Displaying 20 results from an estimated 1000 matches similar to: "[Bug 1077] Descriptions for "ssh -D" and DynamicForward should mention they can specify "bind_address" optionally"
2004 Aug 05
1
LocalForward and RemoteForward bind patch
FINALLY, it's here.
You can now tell SSH which address to bind to for every single port
forwarding option! This patch allows you to pass the following as ssh
command line options:
ssh -L 192.168.1.55:1234:localhost:80 -R ::11:22:aa:bb/80/localhost/80
etc.
Or as normal config file options:
LocalForward ::11:22:33/1234 localhost/80
RemoteForward 1.2.3.4:80 localhost:80
It will also
2002 Jan 05
2
new feature w/ patch
I've attached a patch to OpenSSH 3.0.2p1 that will allow the client
side of local port forwarding to be bound to a single address. For
my purposes, binding to 127.0.0.1 or (via GatewayPorts) all addresses
would not work. I overloaded the "-b local_host" option so that
it's address will be used when "-L port:remote_host:remote_port"
is also specified.
Today is the first
2012 Feb 12
0
PATCH: multiple BindAddress
Hello all,
I recently have a problem with multiple addresses and address
families. Problem is simple, i have some hosts with IPv4 access only
and some with IPv6 access. This wouldn't be big problem if I had a
stable IP addresses. But sometimes I move to another network with
complete different addresses. So I created patch which on option
BindAddress accept list of addresses. With ip I solved
2009 Jan 19
1
Bug CVE-2005-2797
Hi Everyone,
I am using openssh 4.0 in a product, which is affected by
CVE-2005-2797 (If DynamicForward option is activated, GatewayPorts is
also unconditionally enabled). I am trying to backport the fix for
this from 4.2 to 4.0. I have been finding the difference between 4.2
and 4.1 and the only change that looks relevant to this bug, to me is
the changes made in the file readconf.c with the
2018 Oct 19
2
OpenSSH socket forwarding in ssh_config file?
On 19Oct2018 17:12, Damien Miller <djm at mindrot.org> wrote:
>On Fri, 19 Oct 2018, Cameron Simpson wrote:
>> The ssh command line's -L option has supported socket forwarding for
>> a while,
>> but as far as I can tell the ssh_config file does not, even in 7.9.
>
>It does, look for LocalForward
Pardon me, I've been unclear.
I don't mean TCP forwards
2014 Jun 23
1
-h, --help option
Hi,
tmux author refuses to add -h, --help option, because OpenSSH
does not have it [1]. I don't see why convenience features of tmux
should depend on OpenSSH, but because I have no other choice
(and got curious) I ask here - why OpenSSH doesn't provide -h or
--help option?
I use PuTTY as my client, which processes --help option, and for
`ssh` binary I usually use Google + StackOverflow.
2010 Dec 02
0
[PATCH] ssh.1: Clarify remote bind_address usage
Hi all,
A server with [GatewayPorts "yes"] also ignores client's remote
bind_address parameter, contrary to what is implied by the current
description.
Cheers!
Index: src/usr.bin/ssh/ssh.1
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/src/usr.bin/ssh/ssh.1,v
retrieving revision 1.316
diff -u src/usr.bin/ssh/ssh.1
--- src/usr.bin/ssh/ssh.1 18
2014 Dec 04
4
[Bug 2324] New: remote port forward w/ empty bind_address via multiplexed connection: doc violation
https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2324
Bug ID: 2324
Summary: remote port forward w/ empty bind_address via
multiplexed connection: doc violation
Product: Portable OpenSSH
Version: 6.7p1
Hardware: amd64
OS: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: trivial
Priority: P5
2010 Jan 14
1
ssh(1) multiplexing rewrite
Hi,
At the n2k10 OpenBSD network hackathon, I finally got some time to clean
up and rewrite the ssh(1) client multiplexing code. The attached diffs
(one for portable OpenSSH, one for OpenBSD) are the result, and they
need some testing.
The revised multiplexing code uses a better protocol between the master
and slave processes and I even bothered to write it up :) It tracks the
control sockets
2004 Apr 30
1
Code question (canohost.c)
On Fri, 30 Apr 2004, YOSHIFUJI Hideaki / [iso-2022-jp] $B5HF#1QL@(B wrote:
> In article <Pine.BSO.4.44.0404292059520.953-100000 at etoh.eviladmin.org> (at Thu, 29 Apr 2004 21:00:26 -0500 (CDT)), Ben Lindstrom <mouring at etoh.eviladmin.org> says:
>
> > Be that true.. then one should review the usage of it in sshconnect.c
> > which is the other place we do it.
