similar to: [Bug 1189] PAM module hangs root logout

http://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1189 Summary: Stacked PAM modules hang root logout Product: Portable OpenSSH Version: 4.3p2 Platform: UltraSparc OS/Version: Solaris Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: PAM support AssignedTo: bitbucket at mindrot.org ReportedBy:

http://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=926 ------- Comment #8 from djm at mindrot.org 2006-05-22 15:12 ------- I don't understand - surely the limits should be applied in the *child* process and not the parent process? ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.

http://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=158 ------- Additional Comments From wknox at mitre.org 2002-03-12 06:43 ------- Created an attachment (id=38) Patch to fix described problem ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.

Is there anyone running Samba 3.0.X on Solaris 8 that has VFS working? I am dying to know if this is a problem with my setup or if there is something else going on. If you do have it working, please let me know which module. Thanks. Bill Knox Lead Operating Systems Programmer/Analyst The MITRE Corporation ---------- Forwarded message ---------- Date: Tue, 25 May 2004 13:54:26 -0400

http://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1189 dtucker at zip.com.au changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|RESOLVED |CLOSED ------- Comment #18 from dtucker at zip.com.au 2006-10-07 11:45 ------- Change all RESOLVED bug to CLOSED with the exception

http://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=84 wknox at mitre.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Version|-current |3.0.2p1 ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.

http://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=468 ------- Additional Comments From wknox at mitre.org 2003-01-15 07:36 ------- I'm not seeing this behavior on my Solaris 8 systems - latest patch cluster (1/8/03), including patch 109007-08. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.

http://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=245 ------- Additional Comments From wknox at mitre.org 2002-05-18 00:58 ------- Same issue with Solaris 8 built with gcc 2.95.2 with the following configure options: --without-rsh --with-tcp-wrappers --with-pam --disable-suid-ssh --with-prngd-socket --with-default-path=/usr/local/bin:/usr/bin:/bin:/usr/local/sbin:/usr/sbin:/sbin Running a ssh -v

I am having an unusual bit of behavior with a recently upgraded 3.0.8 installation (from 3.0.2a). I upgraded the server and retained the secrets.tdb file. The server itself is using security = domain, and it had been joined to the domain prior to the upgrade. Now, once I started the new version, I couldn't log on, and would get the error "There are no logon servers available to service

I have put together a simple set of diffs that corrects the problem described by Steven Fishback <sfishback at interpath.net> on 10-30 on this list regarding incorrect information reported by last on Solaris. The patches merely pass along the username in the utmpx record for a logout. Is there any reason why this would be a problem with other OSes? If not, maybe this could be rolled into the

HI all, ok. I read all the entries of this mailinglist with the subject nethwork path. I try everything but nothing happens. I have no more ideas what i can do. Pleaaaaaaasssseeee heeeeellllllppppp. (I also tried to walk throught document.txt) The problem: -Client Win2k -Server Suse Linux 8.0 with Samba -I completely installed and configured Samba. I walk throught the document of Samba. I tried

http://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=87 ------- Additional Comments From djm at mindrot.org 2002-02-13 23:14 ------- so a PAM session module is setting the last login time before we retrieve it? Why not just disable the module in the PAM config? BTW you should attach your patch using the "create a new attachment" link (under the keywords entry). Pasting them into the

We are running samba 2.0.4b to provide corporate print services. Everything with regards to printing is working like a charm. However, twice in the past two weeks, some of our Samba servers have disappeared from the WINS servers. The WINS servers are NT servers running 4.0SP5. The strangest part was that in one occurrence, it was the lone samba server at one location, but in the other

Hi, We would like to make one of our periodic releases shortly, so once again we are asking for readers of this list (or anyone else) to download and test a CVS snapshot of OpenSSH on your favourite platforms. The OpenBSD version is available in CVS HEAD: http://www.openbsd.org/anoncvs.html Portable snapshots are available the mirrors listed at http://www.openssh.com/portable.html#ftp in the

Hi, We would like to make one of our periodic releases shortly, so once again we are asking for readers of this list (or anyone else) to download and test a CVS snapshot of OpenSSH on your favourite platforms. The OpenBSD version is available in CVS HEAD: http://www.openbsd.org/anoncvs.html Portable snapshots are available the mirrors listed at http://www.openssh.com/portable.html#ftp in the

http://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=926 carsten.benecke at rrz.uni-hamburg.de changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |carsten.benecke at rrz.uni- | |hamburg.de ------- Comment #16 from

Hello All, I'm using OpenSSH 4.3 compiled with PAM support. Im using a proprietary PAM module for my Authentication. When the root user logs out, it throws a message "pam_setcred : Pemission denied" in syslog. The PAM engineer told me that the module can't delete root users credentials. Instead he is asking me to skip the call pam_setcred() in sshpam_cleanup() in auth-pam.c

http://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=345 stevesk at pobox.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |Lutz.Jaenicke at aet.TU- | |Cottbus.DE ------- Additional Comments From stevesk at

Hi. Solaris packages created by buildpkg.sh don't create privsep user or group and sshd won't start until they are created (or privsep is disabled): ## Executing postinstall script. starting /usr/local/sbin/sshd... Privilege separation user sshd does not exist /etc/init.d/opensshd: Error 255 starting /usr/local/sbin/sshd... bailing. The attached patch (against -cvs) ports the relevant

http://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=84 Summary: last command provides incorrect information on Solaris 8 Product: Portable OpenSSH Version: -current Platform: UltraSparc OS/Version: Solaris Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: ssh AssignedTo: openssh-unix-dev at mindrot.org