similar to: [Bug 1023] Add support for dhgex-sha512

The mac_compute() function in openssh calls umac_final() to prepend a tag to a buffer. Umac_final() calls pdf_gen_xor() on the tag as its final operation, and as implemented, pdf_gen_xor() assumes an appropriate alignment for 64-bit operations on its buffer. However, the buffer is declared in mac_compute() as a static u_char array, and the linker doesn't guarantee 64-bit alignment for such

Dear Guus, I've attached my first git commit to your repository. It does not contain any new functionalities, but it is a first try to interact with your git copy. Could you please verify, if you can push this commit to your repository? If it works, I'll send you the rest of my work, which contains: 1) some small improvements in logging (using flags instead of counters) 2) the

Hello All R Users, Function loglm() in library MASS can be cajoled to accomodate structural zeros in a cross-classification table. An example from Fienberg demonstrates how this can be done. My question is: Can the function glm() perform the same task? Can glm() estimate a log-linear model with fixed zeros like loglm()? Thanks for your help, Andrew ## Fienberg, The Analysis of Cross-Classified

On Fri, May 22, 2015 at 12:27:01, Darren Tucker <dtucker at zip.com.au> wrote: > Note that PuTTY does do Diffie-Hellman Group Exchange, but until very > recently (ie after their 0.64 release) they didn't do the one that was > actually standardized in RFC4419. OpenSSH recently removed support for > that non-standard one and as a result we don't offer DHGEX to PuTTY >

This has the advantage of being more efficient than the included routines and allows distros to centralize crypto mainteniance on a few libraries. --- configure.ac | 4 +- m4/ax_check_openssl.m4 | 124 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ src/libFLAC/Makefile.am | 2 +- src/libFLAC/include/private/md5.h | 8 ++- src/libFLAC/md5.c

> On Jun 6, 2017, at 4:08 PM, Michael Clark via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > > Hi Folks, > > I’m working on a port of musl libc to macos (arch triple is “x86_64-xnu-musl”) to solve some irreconcilable issues I’m having with libSystem.dylib. I don’t want to use glibc for various reasons, mainly because I want to static link. I have static PIE + ASLR working

> On Jun 14, 2017, at 2:47 PM, Michael Clark via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > >> >> On 15 Jun 2017, at 6:50 AM, Louis Gerbarg <lgerbarg at apple.com <mailto:lgerbarg at apple.com>> wrote: >> >>> >>> On Jun 6, 2017, at 4:08 PM, Michael Clark via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org <mailto:llvm-dev at

Hi, Here is a patch that adds the possibility of displaying key fingerprints in the bubblebabble format used by ssh.com ssh implementations. I hope it makes its way into the source. --- ./openssh-2.5.1/key_original.h Sun Mar 4 00:47:55 2001 +++ ./openssh-2.5.1/key.h Sun Mar 4 00:57:57 2001 @@ -36,6 +36,17 @@ KEY_DSA, KEY_UNSPEC }; + +enum digest_type { + DIGEST_TYPE_SHA1, +

https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2101 Bug ID: 2101 Summary: Unaligned memory access on sparc in UMAC implemetation Classification: Unclassified Product: Portable OpenSSH Version: 6.0p1 Hardware: Sparc OS: Solaris Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 Component: ssh

Anyone trying openssl 3 against openssh? -- Member - Liberal International This is doctor@@nl2k.ab.ca Ici doctor@@nl2k.ab.ca Yahweh, Queen & country!Never Satan President Republic!Beware AntiChrist rising! https://www.empire.kred/ROOTNK?t=94a1f39b Put more trust in nobility of character than in an oath. -Solon

RHEL6 and Fedora 14 use an improved password algorithm of SHA512 on a brand new install of the OS (:$6$ in shadow file). cat /etc/shadow user1:$6$<salt>$<password>:15006:0:99999:7::: I cannot get dovecot to authenticate. I've search for a way to change the default algorithm in dovecot and found you should use CRYPT but I don't know what to put in the

