-1.1148_FC4xen0 #1 SMP Sat Feb 19 15:15:24 EST 2005 i686 i686 i386 GNU/Linux # xm list Name Id Mem(MB) CPU State Time(s) Console Domain-0 0 121 0 r---- 140.9 What I''m trying to do is get SuSE 9.2 to come up in it''s own domain.. /dev/hda2 = root for FC-3