similar to: [Bug 910] known_hosts port numbers

http://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=910 mindrot at askneil.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |mindrot at askneil.com ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the

http://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=910 dtucker at zip.com.au changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Attachment #954 is|0 |1 obsolete| | Attachment #1052 is|0 |1 obsolete|

http://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1198 Summary: ssh associates the host identification to just IP/hostname , and it should also include remote port. Product: Portable OpenSSH Version: 4.3p2 Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P2

http://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=910 devin.nate at bridgecomm.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Attachment #980 is|0 |1 obsolete| | ------- Comment #39 from devin.nate at bridgecomm.net 2006-02-21 14:08

http://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=910 Summary: known_hosts port numbers Product: Portable OpenSSH Version: 3.7.1p2 Platform: All OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: ssh AssignedTo: openssh-bugs at mindrot.org ReportedBy: devin.nate at

http://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=910 djm at mindrot.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |foomzilla at fuhm.net ------- Additional Comments From djm at mindrot.org 2005-04-21 18:16 ------- *** Bug 454 has been marked as a

The .ssh/known_hosts table cannot handle reaching different sshd servers behind a NAT router. The machines are selected by having the SSHDs respond to differnt ports. A second request would be to allow known_hosts checking solely on the dns name, wildcarding the IP address. This would be useful to avoid continuously warning the user every time you connect to a machine with a changing IP address

http://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=393 markus at openbsd.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution| |INVALID ------- Additional Comments From markus at openbsd.org 2002-09-11

On Fri, 18 Aug 2023 at 17:18, Stuart Longland VK4MSL <me at vk4msl.com> wrote: > On 18/8/23 15:39, Darren Tucker wrote: [...] > > I think you just need "HostKeyAlias mytarget" here. > > Ahh, in my scanning through the `ssh_config` manpage, I missed this, and > change logs seem to indicate this feature has been around since at least > 2017, so should not cause

http://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=549 Summary: Login Delay / Remove unwanted reverse map check Product: Portable OpenSSH Version: 3.5p1 Platform: PPC OS/Version: AIX Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: sshd AssignedTo: openssh-unix-dev at mindrot.org ReportedBy:

http://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=910 dtucker at zip.com.au changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Attachment #920 is|0 |1 obsolete| | ------- Additional Comments From dtucker at zip.com.au 2005-08-09 23:09 -------

On 18/8/23 15:39, Darren Tucker wrote: >> Host mytarget >> Hostname 172.16.1.2 >> ProxyJump user2 at bastion2 > I think you just need "HostKeyAlias mytarget" here. Ahh, in my scanning through the `ssh_config` manpage, I missed this, and change logs seem to indicate this feature has been around since at least 2017, so should not cause

Hello Bob and thank you for your reply, first of all I hope that I'm answering in the right way since I had enabled the daily digest and I'm not sure if it's the right way to use Thunderbirds "Reply List" feature on this digest. If it's wrong this way I apologize. I turned of the daily digest so my next messages should be correct. > Are you aware of HostKeyAlias?

http://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=910 fullung at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |fullung at gmail.com ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the

On Fri, 18 Aug 2023 at 15:25, Stuart Longland VK4MSL <me at vk4msl.com> wrote: [...] > The crux of this is that we cannot assume the local IPv4 address is > unique, since it's not (and in many cases, not even static). If the IP address is not significant, you can tell ssh to not record them ("CheckHostIP no"). [...] > Host mytarget > Hostname 172.16.1.2

http://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=910 foomzilla at fuhm.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|RESOLVED |REOPENED Resolution|WONTFIX | ------- Additional Comments From foomzilla at fuhm.net 2004-11-23 11:15

On Tue, 29 Sep 2020 at 23:16, Nico Kadel-Garcia <nkadel at gmail.com> wrote: [...] > I gave up on $HOME/.ssh/known_hosts a *long* time ago, because if > servers are DHCP distributed without static IP addresses they can wind > up overlapping IP addresses with mismatched hostkeys You can set CheckHostIP=no in your config. As long as the names don't change it'll do what you

Hi all, When I set up multiple tunnels from remote hosts to ports on localhost, I get the following error when I try to use them: @@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@ @ WARNING: REMOTE HOST IDENTIFICATION HAS CHANGED! @ @@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@ IT IS POSSIBLE THAT SOMEONE IS DOING SOMETHING NASTY! (even though the keys haven't

Hi all, I noticed a bit of an odd issue with maintaining `known_hosts` when the target machine is behind a bastion using `ProxyJump` or `ProxyCommand` with host key clashes. Client for me right now is OpenSSH_9.3p1 on Gentoo Linux/AMD64. I'm a member of a team, and most of us use Ubuntu (yes, I'm a rebel). Another team who actually maintain this fleet often access the same machines

Hi everyone, I am trying to get Debian bug #668239 [1] resolved, which is concerned with the way paramiko (a SSH implementation in Python) deals with OpenSSH's known_hosts file when non-standard ports are used. Hence, I want to make sure that I correctly understand OpenSSH's behaviour. If this is not a topic for this list, please point me to a more appropriate list. As far as I can