similar to: stub actions that depend on the parameter

hi, I have installed ruby and rails under windows(exactly this one: http://rubyforge.org/frs/download.php/4174/ruby182-15.exe that includes rubygems) the thing is that while trying to install the mysql gem, it seemd to try to build the native extension, so I finally added a compiled version that I found in http://dema.ruby.com.br/ the problem is that webrick behaves quite unstable while

Hello, I did a fresh install of ruby182 and gem rails --include-dependencies Now when I do: rails receipts cd receipts ruby script\generate scaffold receipt receipt rails does not create the views or controller. What can I do? Thanks Frank

Same as its brothers/sisters, it's optimized for 4 KB blocks. /* * OCZ Vertex 4 SSDs * 4k optimized */ { T_DIRECT, SIP_MEDIA_FIXED, "ATA", "OCZ_VERTEX4*", "*"}, /*quirks/DA_Q_4K Borja.

Hi, I would like to configure a Xen private network where the guests use private addresses. So far I have setup the Dom0 instances and the vm''s can access to the other guests inside the same server. Now my question is how can the guests reach the other guests that are located in other physical servers. Here is a diagram of how the network looks:

Hi How can I specify that a private method of a class gets called? If you run the code below, only spec (1) passes. Spec (2) is what I found causing problems in my code, and class (3) is my failed attempt to work around it. (3 really puzzles me - why is a private class method not accessible via send?) Another problem is that stub! makes public methods, which changes the behaviour of

I''m wondering what''s the difference between stub and message expectation with any_number_of_times, for example: myMock = mock("mymock") myMock.stub!(:is_a?).with(MyClass).and_return(false) and myMock = mock("mymock") myMock.should_receive(:is_a?).with(MyClass).any_number_of_times.and_return(false) because is_a? may not be called at all, it just like a

Hi, I am wondering if there is a way to secure rails application logs ? My issue is that I discovered that form parameters are shown in clear in the logs. So when users are authenticating, you see the login and password in clear Processing LoginController#index (for xxxxx at 2008-10-16 11:22:43) [POST] Session ID: 8cb95e2e50332added5715eff9e84938 Parameters:

Not sure if this is possible currently. I have a section of code like this: ActiveRecord::Base.transaction do cow.save! duck.save! dog.save! end (Names changed to protect the innocent.) I''d like to specify that the saves run in a transaction. I can do ActiveRecord::Base.should_receive(:transaction).and_yield But is there any way to specify that the code is

I have something like the following: def my_fun my_fun2 do raise Error end end I know that I can verify that the method receives my_fun2. How can I mock/stub out the example to verify that it calls raise Error? Scott

Hi all, I have no idea if this question is to easy to be answered, but I?m starting with R. So, here we go. I have a large dataset with a lot of steps a judicial case. A sample is attached. I?d like to do a cluster analysis to try to understand with one is the most usual path followed by this legal cases. After that, I?d like to plot a cluster tree. In the attached sample, the column: -

Hello Jakob, I'm still getting the error, I can give you any other debug info you need. I haven't pasted the regalloc debug info here because it is quite huge, but if you tell me what specific details you need I will include them. Thanks for your help! 2012/7/14 Jakob Stoklund Olesen <stoklund at 2pi.dk> > > On Jul 14, 2012, at 10:09 AM, Borja Ferrer <borja.ferav at

Hello Jakob, Did you get a chance to take a look into this, and if not, can you do it when you get some spare time? Thanks! 2012/12/19 Borja Ferrer <borja.ferav at gmail.com> > We did something like this back when the register allocator couldn't split >> live ranges. >> > > Yes, I remember the isWinToJoinCrossClass() function, removed here: > >

Dear all, Assume that I have an S4 class "MyClass" with a slot "myname", which is initialized to: myname="" in method("initialize"): myclass <- new("MyClass", myname="") Assume that class "MyClass" has a method "mymethod": "mymethod.MyClass" <- function(object, myname=character(0), ...) {

Dear All, In R 3.6.3 (and earlier), method dispatch used to work for methods stored in local environments that are attached to the search path. For example: myfun <- function(y) { out <- list(y=y) class(out) <- "myclass" return(out) } print.myclass <- function(x, ...) print(formatC(x$y, format="f", digits=5)) myfun(1:4) # prints: [1]

Hello everyone, I'm working on a package using S4 classes and methods and I ran into the following "problem" when I tried to create an "apply" method for objects of one of my new classes. I've found a way around the problem but I wonder if I did not paint myself into the corner. I'd like your opinion about that. So I have an object "myObj" of class

I''m trying to spec out a render partial collection but I get the following error 2) NoMethodError in ''/games/_game.rhtml should show game name'' undefined method `body'' for #<#<Class:0x316580c>:0x2f1154c> /Volumes/EXTERNAL/web/omenking.ca/vendor/plugins/rspec_on_rails/lib/spec/rails/matchers/have_text.rb:12:in `matches?''

Hi all ! I noticed a strange behaviour of the function `class<-` when a class-specific '[[.' method is defined. Here below a reproducible example : #-------------------------------------------------------------------. counttt <- 0 `[[.MYCLASS` = function(x, ...) { counttt <<- counttt + 1 # browser() x = NextMethod() return(x) } df <- as.data.frame(matrix(1:20,

Given this code (which renders rjs), I''m faced with the fixture- driven way of spec-ing or mocking. How the heck to you mock this so the code at line (2) and (4) work right? I''m still struggling with mocks but it seems like this can be done. Forgive the naivety of this question. 1. def change_quantity 2. @line_item = LineItem.find_by_id(params[:id]) 3. unless

Dears, I have a question about copying reference objects using the initialize method. 1) If the latter has no arguments, there is no problem to copy an object. myClass = setRefClass("myClass", fields = list(value = "numeric") ) myClass$methods(initialize = function(...){ ? value <<- 1 ? callSuper(...) }) newObject = myClass$new() newObject$value = 2 copyObject =

Dear R-Users I have a list with two vectors of doubles tha have different lengths. I want to export it to a file and I also want to print it in two columns. I try with write.table but it need vectors of the same length. Does anyone know how to do it? Thanks Borja [[alternative HTML version deleted]]