similar to: [Bug 1105] Privledge Separation

http://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1105 markus at openbsd.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Privledge Separation |Privilege Separation ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the

http://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1123 Summary: Never Completes Generating Keygen Product: Portable OpenSSH Version: 4.2p1 Platform: Other OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: ssh-keygen AssignedTo: bitbucket at mindrot.org ReportedBy: giffordj at

https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/cgi-bin/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110 Summary: TCP connection tracking Product: netfilter/iptables Version: patch-o-matic Platform: All OS/Version: other Status: NEW Severity: minor Priority: P2 Component: connection tracking AssignedTo: laforge@netfilter.org

https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/cgi-bin/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111 Summary: Compiler Error Messages Product: netfilter/iptables Version: linux-2.4.x Platform: other OS/Version: other Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: unknown AssignedTo: laforge@netfilter.org ReportedBy:

https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/cgi-bin/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112 Summary: String Match GCC 3.3 errors Product: netfilter/iptables Version: patch-o-matic Platform: other OS/Version: other Status: NEW Severity: minor Priority: P2 Component: unknown AssignedTo: laforge@netfilter.org

https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/cgi-bin/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113 Summary: tftp NAT Module Compile error Product: netfilter/iptables Version: patch-o-matic Platform: other OS/Version: other Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: NAT AssignedTo: laforge@netfilter.org

I had to modify the file monitor_mm.c to get the privledge separation to work for Linux 2.0.36 (and above) and am passing on the patch to you; if there is a better place to send this, please let me know. I've included a new #define (USE_MMAP_DEV_ZERO) to select this patch, but am not including the patch to config.h---if there's a better name for it, please, by all means, change it.

hi. i'm hitting a wall each time i try to format a 3 terabyte partition. i'm able to create the partition using parted but whenever i try to create a 3 terabyte xfs or jfs or ext3 filesystem, the mounted filesystem created is only 1 terabyte. i tried centos x86 and x86_64 4.0 but i always hit a 1 terabyte limit. please help.

Hi, Can anyone please help with the following: I have a running instance with interface <interface type='bridge'> <mac address='fa:16:3e:ba:a4:67'/> <source bridge='br100/> <target dev='vnet0'/> <model type='virtio'/> <filterref filter='nova-instance-instance-00000001-fa163ebaa467'/>

On 04 Jan 2011, at 08:30, Jakob Stoklund Olesen wrote: > I noticed that we generate code like this for i386 PIC: > > calll L0$pb > L0$pb: > popl %eax > movl %eax, -24(%ebp) ## 4-byte Spill > > I worry that this defeats the return address prediction for returns > in the function because calls and returns no longer are matched. According to benchmarks by

I'm struggling with getting this to work smoothly, meaning 1) from the host system I can resolve the names of the VM's and 2) from the VM's I can properly resolve the host name (I get 127.0.0.1, presumably because dnsmasq parsed /etc/hosts on the host). There was some encouraging discussion of this in 2010 (http://www.redhat.com/archives/libvir-list/2010-March/msg00005.html) but no

I noticed that we generate code like this for i386 PIC: calll L0$pb L0$pb: popl %eax movl %eax, -24(%ebp) ## 4-byte Spill I worry that this defeats the return address prediction for returns in the function because calls and returns no longer are matched. From Intel's Optimization Reference Manual: "The return address stack mechanism augments the static and dynamic

http://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=346 Summary: ssh fails with -C flag when connecting to a compression disabled server Product: Portable OpenSSH Version: -current Platform: ix86 OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: ssh AssignedTo:

hai is there any way to view the contents of ext3 journal form windows? regards ______________________________________ Scanned and protected by Email scanner -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/ext3-users/attachments/20070124/02f1d0a5/attachment.htm>

Hi, Can anyone please share sample Python code for using qemu+tcp with SASL or qemu+tls with SASL? (i.e., connecting to a hypervisor using qemu+tls or qemu+tcp when a username/password using SASL has been defined on the hypervisor) I am having some trouble figuring out how to use callbacks for authenticating from with my Python program. I assume I will have to

i posted on rhel list about proper creating of 6tb ext3 filesystem and tuning here.......http://www.redhat.com/archives/nahant-list/2006-November/msg00239.html i am reading lots of ext3 links like...... http://www.redhat.com/support/wpapers/redhat/ext3/ http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos/2005-September/052533.html http://batleth.sapienti-sat.org/projects/FAQs/ext3-faq.html ............but

https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1105 Bug ID: 1105 Summary: masquerade fully broken when no prerouting chain is created Product: nftables Version: unspecified Hardware: x86_64 OS: other Status: NEW Severity: major Priority: P5 Component: kernel

Hi everyone, I am using Xen 3.2.1 with the vtpm-12-patch.diff patch posted in [0]. My TPM is an Infineon 1.2. In total I have got three different questions: 1. NVM loading problem at VM creation When I am creating a VM the last few lines of the vtpm_manager output are: TPMD[245]: tpm/tpm_startup.c:45: Info: TPM_Startup(1) Loading NVM. Sending LoadNVM command ERROR[VTPM]: Failed to load

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 ========================================================== == == Subject: Boundary failure when parsing SMB responses == can result in a buffer overrun == == CVE ID#: CVE-2008-1105 == == Versions: Samba 3.0.0 - 3.0.29 (inclusive) == == Summary: Specifically crafted SMB responses can result == in a heap overflow

On Thu, 2016-08-04 at 22:21 -0400, Jonathan Billings wrote: > Is it a BIOS boot, or are you using the UEFI firmware for booting? > Either way, you might need a small boot partition (not /boot) at the > beginning of the disk. /boot/efi formatted FAT16, circa 150 MB -- Regards, Paul. England, EU. England's place is in the European Union.