>
2005 Nov 11
1
Can't get LocalForward to work when using ControlPath
Hello All--
First, thanks for ControlPath/ControlMaster. It's very handy, and
ControlMaster=autoask is just what i wanted!
I'm having difficulty with a common use case, however. I want to
LocalForward on secondary connections using an already-established
ControlPath. From what i can tell, the second ssh connection doesn't
report any errors, but silently ignores the supplied
2016 Jun 20
2
[Bug 2592] New: -R bind_address not working, always bind 0.0.0.0
https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2592
Bug ID: 2592
Summary: -R bind_address not working, always bind 0.0.0.0
Product: Portable OpenSSH
Version: 7.2p1
Hardware: amd64
OS: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P5
Component: sshd
Assignee: unassigned-bugs at
2008 Sep 07
1
"on-the-fly" SSH Port Forwarding
Hi,
I am using the following version of OpenSSH for reference:
root at proxy:/root# ssh -V
OpenSSH_4.8, OpenSSL 0.9.7j 04 May 2006
root at proxy:/root# uname -a
OpenBSD proxy.localdomain 4.3 GENERIC#698 i386
I am developing an application which uses on-the-fly SSH port forwarding
by using the "~C" escape sequence to add local port forwards when needed
(through Expect). It would
2013 Sep 17
1
[Bug 1285] provide fallback options /etc/ssh/ssh_config
https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1285
Flavio Poletti <flavio at polettix.it> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |flavio at polettix.it
--- Comment #8 from Flavio Poletti <flavio at polettix.it> ---
Created attachment
2008 Sep 26
0
RFE: DynamicForward on ~C commandline and via ControlMaster
Hiyas,
currently the commandline that can be reached via ~C cannot create new
DynamicForwards. This is a feature I really miss, therefore it would be nice,
if it could be implemented, e.g.
-D 12345
should open a new socks proxy on port 12345 on the local machine.
Also I want to ask what the status on allowing additional a
{Local,Remote,Dynamic}Forward using in combination with ControlMaster
2002 Jan 07
1
rsync-2.5.1 / socket.c - unititialized variable breaks build.
In socket.c, the variable error is unitilialzed.
Also the variable length should be an unsigned int.
EAGLE> type socket.gdiff
--- ref_src:socket.c Sat Jan 5 13:27:07 2002
+++ lcl_src:socket.c Sun Jan 6 08:40:51 2002
@@ -1,3 +1,4 @@
+/* Converted by prj_src:unix_c_to_vms_c.tpu AND prj_src:socket.tpu on
6-JAN-20
02 08:40:51.01 OPENVMS_AXP */
/* -*- c-file-style: "linux"
2005 Nov 24
5
Call for release testing
Hi All,
We are planning on doing one of our regular releases (4.3/4.3p1) in
around a week. This is a bugfix release, but a few of the portability
bits have changed, so we would again appreciate testing on as many
systems as possible.
Some of the bugs fixed and internal improvements are:
* X forwarding won't start when a command is executed in background
(Bug #1086)
* Change
2023 Dec 20
0
print unreachable forwarding destinations?
When using LocalForward or DynamicForward sometimes the endpoint does no
longer exist but I need to find out *which* endpoint exactly. For example:
$ ssh -D 1234 server.example.net
On the client, maybe in another terminal:
$ curl --socks5-hostname localhost:1234 http://does-not-exist.local
curl: (97) connection to proxy closed
As expected. But on the server (OpenSSH 8.4), the following is
2020 Sep 29
4
[Bug 3214] New: Man page should specify which switches are incompatible with a 'command'
https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3214
Bug ID: 3214
Summary: Man page should specify which switches are
incompatible with a 'command'
Product: Portable OpenSSH
Version: 8.3p1
Hardware: Other
OS: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: enhancement
Priority: P5
2020 Nov 12
0
run firefox via an ssh tunnel
On Thu, Nov 12, 2020 at 10:02:57AM -0700, S Bob wrote:
> On 11/12/20 7:50 AM, Jonathan Billings wrote:
> > If this is actually something you want to do with regularity, I
> > suggest using the SSH SOCKS proxy (with the DynamicForward port), and
> > configure Firefox to use the localhost:port as a SOCKS5 proxy. Then
> > all traffic in firefox will be routed over the ssh