similar to: [Bug 1357] New: SOCKS proxy attempts fail to some servers due to DNS timeouts

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 3000 matches similar to: "[Bug 1357] New: SOCKS proxy attempts fail to some servers due to DNS timeouts"

2009 Dec 14
1
[Bug 1685] New: ssh attempts v4 connection w/v6 BindAddress setting in ssh config
https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1685 Summary: ssh attempts v4 connection w/v6 BindAddress setting in ssh config Product: Portable OpenSSH Version: 5.3p1 Platform: All OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: Miscellaneous AssignedTo:
2023 Jan 20
17
[Bug 3526] New: Config option AddressFamily has no effect?
https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3526 Bug ID: 3526 Summary: Config option AddressFamily has no effect? Product: Portable OpenSSH Version: 9.0p1 Hardware: amd64 OS: Mac OS X Status: NEW Severity: trivial Priority: P5 Component: ssh Assignee: unassigned-bugs at
2006 Jul 07
1
rsync: failed to hard-link error message
Dear Rsync, I am seeing the following rsync error messages and I am wondering if it is a sign of trouble, expected behavior, or a bug: rsync: failed to hard-link /Volumes/backups/vanguard/backup.0/dev/agpgart with dev/agpgart: Invalid argument (22) rsync: failed to hard-link /Volumes/backups/vanguard/backup.0/dev/apm_bios with dev/apm_bios: Invalid argument (22) rsync: failed to hard-link
2015 Apr 20
0
NSLCD works, do I need RFC2307 extensions enabled in AD as well?
On 20/04/15 17:45, john wrote: > > > > Is this wheezy ? if so, it might be an idea to use backports, this > will get you 4.1.17 which is still in development, 3.6 is now EOL > OK, I understand a bit better where your problems lie. I would still use backports, supported code is (hopefully) better code :-) > > > I'd be willing to do that if it got me support
2007 Sep 07
0
Is there a simple way to let particular windows users have read/write on ALL samba shares?
Hi all, I have a samba server that provides storage for student users. Teachers want to be able to see and copy files from one student directory to another, but students should not be able to see and copy files from other students. I thought defining my teachers as "admin users" would do the trick but it didn't. What is the most rational way to do this? My SAMBA Server is joined to
2009 Feb 15
2
Unadulterated plot
To all, Apologies if this question has already been asked but I can't find anything. I can't seem to think of more specific search terms. I want to display/create a file of a pure plot with a specific height and width. I want to utilise every single pixel inside the axes. I do not want to display any margins, legends, axes, titles or spaces around the edges. Is this possible?
2015 Apr 21
3
NSLCD works, do I need RFC2307 extensions enabled in AD as well?
On 04/20/2015 02:01 PM, Rowland Penny wrote: > > I would suggest you try it on a test set up in a VM and if it works, go > to production. > > Rowland > Hi Rowland, Ok, I think I am pretty close. Still using Samba 3.3.6 since I couldn't seem to get Samba 4 to work from backports. My sticking point right now is that winbind is mapping the wrong UID to my test user.
2015 Apr 21
0
NSLCD works, do I need RFC2307 extensions enabled in AD as well?
