similar to: [Bug 910] known_hosts port numbers

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 6000 matches similar to: "[Bug 910] known_hosts port numbers"

2006 Feb 21
0
[Bug 910] known_hosts port numbers
http://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=910 devin.nate at bridgecomm.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Attachment #980 is|0 |1 obsolete| | ------- Comment #39 from devin.nate at bridgecomm.net 2006-02-21 14:08
2004 Sep 10
11
[Bug 910] known_hosts port numbers
http://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=910 mindrot at askneil.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |mindrot at askneil.com ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the
2006 Jun 19
3
[Bug 910] known_hosts port numbers
http://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=910 dtucker at zip.com.au changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |ildefonso_camargo at yahoo.com ------- Comment #42 from dtucker at zip.com.au 2006-06-20 09:32 ------- *** Bug 1198 has been marked
2012 Nov 06
0
Semantics of known_hosts file
Hi everyone, I am trying to get Debian bug #668239 [1] resolved, which is concerned with the way paramiko (a SSH implementation in Python) deals with OpenSSH's known_hosts file when non-standard ports are used. Hence, I want to make sure that I correctly understand OpenSSH's behaviour. If this is not a topic for this list, please point me to a more appropriate list. As far as I can
2005 Apr 21
11
[Bug 910] known_hosts port numbers
http://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=910 djm at mindrot.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |foomzilla at fuhm.net ------- Additional Comments From djm at mindrot.org 2005-04-21 18:16 ------- *** Bug 454 has been marked as a
2023 Aug 18
1
Host key verification (known_hosts) with ProxyJump/ProxyCommand
On Fri, 18 Aug 2023 at 17:18, Stuart Longland VK4MSL <me at vk4msl.com> wrote: > On 18/8/23 15:39, Darren Tucker wrote: [...] > > I think you just need "HostKeyAlias mytarget" here. > > Ahh, in my scanning through the `ssh_config` manpage, I missed this, and > change logs seem to indicate this feature has been around since at least > 2017, so should not cause
2005 Dec 10
2
known_hosts and multiple hosts through a NAT router
The .ssh/known_hosts table cannot handle reaching different sshd servers behind a NAT router. The machines are selected by having the SSHDs respond to differnt ports. A second request would be to allow known_hosts checking solely on the dns name, wildcarding the IP address. This would be useful to avoid continuously warning the user every time you connect to a machine with a changing IP address
2023 Aug 18
1
Host key verification (known_hosts) with ProxyJump/ProxyCommand
On 18/8/23 15:39, Darren Tucker wrote: >> Host mytarget >> Hostname 172.16.1.2 >> ProxyJump user2 at bastion2 > I think you just need "HostKeyAlias mytarget" here. Ahh, in my scanning through the `ssh_config` manpage, I missed this, and change logs seem to indicate this feature has been around since at least 2017, so should not cause
2006 Jun 19
1
[Bug 1198] ssh associates the host identification to just IP/hostname , and it should also include remote port.
http://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1198 Summary: ssh associates the host identification to just IP/hostname , and it should also include remote port. Product: Portable OpenSSH Version: 4.3p2 Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P2
2020 Mar 24
2
[Feature Request] Add (and check against) IP to known_hosts even when domain is used to connect
Hello Bob and thank you for your reply, first of all I hope that I'm answering in the right way since I had enabled the daily digest and I'm not sure if it's the right way to use Thunderbirds "Reply List" feature on this digest. If it's wrong this way I apologize. I turned of the daily digest so my next messages should be correct. > Are you aware of HostKeyAlias?
2023 Aug 18
1
Host key verification (known_hosts) with ProxyJump/ProxyCommand
On Fri, 18 Aug 2023 at 15:25, Stuart Longland VK4MSL <me at vk4msl.com> wrote: [...] > The crux of this is that we cannot assume the local IPv4 address is > unique, since it's not (and in many cases, not even static). If the IP address is not significant, you can tell ssh to not record them ("CheckHostIP no"). [...] > Host mytarget > Hostname 172.16.1.2
2002 Sep 10
8
[Bug 393] 'known_hosts' file should be indexed by IP:PORT, not just IP
http://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=393 markus at openbsd.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution| |INVALID ------- Additional Comments From markus at openbsd.org 2002-09-11
2005 Sep 14
9
[Bug 910] known_hosts port numbers
http://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=910 fullung at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |fullung at gmail.com ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the
2004 Aug 05
0
[Bug 910] known_hosts port numbers
http://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=910 Summary: known_hosts port numbers Product: Portable OpenSSH Version: 3.7.1p2 Platform: All OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: ssh AssignedTo: openssh-bugs at mindrot.org ReportedBy: devin.nate at
2005 Aug 09
3
[Bug 910] known_hosts port numbers
http://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=910 dtucker at zip.com.au changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Attachment #920 is|0 |1 obsolete| | ------- Additional Comments From dtucker at zip.com.au 2005-08-09 23:09 -------
2005 Aug 02
2
port forwarding trouble
Hi all, When I set up multiple tunnels from remote hosts to ports on localhost, I get the following error when I try to use them: @@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@ @ WARNING: REMOTE HOST IDENTIFICATION HAS CHANGED! @ @@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@ IT IS POSSIBLE THAT SOMEONE IS DOING SOMETHING NASTY! (even though the keys haven't
2004 Nov 23
0
[Bug 910] known_hosts port numbers
http://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=910 foomzilla at fuhm.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|RESOLVED |REOPENED Resolution|WONTFIX | ------- Additional Comments From foomzilla at fuhm.net 2004-11-23 11:15
2015 Feb 22
3
PKI host based principal
Hello, Maybe I did not understand correctly the PKI trust, so forgive me if I am wrong. For example, I have multiple hosts that all serves as monitoring server, I would like to trust only these hosts, so I enrol a certificate for these using "monitoring" principal, so I can connect only to these. At first I thought we can do Match statement at ssh_config, however, the Match is being
2020 Sep 30
3
Human readable .ssh/known_hosts?
On Tue, 29 Sep 2020 at 23:16, Nico Kadel-Garcia <nkadel at gmail.com> wrote: [...] > I gave up on $HOME/.ssh/known_hosts a *long* time ago, because if > servers are DHCP distributed without static IP addresses they can wind > up overlapping IP addresses with mismatched hostkeys You can set CheckHostIP=no in your config. As long as the names don't change it'll do what you
2008 Aug 27
1
5.1p1 doesn't work, 5.0p1 works fine
5.1p1 disconnects after the password prompt when connecting to my router and UPS. 5.1p1 connects fine to other unix hosts, and my Windows client connects fine to 5.1p1 servers. 5.0p1 works fine everywhere. I've tried ssh -T, ssh -t, permutations with ssh -o Compression=no -o TCPKeepAlive=no, etc, to no avail. I've used the default ssh_config file, and it still fails. Can anyone