similar to: [Bug 1077] Descriptions for "ssh -D" and DynamicForward should mention they can specify "bind_address" optionally

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 1000 matches similar to: "[Bug 1077] Descriptions for "ssh -D" and DynamicForward should mention they can specify "bind_address" optionally"

2004 Aug 05
1
LocalForward and RemoteForward bind patch
FINALLY, it's here. You can now tell SSH which address to bind to for every single port forwarding option! This patch allows you to pass the following as ssh command line options: ssh -L 192.168.1.55:1234:localhost:80 -R ::11:22:aa:bb/80/localhost/80 etc. Or as normal config file options: LocalForward ::11:22:33/1234 localhost/80 RemoteForward 1.2.3.4:80 localhost:80 It will also
2002 Jan 05
2
new feature w/ patch
I've attached a patch to OpenSSH 3.0.2p1 that will allow the client side of local port forwarding to be bound to a single address. For my purposes, binding to 127.0.0.1 or (via GatewayPorts) all addresses would not work. I overloaded the "-b local_host" option so that it's address will be used when "-L port:remote_host:remote_port" is also specified. Today is the first
2012 Feb 12
0
PATCH: multiple BindAddress
Hello all, I recently have a problem with multiple addresses and address families. Problem is simple, i have some hosts with IPv4 access only and some with IPv6 access. This wouldn't be big problem if I had a stable IP addresses. But sometimes I move to another network with complete different addresses. So I created patch which on option BindAddress accept list of addresses. With ip I solved
2009 Jan 19
1
Bug CVE-2005-2797
Hi Everyone, I am using openssh 4.0 in a product, which is affected by CVE-2005-2797 (If DynamicForward option is activated, GatewayPorts is also unconditionally enabled). I am trying to backport the fix for this from 4.2 to 4.0. I have been finding the difference between 4.2 and 4.1 and the only change that looks relevant to this bug, to me is the changes made in the file readconf.c with the
2018 Oct 19
2
OpenSSH socket forwarding in ssh_config file?
On 19Oct2018 17:12, Damien Miller <djm at mindrot.org> wrote: >On Fri, 19 Oct 2018, Cameron Simpson wrote: >> The ssh command line's -L option has supported socket forwarding for >> a while, >> but as far as I can tell the ssh_config file does not, even in 7.9. > >It does, look for LocalForward Pardon me, I've been unclear. I don't mean TCP forwards
2014 Jun 23
1
-h, --help option
Hi, tmux author refuses to add -h, --help option, because OpenSSH does not have it [1]. I don't see why convenience features of tmux should depend on OpenSSH, but because I have no other choice (and got curious) I ask here - why OpenSSH doesn't provide -h or --help option? I use PuTTY as my client, which processes --help option, and for `ssh` binary I usually use Google + StackOverflow.
2010 Dec 02
0
[PATCH] ssh.1: Clarify remote bind_address usage
Hi all, A server with [GatewayPorts "yes"] also ignores client's remote bind_address parameter, contrary to what is implied by the current description. Cheers! Index: src/usr.bin/ssh/ssh.1 =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/src/usr.bin/ssh/ssh.1,v retrieving revision 1.316 diff -u src/usr.bin/ssh/ssh.1 --- src/usr.bin/ssh/ssh.1 18
2014 Dec 04
4
[Bug 2324] New: remote port forward w/ empty bind_address via multiplexed connection: doc violation
https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2324 Bug ID: 2324 Summary: remote port forward w/ empty bind_address via multiplexed connection: doc violation Product: Portable OpenSSH Version: 6.7p1 Hardware: amd64 OS: Linux Status: NEW Severity: trivial Priority: P5
2010 Jan 14
1
ssh(1) multiplexing rewrite
Hi, At the n2k10 OpenBSD network hackathon, I finally got some time to clean up and rewrite the ssh(1) client multiplexing code. The attached diffs (one for portable OpenSSH, one for OpenBSD) are the result, and they need some testing. The revised multiplexing code uses a better protocol between the master and slave processes and I even bothered to write it up :) It tracks the control sockets
2004 Apr 30
1
Code question (canohost.c)