On 21/04/15 19:53, john_s wrote: > On 04/20/2015 02:01 PM, Rowland Penny wrote: > >> >> I would suggest you try it on a test set up in a VM and if it works, go >> to production. >> >> Rowland >> > > Hi Rowland, > > Ok, I think I am pretty close. Still using Samba 3.3.6 since I > couldn't seem to get Samba 4 to work from backports. >
2016 Nov 09
7
[Bug 2636] New: Fix X11 forwarding, when ::1 is not configured
https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2636 Bug ID: 2636 Summary: Fix X11 forwarding, when ::1 is not configured Product: Portable OpenSSH Version: 7.3p1 Hardware: Sparc OS: Solaris Status: NEW Severity: minor Priority: P5 Component: sshd Assignee: unassigned-bugs at
2012 Jul 21
0
Re Powercom Vanguard driver for nut
Hi Have been trying to get nut and Powercom Vanguard 2000 ups communicating ? in the /lib/udev/rules.d/52-nut-usbups.rules file we have this entry #? PowerCOM VGD - Vanguard? - usbhid-ups ATTR{idVendor}=="0d9f", ATTR{idProduct}=="0004", MODE="664", GROUP="nut" ? In the /etc/ups/ups.conf [UPS] ??????? driver = usbhid-ups ??????? port =
2012 Jul 21
2
Fwd: Re Powercom Vanguard driver for nut
resending to the list - got an error the first time. From: Charles Lepple <clepple at gmail.com> Subject: Re: [Nut-upsuser] Re Powercom Vanguard driver for nut Date: July 21, 2012 1:21:22 PM EDT To: Gordon Longland <gordon at compsos.com.au> Cc: nut-upsuser at lists.alioth.debian.org <nut-upsuser at lists.alioth.debian.org> On Jul 21, 2012, at 7:52 AM, Gordon Longland wrote:
2015 Oct 26
8
[Bug 2483] New: use AI_ADDRCONFIG flag for getaddrinfo() hints on Solaris
https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2483 Bug ID: 2483 Summary: use AI_ADDRCONFIG flag for getaddrinfo() hints on Solaris Product: Portable OpenSSH Version: 6.8p1 Hardware: All OS: Solaris Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P5 Component:
2003 Jun 22
6
[Bug 534] No option to use IPv6 connections by default
http://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=534 brent at graveland.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|RESOLVED |REOPENED Resolution|FIXED | ------- Additional Comments From brent at graveland.net 2003-06-23 09:29
2009 May 18
1
Wine & Socks
For what I can see there is no socks support built in in wine and also if u try to force socks tunneling through tsocks the windows program are not "socksifed". You can run freecap inside wine and then run through freecap the socksified program and this way it works, but I think it will be a nice to have feature to be able to run through socks. I've already implemented socks
1999 Mar 21
0
Windows networking and SOCKS proxies
Sorry...I deleted the thread about SOCKS before I realized I knew the solution... I checked up on how SMB connections work on an NT workstation running the Hummingbird SOCKS proxy. It looks like "net use..." and its GUI variant don't use the WINSOCK/WINSOCK 2 interface to make netbios-session (139/tcp) connections. The machine attempted to make a direct connection to the remote
2006 Mar 30
1
Dante Socks server
Hi, I am running centos server 4.2 and I have installed dante-server socks proxy I yumed it off a dag repo. The problem I am having is configuring it. I have edited the sockd.conf file but it still tells me that I don''t have an internal address setup. Does anyone have any suggestions. am I editing the wrong config file. if I do a locate sock*.conf I get the following list
2011 Sep 29
1
ssh -D socks proxy through CentOS-5
Is there anything special in the way of configuration that is required to enable a CentOS box to act as the point of origin for an http request routed to it via a SOCKS ssh link? I have researched this matter and the recommended procedure is to open an SSH connection to the desired host passing the requisite switches so: ssh -f -n -D <port> user at host.domain.tld And then reconfigure
2015 Jun 18
3
What does the socks function of openssh hide?
Salutations, I was recently using openssh 6.8p1-3 for socks tunelling with a public wifi hotspot. I attempted to watch youtube but was notified that it was not allowed in my area. The socks server I was connected to definitely had the ability to connect to youtube, so I concluded the issue was with the public wifi hotspot. How much does socks tunneling with openssh obscure? Command : ssh -ND
2006 Feb 16
1
Socks server
Hi, I need to setup a socks server on my Centos 4.2 box. I need to have windows clients connect to a remote socks server to force all their traffic through a content filtered proxy server. Does anyone have any suggestions on a good socks server that will work with Centos Thanks Mace
2009 Mar 04
2
[PATCH] accept SOCKS request over the mux socket
Hi, The attached patch extends the mux listener to accept SOCKS requests in addition to the native mux commands. The rationale behind is that creating tunnels attached to TCP ports is a security hazard in multi-user machines where there is no way to control who connects through the tunnels. On the other hand, The mux UNIX domain socket binds to the file system and regular permissions can be