similar to: [Bug 1606] New: internal-sftp does not drop conections properly, it will hang

The previous version broke the case of internal-sftp without arguments. This is a fixed version. --- /var/tmp/session.c 2008-08-18 21:07:10.000000000 -0700 +++ session.c 2008-08-19 11:28:29.000000000 -0700 @@ -781,7 +781,7 @@ if (options.adm_forced_command) { original_command = command; command = options.adm_forced_command; - if

Hi, This patch makes things like ForceCommand internal-sftp -l INFO work (current code in 5.1 would just end the session). Please consider for inclusion into mainline. Michael. --- /var/tmp/session.c 2008-08-18 21:07:10.000000000 -0700 +++ session.c 2008-08-18 21:12:51.000000000 -0700 @@ -781,7 +781,7 @@ if (options.adm_forced_command) { original_command = command;

https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1599 Summary: "ForceCommand internal-sftp" not working as expected Product: Portable OpenSSH Version: 5.2p1 Platform: ix86 OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: sshd AssignedTo: unassigned-bugs at mindrot.org

Hello everybody, I'm a C/C++ consultant working for Ericsson. I changed the OpenSSH-Portable code to add a new criteria into the Match sshd_config option read by the sshd server. The new criteria is "Subsystem"; so a conditional block based on subsystem client request can now be added to the sshd_config configuration server file to override settings in its global section.

> > On Mar 22, 2008, at 3:32 PM, Chris Wilson wrote: > > > >> As I understand the "ForceCommand" in the sshd_confing file is meant to > >> ignore any command supplied by the client, but if user's home is shared > >> by server and client machines over network (ex. NFS) then user can > >> still put something else into ~/.ssh/rc file and

I've configured OpenSSH_5.3p1 to only allow sftp connections (openssh chroot functionality). i.e. Subsystem sftp internal-sftp Match group sftpusers ChrootDirectory /chroot/%u X11Forwarding no AllowTcpForwarding no ForceCommand internal-sftp So far everything works correctly with sftp but when a user ssh's or scp's to the box the login

Hi everybody, Someone know how can i work with a mysql db that does''nt have persistent conections? thanks -- _________ Noel R. Morais

Hi; I have a CentOS 6.8 x86_64 server where just run Oracle 11g 64 bit data base server. Is happen that sometimes it loose all connections (no ping, I can not access via ssh, no TNSping of Oracle server have success). When this happend I make ping from this server to some IP address of my network and then everything work fine again. I check logs looking for some mistake or problem in the network

On 23/02/17 08:27, Rommel Rodriguez Toirac wrote: > The solution was another IP address to this network device and then > everything work fine. > Why this happend? How I can erase the link beteewn MAC 00:1D:09:FF:44:4B and IP 192.168.41.4? Where can be stored this link? > Right now in the network is not assignet the IP address 192.168.41.4 to no one device (printserver, switch,

On Feb 20, 2017 2:42 PM, "Rommel Rodriguez Toirac" <rommelrt at nauta.cu> wrote: Hi; I have a CentOS 6.8 x86_64 server where just run Oracle 11g 64 bit data base server. Is happen that sometimes it loose all connections (no ping, I can not access via ssh, no TNSping of Oracle server have success). When this happend I make ping from this server to some IP address of my network and

https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1527 Summary: ForceCommand internal-sftp needs a way to enable logging Product: Portable OpenSSH Version: 5.1p1 Platform: Itanium2 OS/Version: HP-UX Status: NEW Severity: minor Priority: P4 Component: sftp-server AssignedTo:

Hello, I am trying to force a command for all users *except* for users in the "wheel" group. My idea was to do the following in sshd_config: ForceCommand /usr/bin/validate-ssh-command Match Group wheel ForceCommand But obviously this doesn't work, because ForceCommand requires an argument. I couldn't find a way to achieve what I want. I wrote a patch that adds a

On 12/03/2014 01:37:58 PM, Kevin Korb wrote: > As far as a backup provider goes I wouldn't expect them to use rsync > over SSL unless that were built into rsync in the future (and has > been > around long enough that most users would have it). > > I would expect them to either use rsync over ssh secured by rrsync or > rsyncd over ssh with them managing the rsyncd.conf

We are having problems with SSH shells disconnecting. We are replacing a older version of SSH (Non-Comercial Version which some one installed in error, but it was working fine.) & Had been running OpenSSH 2.3.0p? which had similar problems, some of the errors I was seeing went away with OpenSSH 2.5.2.p1. compiled against openssl-0.9.6, with SUNWspro & GCC281 on Solaris 2.8 & Solaris

El 21 de febrero de 2017 7:00:03 GMT-05:00, centos-request at centos.org escribi?: >Send CentOS mailing list submissions to > centos at centos.org > > >From: Kahlil Hodgson <kahlil.hodgson at dp.exchange> >To: CentOS mailing list <centos at centos.org> >Subject: Re: [CentOS] Network conections problems > >First guess is that you may have two devices on the

https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2281 Bug ID: 2281 Summary: sshd accepts empty arguments in ForceCommand and VersionAddendum Product: Portable OpenSSH Version: 6.6p1 Hardware: Other OS: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 Component: sshd

Hi guys, I have a server setup with openssh-5.0p1 and use some users as sftp-only chroot accounts. The following configuration yields exactly the result I want: user is chrooted, logs to syslog, all is good. #================================================# Subsystem sftp internal-sftp -f AUTHPRIV -l VERBOSE Match User fredwww ChrootDirectory %h #ForceCommand internal-sftp

Hello List. ? i?m trying to setup a limited SSH server with SFTP. The requirements: -????????? There are users to whom only SFTP should be available. (sftp-only group) -????????? There are users to whom SFTP and shell access should be available (admin group) -????????? SFTP clients have to authenticate with username and password -????????? shell users have to authenticate with private key.

On Sat, 11 Nov 2023, Bob Proulx wrote: > I am supporting a site that allows members to upload release files. I > have inherited this site which was previously existing. The goal is > to allow members to file transfer to and from their project area for > release distribution but not to allow general shell access and not to > allow access to other parts of the system. > >