On Fri, 30 Apr 2004, YOSHIFUJI Hideaki / [iso-2022-jp] $B5HF#1QL@(B wrote: > In article <Pine.BSO.4.44.0404292059520.953-100000 at etoh.eviladmin.org> (at Thu, 29 Apr 2004 21:00:26 -0500 (CDT)), Ben Lindstrom <mouring at etoh.eviladmin.org> says: > > > Be that true.. then one should review the usage of it in sshconnect.c > > which is the other place we do it. >
2005 Nov 11
1
Can't get LocalForward to work when using ControlPath
Hello All-- First, thanks for ControlPath/ControlMaster. It's very handy, and ControlMaster=autoask is just what i wanted! I'm having difficulty with a common use case, however. I want to LocalForward on secondary connections using an already-established ControlPath. From what i can tell, the second ssh connection doesn't report any errors, but silently ignores the supplied
2016 Jun 20
2
[Bug 2592] New: -R bind_address not working, always bind 0.0.0.0
https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2592 Bug ID: 2592 Summary: -R bind_address not working, always bind 0.0.0.0 Product: Portable OpenSSH Version: 7.2p1 Hardware: amd64 OS: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 Component: sshd Assignee: unassigned-bugs at
2008 Sep 07
1
"on-the-fly" SSH Port Forwarding
Hi, I am using the following version of OpenSSH for reference: root at proxy:/root# ssh -V OpenSSH_4.8, OpenSSL 0.9.7j 04 May 2006 root at proxy:/root# uname -a OpenBSD proxy.localdomain 4.3 GENERIC#698 i386 I am developing an application which uses on-the-fly SSH port forwarding by using the "~C" escape sequence to add local port forwards when needed (through Expect). It would
2013 Sep 17
1
[Bug 1285] provide fallback options /etc/ssh/ssh_config
https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1285 Flavio Poletti <flavio at polettix.it> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |flavio at polettix.it --- Comment #8 from Flavio Poletti <flavio at polettix.it> --- Created attachment
2008 Sep 26
0
RFE: DynamicForward on ~C commandline and via ControlMaster
Hiyas, currently the commandline that can be reached via ~C cannot create new DynamicForwards. This is a feature I really miss, therefore it would be nice, if it could be implemented, e.g. -D 12345 should open a new socks proxy on port 12345 on the local machine. Also I want to ask what the status on allowing additional a {Local,Remote,Dynamic}Forward using in combination with ControlMaster
2002 Jan 07
1
rsync-2.5.1 / socket.c - unititialized variable breaks build.
In socket.c, the variable error is unitilialzed. Also the variable length should be an unsigned int. EAGLE> type socket.gdiff --- ref_src:socket.c Sat Jan 5 13:27:07 2002 +++ lcl_src:socket.c Sun Jan 6 08:40:51 2002 @@ -1,3 +1,4 @@ +/* Converted by prj_src:unix_c_to_vms_c.tpu AND prj_src:socket.tpu on 6-JAN-20 02 08:40:51.01 OPENVMS_AXP */ /* -*- c-file-style: "linux"
2005 Nov 24
5
Call for release testing
Hi All, We are planning on doing one of our regular releases (4.3/4.3p1) in around a week. This is a bugfix release, but a few of the portability bits have changed, so we would again appreciate testing on as many systems as possible. Some of the bugs fixed and internal improvements are: * X forwarding won't start when a command is executed in background (Bug #1086) * Change
2023 Dec 20
0
print unreachable forwarding destinations?
When using LocalForward or DynamicForward sometimes the endpoint does no longer exist but I need to find out *which* endpoint exactly. For example: $ ssh -D 1234 server.example.net On the client, maybe in another terminal: $ curl --socks5-hostname localhost:1234 http://does-not-exist.local curl: (97) connection to proxy closed As expected. But on the server (OpenSSH 8.4), the following is
2020 Sep 29
4
[Bug 3214] New: Man page should specify which switches are incompatible with a 'command'
https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3214 Bug ID: 3214 Summary: Man page should specify which switches are incompatible with a 'command' Product: Portable OpenSSH Version: 8.3p1 Hardware: Other OS: Linux Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P5
2020 Nov 12
0
run firefox via an ssh tunnel
On Thu, Nov 12, 2020 at 10:02:57AM -0700, S Bob wrote: > On 11/12/20 7:50 AM, Jonathan Billings wrote: > > If this is actually something you want to do with regularity, I > > suggest using the SSH SOCKS proxy (with the DynamicForward port), and > > configure Firefox to use the localhost:port as a SOCKS5 proxy. Then > > all traffic in firefox will be routed over the ssh