similar to: [Bug 973] sshd behaves differently while doing syslog entries for tcpwrappers denied message, with -r and without -r option.

I''ve just found myself stuck trying to rspec something so am hoping someone more knowledgable can help. I have a Connector class which has a class method ''results'' that yields results it get from a network service based on a set of attributes that I pass to it. I am wanting to yield these results from my Intermediate class up to the next

Dear R users, Suppose I have 2 R script files: 'test1.R' and 'test2.R' and one R file 'main.R' which sources each of them. I wonder if there is a way to skip rest of code in 'test1.R' once a condition is met but still continue to run rest of script from the 'main'R' file. A simple example is shown below. I hope only 'message1' and

I've seen alot of posts lately on Queue and Agent functionality, and alot of hacks to make them do different things that most call center managers want. In the sake of doing this one time, I'd like to develop a single list of request so we can consolidate a feature request for the Queue/Agent system. Here are the ones that I run into the most: 1. Queue should know the status of agents

Hi! I'm using lazy_expunge to backup that are deleted/expunged, but I would like it to be visible to the user. I tried something like: namespace private { prefix = .EXPUNGED/ separator = / location = maildir:~/Maildir/.Apagadas } namespace private { prefix = .DELETED/ separator = / location = maildir:~/Maildir/.Apagadas } namespace private { prefix = .DELETED/.EXPUNGED/

First off, the website documentation is really good for Dovecot but while reading I was not able to find anything pertaining to inbox hashing for Maildirs. I saw plenty about hashing the directories that the user mailboxes live in but nothing about specifically hashing an individual user's inbox directory itself. Is there any method for hashing the inbox automatically after say 5,000

https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2681 Bug ID: 2681 Summary: postauth processes to log via monitor Product: Portable OpenSSH Version: 7.4p1 Hardware: Other OS: Linux Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P5 Component: sshd Assignee: unassigned-bugs at

http://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=948 ------- Additional Comments From dtucker at zip.com.au 2005-01-19 20:01 ------- Also worth trying: patch #772 in bug #973 ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.

http://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=948 dtucker at zip.com.au changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- URL| |http://www.aet.tu- | |cottbus.de/rt2/Ticket/Displa |

Apparently the first time I posted this, it was tacked onto the end of another thread. Please pardon my repost. Won''t happen again. -------- Howdy. I''m just getting into Rails, and really enjoying it! I''m coming from the .NET world, so I''ll embarrassedly admit that I''m running it on winXP and even using SQLServer (for now, may switch to mysql

fyi (i'm behind in following the passord expire efforts). ----- Forwarded message from Logu <logsnaath at gmx.net> ----- Date: Sat, 7 Dec 2002 02:42:52 +0530 From: "Logu" <logsnaath at gmx.net> To: <stevesk at cvs.openbsd.org> Cc: <kumaresh_ind at gmx.net> Subject: Password expiry related clarification in OpenSSH3.5p1 Hello Stevesk, We are using

Hi, This is an early warning: OpenSSH will drop tcpwrappers in the next release. sshd_config has supported the Match keyword for a long time and it is possible to express more useful conditions (e.g. matching by user and address) than tcpwrappers allowed. Removing it reduces the amount of code in the 'hot' pre-authentication path in sshd and rids us of a dependency. -d

On Tue, Apr 22, 2014 at 9:33 AM, Damien Miller <djm at mindrot.org> wrote: > Hi, > > This is an early warning: OpenSSH will drop tcpwrappers in the next > release. sshd_config has supported the Match keyword for a long time > and it is possible to express more useful conditions (e.g. matching > by user and address) than tcpwrappers allowed. > > Removing it reduces the

I have set up entries in /etc/hosts.allow and /etc/hosts.deny as follows: /etc/hosts.allow sendmail : 10.0.0.0/255.0.0.0 sendmail : LOCAL /etc/hosts.deny sendmail : ALL When I try to connect to port 25 from an Internet host via telnet, the server still responds as usual. The only difference I see is this in my /var/log/maillog: Apr 24 15:41:49 server sendmail[20691]: m3OKfna20691: tcpwrappers

Good Morning, I have a Centos 4.5 (x86_64) server running samba to share data with windows users. We've been going through a security audit and the following log entries were noted: [2007/09/24 09:37:29, 0] rpc_server/srv_util.c:get_alias_user_groups(206) get_alias_user_groups: gid of user bendew doesn't exist. Check your /etc/passwd and /etc/group files [2007/09/24 09:37:29, 1]

On 23 April 2014 21:43, mancha <mancha1 at zoho.com> wrote: > On Wed, Apr 23, 2014 at 12:26:58PM -0700, Iain Morgan wrote: >> A slightly better solution would be a PAM module that uses the same >> syntax as libwrap. Possibly someone has already written such a module. > > Possibly, but only for platforms which use for PAM. Pam is executed so late in the chain that any

hi everybody having I believe sort of plain-vanilla config with section in 10-tcpwrapper.conf as per docs login_access_sockets = tcpwrap service tcpwrap { unix_listener login/tcpwrap { group = $default_login_user mode = 0600 user = $default_login_user } } /etc/hosts.deny contains: ALL: given_host and yet dovecot logins IMAP client in whereas other tcpwrapper aware

Hi, I used dovecot 1.x for quite a while and it worked fine. However, I used it through inetd and used hosts.allow/deny to restrict access to only certain groups of systems. Since yesterday I have dovecot 2.0.13. But in version 2.0.13 it seems that starting using inetd doesn't work anymore : I only get a strange error message if I try to connect using telnet : telnet localhost imap

I can't seem to get netmask notations to work in /etc/hosts.allow on my Centos 4.4 systems. The docs seem to indicate that network specifications like 192.168.100.0/24 or 192.168.100.0/255.255.255.0 should work. However, I can only get networks specified like 192.168.100. to work. Anyone know what I'm missing? Thanks, Tom

Hello there ! Has anyone managed to make work on tcp wrappers on hosts.allow the swpan command in order to check the ip if it is on the permitted one ..? __________ Information from ESET Endpoint Antivirus, version of detection engine 16143 (20170926) __________ The message was checked by ESET Endpoint Antivirus. Email message - is OK http://www.eset.com

Hello, we want to use dovecot LMTP for efficient mail delivery from our MX servers (running postfix 2.8) to our storage servers (dovecot 2.0.17). However, the one problem we see is the lack of access control when using LMTP. It apears that every client in our network who has access to the storage machines can drop a message in a Maildir of any user on that storage server. To prevent this