Hello, If I try to use the crypt schemes provided by libc. I fail as follows: jnikula at jlaptop:~/$ doveadm pw -s SHA512-CRYPT -p 123456 {SHA512-CRYPT}$6$to2umWLDtqvzS8SV$ZGpBeGNKuUN/2HKG6I2BEAt.Gzrz/y.SZDkos2GT2ik8obnp3XCFWfVsKVriJa6jjHULmLIqCSSyaF5YrTH7u. jnikula at jlaptop:~/$ doveadm pw -t

On 12/5/14, ML mail <mlnospam at yahoo.com> wrote: > Hello, > > I am wondering which variant is more secure for user authentication and > password scheme. Basically I am looking at both variants: > > 1) MD5-CRYPT password scheme storage with CRAM-MD5 auth mechanism > 2) SHA512-CRYPT password scheme storage with PLAIN auth mechanism > > In my opinion the option 2)

Am 06.12.2014 um 06:56 schrieb Jan Wide?: > If you add disable_plaintext_auth=yes ssl=required settings, then > dovecot will drop authentication without STARTTLS. But damage will be > done, client will send unencrypted (or in this scenario MD5 or SHA512 > hash) login/password no, damage will *not* be done STARTTLS happens in context of connect and *log before* any authentication is

Hi, I use Debian jessie with Dovecot 2.2.13-11. While writing a script for Horde to change the passwords in my passwd file I noticed doveadm pw -t fails for SHA512-CRYPT: # doveadm pw -s SHA1 -p test {SHA1}qUqP5cyxm6YcTAhz05Hph5gvu9M= # doveadm pw -t {SHA1}qUqP5cyxm6YcTAhz05Hph5gvu9M= -p test {SHA1}qUqP5cyxm6YcTAhz05Hph5gvu9M= (verified) # doveadm pw -s SHA512-CRYPT -p test

doveadm pw -t '{SHA512-CRYPT}$6$8FfoioQWQDR/Vuzu$ynKiO/E6Xf4dMvfx2LsP9KQotqy5cEOEppnEh5Hqe1UpCYAgOwSIJlNb0O65fxdYcRZH3gNFQ7ZOM/2kD/R811' -p test You have $ in the password, see man-page of shell ... Am 04.06.2015 um 05:29 schrieb Felix Zielcke: > oveadm pw -t {SHA512-CRYPT}$6$8FfoioQWQDR/Vuzu$ynKiO/E6Xf4dMvfx2LsP9KQotqy5cEOEppnEh5Hqe1UpCYAgOwSIJlNb0O65fxdYcRZH3gNFQ7ZOM/2kD/R811 -p

Hi, Thanks. That query doesn't return any parse errors but it does say that it can't save the password. Any ideas? Thanks. Dave. On 3/10/18, David Mehler <dave.mehler at gmail.com> wrote: > Hello, > > Thanks. Trying that query adapted to my database table and getting an > error can not save password, any ideas? > > When you made your initial database tables how

On 2018-03-10 (16:48 MST), David Mehler <dave.mehler at gmail.com> wrote: > > Thanks. That query doesn't return any parse errors but it does say > that it can't save the password. Are you referencing the right table in your database? -- It is the business of the future to be dangerous.

Hello, Yes I am referencing my virtual users table. Other suggestions welcome. Thanks. Dave. On 3/11/18, @lbutlr <kremels at kreme.com> wrote: > On 2018-03-10 (16:48 MST), David Mehler <dave.mehler at gmail.com> wrote: >> >> Thanks. That query doesn't return any parse errors but it does say >> that it can't save the password. > > Are you

On Mar 11, 2018, at 10:19, David Mehler <dave.mehler at gmail.com> wrote: > Other suggestions welcome. Does the account you are using have access to write the new passwords?> Doe s the command work from the command line or phpmyadmin? -- My main job is trying to come up with new and innovative and effective ways to reject even more mail. I'm up to about 97% now.