similar to: Installation sequence for 4.2 / 3.6 dual boot

Hi there! I am new to the list, and to OpenSolaris, as well as ZPS. I am creating a zpool/zfs to use on my NAS server, and basically I want some redundancy for my files/media. What I am looking to do, is get a bunch of 2TB drives, and mount them mirrored, and in a zpool so that I don''t have to worry about running out of room. (I know, pretty typical I guess). My problem is, is that

Full_Name: Jens Oehlschl?gel Version: 2.5.1 OS: Windows Submission from: (NULL) (62.159.183.42) Even when specifying the full path, the output of fc is not sent to R (neither shown nor returned). For example > system('c:\\WINDOWS\\system32\\fc.exe /?',intern=TRUE) character(0) When I do the same from python 2.3, I get >>> import os >>>

Is there something special about filesystems mounted via the loop device, which prevents Samba from sharing them? I have a small LAN with several PCs on it. It has a few Windows machines, and a Linux machine running Mandrake 10 (kernel 2.6.3), which shares out its root ("/") read-only as "c". (Temporarily, for testing, it is shared with full write permissions, which I know

I have Windows 7 on /dev/sda and CentOS 6.4 on /dev/sdb. Here are the layouts: (parted) select /dev/sda Using /dev/sda (parted) print Model: ATA WDC WD10EZEX-00Z (scsi) Disk /dev/sda: 1000GB Sector size (logical/physical): 512B/4096B Partition Table: msdos Number Start End Size Type File system Flags 1 1049kB 374MB 373MB primary ntfs boot

All other patches from the sequence remain unchanged. Repost of patch 6 based on comments from Joey to follow. Mike

Hi All, I am looking at ZFS and I get that they call it RAIDZ which is similar to RAID 5, but what about RAID 10? Isn''t a RAID 10 setup better for data protection? So if I have 8 x 1.5tb drives, wouldn''t I: - mirror drive 1 and 5 - mirror drive 2 and 6 - mirror drive 3 and 7 - mirror drive 4 and 8 Then stripe 1,2,3,4 Then stripe 5,6,7,8 How does one do this with ZFS?

When booting with the xen it hangs after outputting only this ENABLING IO-APIC IRQ''s Brought up 1 CPU''s checking if image is intiramfs... it is Freeing initrd memory: 2803k freed NET: Registered protocol family 16 PCI: Using configuration type 1 Any help would be appreciated The information transmitted is intended only for the person or entity to which it is

Hi All, I sent the patch to make blktap work with PV-on-HVM. I corrected the part that had been pointed out in the Xen community. ・All xvdN disk is looked like hdN. ・All tap disks are checked.(tap:aio, tap:sync, tap:vmdk, etc.) We cannot use blktap for the volume of the system with PV-on-HVM and are embarrassed. Could you apply this patch? Or, please give the comment to me. Signed-off-by:

Previous implementation had staticly defined partitions to remove. This would break in the case of split Root and HostVG devices. Signed-off-by: Mike Burns <mburns at redhat.com> --- scripts/ovirt-config-boot | 11 +-------- scripts/ovirt-config-uninstall | 48 ++++++++++++++++++++++++--------------- scripts/ovirt-functions | 33 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 3 files

I've recently upgraded from RedHat 9 to CentOS 4.4. With RH9 I had a dual boot system with Windows XP (RH9 as the default of course!), which was automatically set up when I installed RH9 in the remaining partition after I'd installed XP. However, I appear to have lost my dual boot with CentOS 4.4 (no option to boot into DOS now), even though I still have the Windows XP partition, so how

HI all, I had centos on a laptop (dual boot xp). I am giving the laptop to another person so I removed centos. Now when I reboot grub is confused... I tried to manually enter rootnoverify (hd0,0) makeactive chainloader +1 boot This does boot into XP but how do I tell grub that this is the new rules and do this everytime at boot. Thanks, Jerry

Hi. Several months ago, I posted my first pass at a patch to transfer Mac OS X HFS+ metadata (resource forks and Finder metadata) to non-HFS+ filesystems (Linux, Solaris, etc). I finally got a chance to update the patch to reflect suggestions offered on the list. Thanks for the ideas, this version should be a big improvement. The diff and a binary (and a fuller explanation) can be found at:

I have been trying to multiboot centos 4.1 and the current solaris express build 15. I have two hard drive s, the first one ( hd0 ) devoted to CentOS 4.1 and windows xp (no problems). The second drive (hd1) for Solaris 10 only. I tried to boot solaris from CentOS grub and got the following error messages: Booting Solaris 10 root(hd1,0) Filesystem type unknown, partition type 0Xbf kernel

To test CentOS 5, I loaded from DVD adding it to a system at home running Fedora Core 7 T2. Partition Layout is: /dev/hda1 - / for the RH7T2 system /dev/hda2 - /home /dev/hda3 - swap /dev/hda4 - extended /dev/hda5 - / for CentOS 5 The system loaded cleanly and gave me the opportunity to tell grub about the other system. CentOS boots fine. Grub Stage 2 will show me both systems.

Hi, I've recently benchmarked btrfs v0.11 & v0.12 against ext2, ext3, ext4, jfs, reiserfs and xfs. OS: Ubuntu Hardy Kernel: 2.6.24(-5-server) Hardware: --------- Fu-Si Primergy RX330 S1 * AMD Opteron 2210 1.8 GHz * 1 GB RAM * 3 x 73 GB, 3Gb/s, hot plug, 10k rpm, 3.5" SAS HDD * LSI RAID 128 MB Fu-Si Econel 200 * Intel Xeon 5110 * 512 MB RAM

This set of patches introduces support for multipath devices for storage. Comments and suggestions are appreciated. Mike

Below is from make buildworld output on FreeBSD cvsup'd to RELENG_4 (so 4.8-STABLE) on the following hardware: Intel SHG2 Hodges Dual Xeon board 2 x Intel Xeon 2.4Ghz (512k) 2 x 512MB PC-2100 266Mhz ECC DDR Seagate 36GB 10K U320 LC SCSI Adaptec SCSI Raid 2000s 48MB SDRAM Intel Hudson 3 SC5200 base w 450W Any suggestions? Cheers, Carl. <snip> cc -o make_keys -O -pipe -I.

Hi all, I'd like to deploy a solution with dual-booting systems where CentOS 5.3 is already installed and WinXP will be installed to a separate disk. I found http://apcmag.com/how_to_dual_boot_linux_and_windows_xp_linux_installed_first.htm?page=1 and it seems straight forward enough, although the description is for Ubuntu. The problem as I see it, is that the how-to differs from how

On 02/27/2010 10:31 PM, swdamle at bsnl.in wrote: > Hello, > This has reference to ""Dos installer" from Win98se in Syslinux-3.84. > > Sorry to say the problem CONTINUES with Syslinux-3.85. Following is > for your reference please. > You may want to try: http://www.zytor.com/~hpa/syslinux/syslinux.com ... which is compiled with debugging information turned

The following patches introduce support for multipath and cciss devices to the ovirt-node and node-image. Comments are appreciated. These patches assume that the 3 patches (2 node, 1 node-image) from Joey are all incorporated. Mike