Displaying 20 results from an estimated 10000 matches similar to: "[Bug 985] scp doesn't honor local ~/.ssh/config for host2"
2006 Mar 12
0
[Bug 985] scp doesn't honor local ~/.ssh/config for host2
http://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=985
djm at mindrot.org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution| |WONTFIX
------- Comment #1 from djm at mindrot.org 2006-03-12 16:15 -------
2006 Oct 07
0
[Bug 985] scp doesn't honor local ~/.ssh/config for host2
http://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=985
dtucker at zip.com.au changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|RESOLVED |CLOSED
------- Comment #2 from dtucker at zip.com.au 2006-10-07 11:38 -------
Change all RESOLVED bug to CLOSED with the exception
2004 May 27
1
scp host1:file1 host2:file2 -> Permission denied??????
Hello,
I have a stupid problem with scp and I can't find where it comes from. I
am running 3 machines here with RedHat 7.3, RedHat 8 and RedHat 9. The 3
of them have openssh-3.7.1p2 (built from the SRPMS found on the openssh
web site).
I have though a problem to run a command of the type 'scp host1:file1
host2:file2' (my ssh being correctly setup):
[ted at papeete ~]$ scp
2002 Jan 16
0
scp host1 to host2
Hello all,
scp doesn't seem to do remote copy between 2 hosts ie. scp
host1:<file> host2:<file> doesn't ask for the passphrase when trying to
authenticate to host2. Now if I change my rsa key to have no passphrase
for host2 , I am able to do the remote scp.
Is this a known issue ?
So scp doesnot work if you cannot authenticate without user interaction
to host2?
I am using
2001 Feb 24
1
scp user@host1 user@host2 broken?
Hello all,
Is it just me or is 'scp user at host1 user at host2' broken (if the server asks
you for the password)?
1) [password required]
>From OpenSSH 2.5.1p1 -> OpenSSH 2.5.1p1 -> OpenSSH 2.3.0, I get like:
> scp pekkas at xxx:~/*.patch psavola at yyy:~/temp/
psavola at xxx's password:
You have no controlling tty. Cannot read passphrase.
lost connection
2)
2003 Oct 24
1
rsync -vae ssh user@host1:/tmp/dir user@host2:/tmp/
I have legitimate ssh access to two remote machines. ssh directly
from either machine to the other is blocked by firewalls which I cannot
control.
$ rsync -vae ssh user@host1:/tmp/dir user@host2:/tmp/
receiving file list ... done
rsync: mkdir user@host2:/tmp: No such file or directory
rsync error: error in file IO (code 11) at main.c(319)
I would like this to copy host1:/tmp/dir into
2010 Nov 09
15
[Bug 1837] New: scp fails key auth/connection on second host when two remote paths are specified
https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1837
Summary: scp fails key auth/connection on second host when two
remote paths are specified
Product: Portable OpenSSH
Version: 5.3p1
Platform: All
OS/Version: All
Status: NEW
Severity: minor
Priority: P4
Component: scp
AssignedTo:
2014 Mar 12
1
[Bug 2210] New: scp -q isn't quiet when copying between two remote hosts
https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2210
Bug ID: 2210
Summary: scp -q isn't quiet when copying between two remote
hosts
Product: Portable OpenSSH
Version: 6.0p1
Hardware: PPC
OS: AIX
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P5
Component: scp
2002 Jun 10
0
Filesystem Permission problems
HI,
I would like to copy my file, i.e. test_file.cc on 1 host machine into
another user's home directory i.e /usr/adm/ken_lee/
, on a different host machine. These 2 hosts machines, i.e host1 and host2
are on different NIS domains.
I tried copying my file into the other user's home directory, by invoking
the rsync command on my host machine i.e host1:
# rsync -avzo
2003 Jan 06
3
ownership permissions on files replaced via scp -- bug or feature?
I've noticed the following behavior on files that are overwritten with
an scp command and I can't decide if this is intended behavior or a bug?
Can someone with a little more insight please share the reasoning for
this (if any)? I've tested this with a mix of 3.4p1 and 3.5p1 hosts.
