similar to: [Bug 926] pam_session_close called as user or not at all

https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=926 Damien Miller <djm at mindrot.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |djm at mindrot.org --- Comment #36 from Damien Miller <djm at mindrot.org> 2008-06-30 17:39:52 ---

http://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=926 Summary: pam_session_close called as user or not at all Product: Portable OpenSSH Version: -current Platform: All URL: http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=openssh-unix- dev&m=106458208520320 OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: normal

https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=926 Darren Tucker <dtucker at zip.com.au> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Attachment #1216|0 |1 is obsolete| |

http://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=926 ------- Comment #8 from djm at mindrot.org 2006-05-22 15:12 ------- I don't understand - surely the limits should be applied in the *child* process and not the parent process? ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.

http://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=926 ------- Comment #21 from t8m at centrum.cz 2006-08-05 01:18 ------- The patch causes a regression with pam_krb5 module. See https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=201341 As I said above I think that the only correct solution which would solve all cases (privsep yes/no, root/regular user) would be to add another fork before the

http://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=926 carsten.benecke at rrz.uni-hamburg.de changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |carsten.benecke at rrz.uni- | |hamburg.de ------- Comment #16 from

https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=926 Darren Tucker <dtucker at zip.com.au> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |1353 --- Comment #27 from Darren Tucker <dtucker at zip.com.au> 2008-01-01 02:05:40 --- Patch #1216

http://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=926 dtucker at zip.com.au changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|994 | nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From dtucker at zip.com.au 2005-05-22 11:03 -------

http://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=926 dtucker at zip.com.au changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |914 nThis| | Status|NEW |ASSIGNED ------- You are

http://bugzilla.netfilter.org/show_bug.cgi?id=706 Jan Engelhardt <jengelh at medozas.de> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |jengelh at medozas.de --- Comment #1 from Jan Engelhardt <jengelh at medozas.de> 2011-03-03 14:20:30

https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/show_bug.cgi?id=600 Jan Engelhardt <jengelh at medozas.de> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |jengelh at medozas.de --- Comment #8 from Jan Engelhardt <jengelh at medozas.de> 2013-07-09 16:14:23 CEST

https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/show_bug.cgi?id=580 Jan Engelhardt <jengelh at medozas.de> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|RESOLVED |REOPENED Resolution|WONTFIX | --- Comment #4 from Jan Engelhardt <jengelh at

Hello list, pxelinux is stuck in the following place: PXELINUX 2.11 0x4321babe ... My IP address seems to be AC1300FE 172.19.0.254 ip=172.19.0.254:0.0.0.0:172.19.0.1:255.255.255.0 TFTP prefix: Trying to load: pxelinux.cfg/01-00-0c-29-49-49-c9 (waits here for a while before proceeding to...) Trying to load: pxelinux.cfg/AC1300FE tcpdump shows me: IP 172.19.0.254.57091 > 0.0.0.0:69: 50 RRQ

--- Jan Engelhardt <jengelh@computergmbh.de> wrote: > Hi, > > > there is an interesting case when the FLAC encoder (using 1.2.0) is > given simple waves. Simple waves means: I have a list of {frequency, > duration, pause} tuples that define the monophonic tune. In other > words, exactly one frequency is played at a time. > > This is the original dataset from

Split CFLAGS into CFLAGS (user part) and AM_CFLAGS (not-so-user part; variable name taken from automake, but otherwise no relation). Also add LDFLAGS. This allows me to use `make CFLAGS="-O2 -fPIE" LDFLAGS="-pie"` without dropping the other important (AM_CFLAGS) flags. Signed-off-by: Jan Engelhardt <jengelh@computergmbh.de> --- btrfs-progs/Makefile | 17

Hi, As I was compile-testing 2.6.33-rc with gcc-3.3, binutils-2.19.51-10.26.4.x86_64, I observed a failure when CONFIG_PARAVIRT is turned on: [any file] /home/jengelh/code/linux/arch/x86/include/asm/paravirt.h: In function `rif_seq_stop': /home/jengelh/code/linux/arch/x86/include/asm/paravirt.h:763: warning: asm operand 5 probably doesn't match constraints

Hi, As I was compile-testing 2.6.33-rc with gcc-3.3, binutils-2.19.51-10.26.4.x86_64, I observed a failure when CONFIG_PARAVIRT is turned on: [any file] /home/jengelh/code/linux/arch/x86/include/asm/paravirt.h: In function `rif_seq_stop': /home/jengelh/code/linux/arch/x86/include/asm/paravirt.h:763: warning: asm operand 5 probably doesn't match constraints

http://bugzilla.netfilter.org/show_bug.cgi?id=665 --- Comment #10 from Jan Engelhardt <jengelh at medozas.de> 2011-06-24 20:27:26 --- Because I can't know what the user would like to log, s/he still has to define his/her own ulogd logging stack (as it is called). -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.netfilter.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail

https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/show_bug.cgi?id=580 --- Comment #6 from Jan Engelhardt <jengelh at medozas.de> 2013-06-24 20:32:22 CEST --- >Unclear how you can say with certainty that this is impossible Right now, tables are output in permutations that are considered to be random. (Sure there is module load order, but that is not documented, nor is it actually a usable assumption for

On 19 Nov 2017, at 0.40, Jan Engelhardt <jengelh at inai.de> wrote: > > > Making third-party plugins for Dovecot is really hard and frustrating. > Using dovecot 2.2.33.2 and the following sources, the compile errors keep > coming. The use of g++ is mandated as the underlying backend this plugin > will access only has a C++ interface. See compile instructions for example