Suppose we have 2 files on different hosts, with different group
ownership and permissions. user1 is not
2006 Feb 26
2
[Bug 1164] scp with spaces username no longer works
http://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1164
Summary: scp with spaces username no longer works
Product: Portable OpenSSH
Version: 4.3p2
Platform: Other
OS/Version: All
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Component: scp
AssignedTo: bitbucket at mindrot.org
ReportedBy: dtucker at
2006 May 14
1
scp patch to delete source files after copy
At work we have a large collection of scripts to move log
and config files around. These depend on commercial (F-Secure)
ssh/scp, as it supports the -u option to delete the source file
after (successful) copying. That is the sole reason we can't
run openssh on our 150+ unix boxes.
I have attached a patch below, which adds the -u option to
delete the source file after copying, provided there
2015 Feb 27
2
remote-remote scp
Hi everyone,
I know scp is kind of the red-headed stepchild of the suite, but I'd like to propose an extension to the syntax for remote-remote passthrough using the "-3" option.
Currently the syntax is essentially
scp -3 [ -P port ] [user@]host1:file [user@]host2:file
This is great, as long as both remotes are on the same port. It causes difficulties if host1 and host2 are not
2015 May 22
5
[Bug 2404] New: scp skips file/directory on permissions error
https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2404
Bug ID: 2404
Summary: scp skips file/directory on permissions error
Product: Portable OpenSSH
Version: 6.7p1
Hardware: All
OS: All
Status: NEW
Severity: major
Priority: P5
Component: scp
Assignee: unassigned-bugs at mindrot.org
2000 Sep 18
0
scp.1
A few people have commented that the synopsis in 'man 1 scp' is a
bit difficult for humans to parse. I attach a diff between the
distributed version and mine:
(I suppose this should really go to the OpenBSD maintainers, but I
wanted a little feedback about whether this was better or not.)
Thanks,
Andrew Stribblehill
Systems Programmer, IT Service, University of Durham
--------------
2003 Feb 03
1
No -b (bind) with SCP?
In man ssh:
-b bind_address
Specify the interface to transmit from on machines with
multiple
interfaces or aliased addresses.
For ssh, but also looked in SCP manpage, didn't find anything, anyone
know if this option will be supported in future versions of OpenSSH?
$ scp -b
scp: illegal option -- b
usage: scp [-pqrvBC46] [-F config] [-S program] [-P port]
2011 Dec 09
1
Samba 3.0, fuse-hdfs and write problems
Hi folks,
I research at the moment a connection over fuse and samba for
hadoop-cluster. Its my private playground, but I have some issues I can't
figure out why they happen.
I use RHEL5.7, packetlist:
rpm -qa|grep samba
samba-3.0.33-3.29.el5_7.4.x86_64
samba-common-3.0.33-3.29.el5_7.4.x86_64
2 servers, one provides samba-shares and one I use as client.
Samba-Server (HOST2):
FuseFS:
2002 Feb 02
2
disabling the authentication agent?
Is there any way to disable the authentication agent globally? I'm not
quite sure I understand it's purpose. Here is some background info:
workstation: Key pair (dsa).
host1: No key pair. No authorized_keys.
host2: Has my workstation's key in authorized_keys.
I ssh to host1 from my workstation.
I ssh to host2 from host1. I am asked for a password. Good.
I ssh to host2 from my
2015 Mar 20
1
help with tinc unstable state
I am using tinc to connect together VPCs in AWS across multiple regions and
accounts to provide secure communication. For the most part, it works
great. A few times, I have seen issues where something got into an
unstable state that didn't seem to resolve itself. Shutting down tinc on
all hosts and restarting seemed to do the trick, but I'd like to see if
there is something that I can
2004 Aug 31
1
[PATCH] supporting a remote scp path option in scp
Hi there,
I've written some enhancements to scp.c and pathnames.h to enable the scp
to arbitrarily set the remote scp path.
(eg $ scp -e /usr/bin/scp foo user at bar:foo)
I did read the "scp: command not found" FAQ entry but I'm not quite sure
why we can't do this, unless it's because enhancements to scp are no
longer a priority. Any other reason why it "is the